Consider the following two statements : Statement I: For any two non-zero complex numbers z1,z2,(∣z1∣+∣z2∣)∣z1∣z1+∣z2∣z2≤2(∣z1∣+∣z2∣), and Statement II : If x,y,z are three distinct complex numbers and a,b,c are three positive real numbers such that ∣y−z∣a=∣z−x∣b=∣x−y∣c, then y−za2+z−xb2+x−yc2=1. Between the above two statements,
Options
Solution
Key Concepts and Formulas
Triangle Inequality: For complex numbers z1 and z2, ∣z1+z2∣≤∣z1∣+∣z2∣.
Modulus and Conjugate: For a complex number z, ∣z∣2=zzˉ, where zˉ is the complex conjugate of z. Also, z1−z2=z1ˉ−z2ˉ.
Polar Form: A complex number z can be written as z=∣z∣eiθ, where ∣z∣ is the modulus and θ is the argument.
Step-by-Step Solution
1. Analysis of Statement I
Step 1: Simplify the given inequality.
The given inequality is (∣z1∣+∣z2∣)∣z1∣z1+∣z2∣z2≤2(∣z1∣+∣z2∣).
Since ∣z1∣+∣z2∣ is a positive real number, we can divide both sides by it without changing the inequality's direction:
∣z1∣z1+∣z2∣z2≤2Explanation: This simplification isolates the core of the inequality for easier analysis.
Step 2: Recognize unit complex numbers.
Let u1=∣z1∣z1 and u2=∣z2∣z2. Then ∣u1∣=∣u2∣=1, so u1 and u2 are unit complex numbers.
Explanation: Identifying these as unit complex numbers is key because we know their moduli are equal to 1.
Step 3: Apply the Triangle Inequality.
We need to check if ∣u1+u2∣≤2 is always true.
By the triangle inequality, ∣u1+u2∣≤∣u1∣+∣u2∣=1+1=2.
Thus, ∣u1+u2∣≤2 is always true.
Explanation: The triangle inequality directly shows that the modulus of the sum of two unit complex numbers is always less than or equal to 2.
Step 4: Alternative Approach using Polar Form.
Let z1=∣z1∣eiθ1 and z2=∣z2∣eiθ2.
Then ∣z1∣z1=eiθ1 and ∣z2∣z2=eiθ2.
We want to evaluate ∣eiθ1+eiθ2∣.
∣eiθ1+eiθ2∣2=(eiθ1+eiθ2)(eiθ1+eiθ2)=(eiθ1+eiθ2)(e−iθ1+e−iθ2)=eiθ1e−iθ1+eiθ1e−iθ2+eiθ2e−iθ1+eiθ2e−iθ2=1+ei(θ1−θ2)+ei(θ2−θ1)+1=2+ei(θ1−θ2)+e−i(θ1−θ2)=2+2cos(θ1−θ2)=2(1+cos(θ1−θ2))
Using the identity 1+cos(x)=2cos2(x/2),
∣eiθ1+eiθ2∣2=4cos2(2θ1−θ2)∣eiθ1+eiθ2∣=2cos(2θ1−θ2)≤2Explanation: This approach provides a trigonometric verification using polar form and trigonometric identities.
Conclusion for Statement I: Both methods show that ∣z1∣z1+∣z2∣z2≤2 is always true. Thus, Statement I is correct.
2. Analysis of Statement II
Step 1: Define the common ratio.
Let ∣y−z∣a=∣z−x∣b=∣x−y∣c=λ, where λ>0.
Then a=λ∣y−z∣, b=λ∣z−x∣, and c=λ∣x−y∣.
Explanation: Introducing the common ratio helps simplify the given condition.
Step 2: Simplify each term in the sum.
Consider y−za2. Substituting a=λ∣y−z∣, we get y−za2=y−zλ2∣y−z∣2.
Since ∣y−z∣2=(y−z)(y−z)=(y−z)(yˉ−zˉ), we have
y−za2=y−zλ2(y−z)(yˉ−zˉ)=λ2(yˉ−zˉ).
Similarly, z−xb2=λ2(zˉ−xˉ) and x−yc2=λ2(xˉ−yˉ).
Explanation: Using ∣w∣2=wwˉ allows us to cancel terms and simplify the expressions.
Step 3: Sum the simplified terms.
y−za2+z−xb2+x−yc2=λ2(yˉ−zˉ)+λ2(zˉ−xˉ)+λ2(xˉ−yˉ)=λ2(yˉ−zˉ+zˉ−xˉ+xˉ−yˉ)=λ2(0)=0.
Explanation: The terms telescope and sum to zero.
Conclusion for Statement II: The expression y−za2+z−xb2+x−yc2 evaluates to 0, not 1. Therefore, Statement II is incorrect.
Common Mistakes & Tips
Remember to use the triangle inequality correctly: ∣z1+z2∣≤∣z1∣+∣z2∣.
Don't forget the property ∣z∣2=zzˉ when dealing with moduli and conjugates.
Always check for potential simplifications like telescoping sums.
Summary
Statement I is correct, as shown by the triangle inequality and polar form representation. Statement II is incorrect, as the given expression simplifies to 0, not 1. Therefore, the correct option is (B).