Skip to main content
Back to Binomial Theorem
JEE Main 2020
Binomial Theorem
Binomial Theorem
Hard

Question

If k=131(31Ck)(31Ck1)k=130(30Ck)(30Ck1)=α(60!)(30!)(31!)\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{31} {\left( {{}^{31}{C_k}} \right)\left( {{}^{31}{C_{k - 1}}} \right) - \sum\limits_{k = 1}^{30} {\left( {{}^{30}{C_k}} \right)\left( {{}^{30}{C_{k - 1}}} \right) = {{\alpha (60!)} \over {(30!)(31!)}}} } , where α\alpha \in R, then the value of 16α\alpha is equal to

Options

Solution

Key Concept: Vandermonde's Identity

This problem primarily relies on Vandermonde's Identity, which is a fundamental identity in combinatorics used to evaluate sums of products of binomial coefficients. The identity states:

k=0rnCkmCrk=n+mCr\sum_{k=0}^{r} {^n C_k \cdot ^m C_{r-k}} = {^{n+m} C_r}

This identity essentially tells us that if we choose rr items from a set of n+mn+m items, it's equivalent to choosing kk items from the first nn items and rkr-k items from the remaining mm items, and summing over all possible values of kk.

Another useful property of binomial coefficients is symmetry: nCr=nCnr{^n C_r = ^n C_{n-r}}.

Problem Setup

We are given the equation: k=131(31Ck)(31Ck1)k=130(30Ck)(30Ck1)=α(60!)(30!)(31!)\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{31} {\left( {{}^{31}{C_k}} \right)\left( {{}^{31}{C_{k - 1}}} \right) - \sum\limits_{k = 1}^{30} {\left( {{}^{30}{C_k}} \right)\left( {{}^{30}{C_{k - 1}}} \right) = {{\alpha (60!)} \over {(30!)(31!)}}} } Our goal is to find the value of 16α16\alpha. We will evaluate each summation term separately.


Step 1: Evaluating the First Summation

Let's evaluate the first sum: S1=k=131(31Ck)(31Ck1)S_1 = \sum\limits_{k = 1}^{31} {\left( {{}^{31}{C_k}} \right)\left( {{}^{31}{C_{k - 1}}} \right)}.

  • Expand the sum: S1=31C131C0+31C231C1+31C331C2++31C3131C30S_1 = {}^{31}{C_1} \cdot {}^{31}{C_0} + {}^{31}{C_2} \cdot {}^{31}{C_1} + {}^{31}{C_3} \cdot {}^{31}{C_2} + \dots + {}^{31}{C_{31}} \cdot {}^{31}{C_{30}}

  • Apply the symmetry property (nCr=nCnr{^n C_r = ^n C_{n-r}}) to the second term in each product: We want to transform this sum into the form required by Vandermonde's Identity. To do this, we rewrite 31Ck1{}^{31}{C_{k-1}} as 31C31(k1)=31C32k{}^{31}{C_{31-(k-1)}} = {}^{31}{C_{32-k}}. However, a simpler approach for this specific sum is to rewrite the first term as 31Ck=31C31k{}^{31}{C_k} = {}^{31}{C_{31-k}}. This is often more straightforward when one index is fixed relative to the other. Let's change the second term: 31Ck1=31C31(k1)=31C32k{}^{31}{C_{k-1}} = {}^{31}{C_{31-(k-1)}} = {}^{31}{C_{32-k}}. So the sum becomes: S1=k=13131Ck31C32kS_1 = \sum\limits_{k = 1}^{31} {{}^{31}{C_k} \cdot {}^{31}{C_{32-k}}} This is not quite in the form of Vandermonde's Identity. Let's try rewriting the Ck1C_{k-1} term from the original sum: Consider the term 31Ck1{}^{31}{C_{k-1}}. We can write this as 31C31(k1)=31C32k{}^{31}{C_{31-(k-1)}} = {}^{31}{C_{32-k}}. So the sum is k=13131Ck31C32k\sum_{k=1}^{31} {^{31}C_k \cdot ^{31}C_{32-k}}. Let j=k1j = k-1. Then k=j+1k = j+1. When k=1,j=0k=1, j=0. When k=31,j=30k=31, j=30. The sum becomes: S1=j=03031Cj+131CjS_1 = \sum_{j=0}^{30} {^{31}C_{j+1} \cdot ^{31}C_j} Now, apply symmetry to the second term: 31Cj=31C31j{}^{31}{C_j} = {}^{31}{C_{31-j}}. S1=j=03031Cj+131C31jS_1 = \sum_{j=0}^{30} {^{31}C_{j+1} \cdot {}^{31}{C_{31-j}}} This still doesn't look like the standard Vandermonde form directly.

    Let's follow the common technique from the given solution, which is simpler for this specific structure: Rewrite 31Ck1{}^{31}{C_{k-1}} as 31C31(k1)=31C32k{}^{31}{C_{31-(k-1)}} = {}^{31}{C_{32-k}}. Then: S1=31C131C31+31C231C30++31C3131C1S_1 = {}^{31}{C_1} \cdot {}^{31}{C_{31}} + {}^{31}{C_2} \cdot {}^{31}{C_{30}} + \dots + {}^{31}{C_{31}} \cdot {}^{31}{C_{1}} This is still not quite right.

    The key is to rewrite one of the terms such that the sum of the lower indices is constant. The existing solution used: 31Ck31Ck1{}^{31}{C_k} \cdot {}^{31}{C_{k-1}} and transformed it into a sum like: 31C031C30+31C131C29++31C3031C0{}^{31}{C_0} \cdot {}^{31}{C_{30}} + {}^{31}{C_1} \cdot {}^{31}{C_{29}} + \dots + {}^{31}{C_{30}} \cdot {}^{31}{C_0} Let's derive this. We have 31Ck{}^{31}{C_k} and 31Ck1{}^{31}{C_{k-1}}. Apply nCr=nCnr{}^n{C_r} = {}^n{C_{n-r}} to the second term: 31Ck1=31C31(k1)=31C32k{}^{31}{C_{k-1}} = {}^{31}{C_{31-(k-1)}} = {}^{31}{C_{32-k}}. So the general term is 31Ck31C32k{}^{31}{C_k} \cdot {}^{31}{C_{32-k}}. The sum is k=13131Ck31C32k\sum_{k=1}^{31} {^{31}C_k \cdot ^{31}C_{32-k}}. Let r=kr = k. Then the second index is 32r32-r. The sum of the lower indices is r+(32r)=32r + (32-r) = 32. This implies that the sum is equal to 31+31C32=62C32{}^{31+31}{C_{32}} = {}^{62}{C_{32}}. Using the property nCr=nCnr{^n C_r = ^n C_{n-r}}, we have 62C32=62C6232=62C30{}^{62}{C_{32}} = {}^{62}{C_{62-32}} = {}^{62}{C_{30}}.

  • Applying Vandermonde's Identity (detailed): We have the sum S1=k=131(31Ck)(31Ck1)S_1 = \sum\limits_{k = 1}^{31} {\left( {{}^{31}{C_k}} \right)\left( {{}^{31}{C_{k - 1}}} \right)}. To apply Vandermonde's Identity, we need one term with index kk and another with index rkr-k. Let's rewrite 31Ck1{}^{31}{C_{k-1}} using symmetry: 31Ck1=31C31(k1)=31C32k{}^{31}{C_{k-1}} = {}^{31}{C_{31-(k-1)}} = {}^{31}{C_{32-k}}. So, S1=k=13131Ck31C32kS_1 = \sum\limits_{k = 1}^{31} {{}^{31}{C_k} \cdot {}^{31}{C_{32-k}}}. Let n=31n=31, m=31m=31, and r=32r=32. The sum is of the form knCkmCrk\sum_{k} {^n C_k \cdot ^m C_{r-k}}. The minimum value of kk is 11. The maximum value of kk is 3131. The minimum value of 32k32-k is 3231=132-31=1. The maximum value of 32k32-k is 321=3132-1=31. Since the binomial coefficients NCX{^N C_X} are zero if X<0X < 0 or X>NX > N, we can extend the summation range to k=0k=0 to k=32k=32 without changing the sum value. For k=0k=0, 31C031C32{}^{31}{C_0} \cdot {}^{31}{C_{32}} (since 31C32=0{}^{31}{C_{32}} = 0, this term is 0). For k=32k=32, 31C3231C0{}^{31}{C_{32}} \cdot {}^{31}{C_0} (since 31C32=0{}^{31}{C_{32}} = 0, this term is 0). Therefore, S1=k=03231Ck31C32kS_1 = \sum_{k=0}^{32} {^{31}C_k \cdot ^{31}C_{32-k}} Now, this exactly matches Vandermonde's Identity with n=31n=31, m=31m=31, and r=32r=32. S1=31+31C32=62C32S_1 = {}^{31+31}{C_{32}} = {}^{62}{C_{32}} Using the symmetry property NCX=NCNX{^N C_X = ^N C_{N-X}}: S1=62C6232=62C30S_1 = {}^{62}{C_{62-32}} = {}^{62}{C_{30}}


Step 2: Evaluating the Second Summation

Next, let's evaluate the second sum: S2=k=130(30Ck)(30Ck1)S_2 = \sum\limits_{k = 1}^{30} {\left( {{}^{30}{C_k}} \right)\left( {{}^{30}{C_{k - 1}}} \right)}.

  • Expand the sum: S2=30C130C0+30C230C1++30C3030C29S_2 = {}^{30}{C_1} \cdot {}^{30}{C_0} + {}^{30}{C_2} \cdot {}^{30}{C_1} + \dots + {}^{30}{C_{30}} \cdot {}^{30}{C_{29}}

  • Apply the symmetry property (nCr=nCnr{^n C_r = ^n C_{n-r}}) to the second term in each product: Rewrite 30Ck1{}^{30}{C_{k-1}} as 30C30(k1)=30C31k{}^{30}{C_{30-(k-1)}} = {}^{30}{C_{31-k}}. So, S2=k=13030Ck30C31kS_2 = \sum\limits_{k = 1}^{30} {{}^{30}{C_k} \cdot {}^{30}{C_{31-k}}}.

  • Applying Vandermonde's Identity (detailed): Let n=30n=30, m=30m=30, and r=31r=31. The sum is of the form knCkmCrk\sum_{k} {^n C_k \cdot ^m C_{r-k}}. The minimum value of kk is 11. The maximum value of kk is 3030. The minimum value of 31k31-k is 3130=131-30=1. The maximum value of 31k31-k is 311=3031-1=30. Similar to S1S_1, we can extend the summation range to k=0k=0 to k=31k=31. For k=0k=0, 30C030C31{}^{30}{C_0} \cdot {}^{30}{C_{31}} (which is 0). For k=31k=31, 30C3130C0{}^{30}{C_{31}} \cdot {}^{30}{C_0} (which is 0). Therefore, S2=k=03130Ck30C31kS_2 = \sum_{k=0}^{31} {^{30}C_k \cdot ^{30}C_{31-k}} Now, this exactly matches Vandermonde's Identity with n=30n=30, m=30m=30, and r=31r=31. S2=30+30C31=60C31S_2 = {}^{30+30}{C_{31}} = {}^{60}{C_{31}} Using the symmetry property NCX=NCNX{^N C_X = ^N C_{N-X}}: S2=60C6031=60C29S_2 = {}^{60}{C_{60-31}} = {}^{60}{C_{29}}


Step 3: Substituting back into the Original Equation

Now we substitute the values of S1S_1 and S2S_2 back into the given equation: 62C3060C29=α(60!)(30!)(31!){}^{62}{C_{30}} - {}^{60}{C_{29}} = {{\alpha (60!)} \over {(30!)(31!)}}


Step 4: Simplifying the Expression and Solving for α\alpha

We need to express the binomial coefficients in terms of factorials and simplify to find α\alpha. The right-hand side has a specific factorial form, so we aim to transform the left-hand side into that form as well.

  • Express 62C30{}^{62}{C_{30}} in terms of factorials: 62C30=62!30!(6230)!=62!30!32!{}^{62}{C_{30}} = \frac{62!}{30!(62-30)!} = \frac{62!}{30!32!} To match the denominator (30!)(31!)(30!)(31!) on the right side, we can expand 62!62! and 32!32!: 62C30=62×61×60!30!×32×31!=(62×6132)60!30!31!{}^{62}{C_{30}} = \frac{62 \times 61 \times 60!}{30! \times 32 \times 31!} = \left( \frac{62 \times 61}{32} \right) \frac{60!}{30!31!} This is a crucial step to make the terms comparable.

  • Express 60C29{}^{60}{C_{29}} in terms of factorials: 60C29=60!29!(6029)!=60!29!31!{}^{60}{C_{29}} = \frac{60!}{29!(60-29)!} = \frac{60!}{29!31!} To match the denominator (30!)(31!)(30!)(31!) on the right side, we can multiply the numerator and denominator by 3030: 60C29=60!29!31!=30×60!30×29!31!=30×60!30!31!{}^{60}{C_{29}} = \frac{60!}{29!31!} = \frac{30 \times 60!}{30 \times 29!31!} = \frac{30 \times 60!}{30!31!}

  • Substitute these back into the equation: (62×6132)60!30!31!(30)60!30!31!=α(60!)(30!)(31!)\left( \frac{62 \times 61}{32} \right) \frac{60!}{30!31!} - \left( 30 \right) \frac{60!}{30!31!} = {{\alpha (60!)} \over {(30!)(31!)}}

  • Factor out the common term 60!30!31!\frac{60!}{30!31!}: 60!30!31!(62×613230)=α(60!)(30!)(31!)\frac{60!}{30!31!} \left( \frac{62 \times 61}{32} - 30 \right) = {{\alpha (60!)} \over {(30!)(31!)}}

  • Cancel the common factorial term from both sides: 62×613230=α\frac{62 \times 61}{32} - 30 = \alpha

  • Calculate the value of α\alpha: α=37823230\alpha = \frac{3782}{32} - 30 α=18911630\alpha = \frac{1891}{16} - 30 To combine, find a common denominator: α=18911630×1616=189148016\alpha = \frac{1891}{16} - \frac{30 \times 16}{16} = \frac{1891 - 480}{16} α=141116\alpha = \frac{1411}{16}


Step 5: Calculating 16α16\alpha

The problem asks for the value of 16α16\alpha. 16α=16×14111616\alpha = 16 \times \frac{1411}{16} 16α=141116\alpha = 1411


Tips and Common Mistakes to Avoid

  1. Careful Application of Vandermonde's Identity: Ensure the indices match the form k=0rnCkmCrk\sum_{k=0}^{r} {^n C_k \cdot ^m C_{r-k}}. If they don't, use the symmetry property (nCr=nCnr{^n C_r = ^n C_{n-r}}) to transform one of the terms. Also, be mindful of the summation limits; extending them to 0 or up to nn (or mm) is often valid if the additional terms are zero.
  2. Factorial Manipulation: When simplifying expressions involving factorials, aim to get a common factorial term that can be cancelled. This often involves expanding larger factorials (e.g., N!=N×(N1)!N! = N \times (N-1)!) or multiplying by terms like XX\frac{X}{X} to adjust denominators.
  3. Arithmetic Errors: Double-check calculations, especially when dealing with large numbers, multiplications, and subtractions.

Summary

The problem was efficiently solved by recognizing and applying Vandermonde's Identity to simplify the two given summations. Each sum, after a simple transformation using the symmetry property of binomial coefficients, reduced to a single binomial coefficient. Subsequently, careful algebraic manipulation of the factorial forms allowed us to solve for α\alpha and ultimately find the value of 16α16\alpha. The core takeaway is the power of Vandermonde's Identity in combinatorial sums.

The final answer is 1411\boxed{\text{1411}}.

Practice More Binomial Theorem Questions

View All Questions