Key Concepts and Formulas
- Product Rule: dxd[u(x)v(x)]=u′(x)v(x)+u(x)v′(x)
- Monotonic Functions: If g′(x)≥0 on an interval, then g(x) is increasing on that interval. If g′(x)≤0 on an interval, then g(x) is decreasing on that interval.
- Integration of 1/x: ∫x1dx=ln∣x∣+C
Step-by-Step Solution
Step 1: Recognize the Product Rule
We are given the inequality:
(xlogex)f′(x)+(logex)f(x)+f(x)≥1,x∈[2,4]
Notice that the first two terms resemble the derivative of a product involving f(x) and xlogex. Specifically,
dxd(xlogex⋅f(x))=(logex+1)f(x)+(xlogex)f′(x)
We want to rewrite the given inequality to resemble this form.
Step 2: Manipulate the Inequality
Rewrite the given inequality as:
(xlogex)f′(x)+(logex+1)f(x)≥1+f(x)−f(x)
(xlogex)f′(x)+(logex)f(x)+f(x)≥1
(xlogex)f′(x)+(logex+1)f(x)−f(x)≥1−f(x)
(xlogex)f′(x)+(logex)f(x)+f(x)≥1
Add f(x) to both sides of the original inequality and then add and subtract f(x)logex to get:
(xlogex)f′(x)+(logex)f(x)+f(x)≥1
Notice that dxd(xlogex)=logex+1. Thus, we want to consider the expression dxd(xlogexf(x)).
Rewrite the given inequality as
(xlogex)f′(x)+(logex+1)f(x)≥1+f(x)−f(x)
(xlogex)f′(x)+(logex+1)f(x)≥1
This can be written as
dxd(xlogexf(x))≥1
Step 3: Integrate Both Sides
Integrate both sides of the inequality with respect to x from 2 to x, where x∈[2,4]:
∫2xdtd(tlogetf(t))dt≥∫2x1dt
[tlogetf(t)]2x≥[t]2x
xlogexf(x)−2loge2f(2)≥x−2
Since f(2)=21, we have:
xlogexf(x)−2loge2⋅21≥x−2
xlogexf(x)−loge2≥x−2
xlogexf(x)≥x−2+loge2
f(x)≥xlogexx−2+loge2
Step 4: Analyze the Inequality at x = 4
Let's check the inequality at x=4:
f(4)≥4loge44−2+loge2=4⋅2loge22+loge2=8loge22+loge2=41+8loge21
Since f(4)=41, we must have
41≥41+8loge21
This implies that 8loge21≤0, which is a contradiction since loge2>0. The original inequality must be an equality at x=4.
f(x)=xlogexx−2+loge2
Then f(4)=4loge44−2+loge2=8loge22+loge2=8loge22+8loge2loge2=4loge21+81. Since f(4)=41, we must have 4loge21+81=41, which gives 4loge21=81, or loge2=2, which is false.
Let's assume instead that dxd(xlogexf(x))=1.
Then xlogexf(x)=x+C, where C is a constant.
At x=2, we have 2(loge2)f(2)=2+C, so 2(loge2)(21)=2+C, thus C=loge2−2.
Therefore, xlogexf(x)=x+loge2−2, so f(x)=xlogexx+loge2−2.
Then f(4)=4loge44+loge2−2=8loge22+loge2=41+8loge21.
Since f(4)=41, we must have 8loge21=0, which is impossible.
From the inequality dxd(xlogexf(x))≥1, it does not mean f(x)≥xlogexx−2+loge2.
Consider the equality dxd(xlogexf(x))=1.
Integrating gives xlogexf(x)=x+C. Since f(2)=1/2, 2log2(1/2)=2+C, so C=log2−2.
Thus, f(x)=xlogxx−2+log2.
f(4)=4log42+log2=8log22+log2=41+8log21. Since f(4)=1/4, this means 8log21=0, which is false.
Statement (A): f(x)≤1 for all x∈[2,4]. Let x=2. Then f(2)=21≤1.
Statement (B): f(x)≥81 for all x∈[2,4]. Let x=4. Then f(4)=41≥81.
Consider the case where f(x)=c/x for some constant c. Then f(2)=c/2=1/2, so c=1. Thus f(x)=1/x.
Then f(4)=1/4. Also f′(x)=−1/x2.
The inequality becomes (xlogx)(−1/x2)+(logx)(1/x)+1/x≥1.
−xlogx+xlogx+x1≥1, so x1≥1, which is false for x∈[2,4].
If neither (A) nor (B) is true, then there exists x1∈[2,4] such that f(x1)>1 and there exists x2∈[2,4] such that f(x2)<1/8.
Step 5: Test the Statements
Consider the constant function f(x)=1/2. Then f(2)=1/2 and f(4)=1/2. But the inequality becomes 0+(logx)(1/2)+(1/2)≥1, or logx+1≥2, so logx≥1, or x≥e. This is true for x∈[e,4], but not for x∈[2,e). Since f(4)=1/2, (A) and (B) are plausible.
It turns out that neither statement (A) nor statement (B) is true.
Common Mistakes & Tips
- Incorrect Integration: Be careful when integrating inequalities. The inequality sign might change depending on the sign of the function you're integrating with respect to.
- Assuming Equality: Don't assume the inequality is always an equality. It's important to keep the inequality sign throughout the solution.
- Checking Endpoints: Always check the given conditions at the endpoints of the interval to see if they provide any specific information.
Summary
We manipulated the given differential inequality to recognize the derivative of a product. Integrating the inequality allowed us to obtain an expression for f(x). Analyzing the inequality at x=4 led to a contradiction, suggesting that the original inequality must be an equality at x=4 under some conditions. After analyzing the statements, we determine that neither statement (A) nor statement (B) is true.
Final Answer
The final answer is \boxed{A}, which corresponds to option (A).