If ∫04π1+sinxcosxsin2xdx=a1loge(3a)+b3π, where a,b∈N, then a+b is equal to _________.
Answer: 0
Solution
Key Concepts and Formulas
Trigonometric Identities:
sin2x+cos2x=1
1+tan2x=sec2x
sin(2x)=2sinxcosx
Definite Integration Techniques:
Substitution method: If u=g(x), then du=g′(x)dx. The limits of integration also change according to ulower=g(xlower) and uupper=g(xupper).
Integral of the form ∫a+bsin(2x)1dx.
Integral of the form ∫a+btanxsec2xdx.
Logarithm Properties: loge(a/b)=logea−logeb.
Step-by-Step Solution
Let the given integral be I.
I=∫04π1+sinxcosxsin2xdx
Step 1: Manipulate the integrand to introduce tanx and sec2x.
To achieve this, we divide both the numerator and the denominator by cos2x.
I=∫04πcos2x1+cos2xsinxcosxcos2xsin2xdx
Using the identities tan2x=cos2xsin2x and sec2x=cos2x1, we get:
I=∫04πsec2x+tanxtan2xdx
Step 2: Express sec2x in terms of tanx.
Using the identity sec2x=1+tan2x, we substitute this into the integral:
I=∫04π(1+tan2x)+tanxtan2xdx
Rearranging the terms in the denominator, we have:
I=∫04π1+tanx+tan2xtan2xdx
Step 3: Perform a substitution to simplify the integral.
Let t=tanx. Then, dt=sec2xdx. This substitution doesn't directly fit the current form of the integral.
Instead, let's try a different approach by adding and subtracting cos2x in the numerator, or by manipulating the denominator.
Let's go back to the form:
I=∫04π1+sinxcosxsin2xdx
Multiply numerator and denominator by 2:
I=21∫04π2+sin(2x)2sin2xdx
Using 2sin2x=1−cos(2x):
I=21∫04π2+sin(2x)1−cos(2x)dxI=21∫04π2+sin(2x)1dx−21∫04π2+sin(2x)cos(2x)dx
Step 4: Evaluate the second integral.
Let u=2+sin(2x). Then du=2cos(2x)dx, which means cos(2x)dx=21du.
When x=0, u=2+sin(0)=2.
When x=4π, u=2+sin(2π)=2+1=3.
So, the second integral becomes:
−21∫23u1(21du)=−41∫23u1du=−41[loge∣u∣]23=−41(loge3−loge2)=−41loge(23)
Step 5: Evaluate the first integral.I1=21∫04π2+sin(2x)1dx
To solve this, we use the substitution t=tanx. Then dt=sec2xdx, so dx=1+t2dt.
Also, sin(2x)=1+tan2x2tanx=1+t22t.
When x=0, t=tan0=0.
When x=4π, t=tan(4π)=1.
I1=21∫012+1+t22t11+t2dtI1=21∫011+t22(1+t2)+2t11+t2dtI1=21∫012+2t2+2t1+t21+t2dtI1=21∫012t2+2t+21dtI1=41∫01t2+t+11dt
Complete the square in the denominator: t2+t+1=(t+21)2+1−41=(t+21)2+43.
I1=41∫01(t+21)2+(23)21dt
This is in the form ∫x2+a21dx=a1arctan(ax).
Here, x=t+21 and a=23.
I1=41[231arctan(23t+21)]01I1=41[32arctan(32t+1)]01I1=231[arctan(32(1)+1)−arctan(32(0)+1)]I1=231[arctan(33)−arctan(31)]I1=231[arctan(3)−arctan(31)]
We know that arctan(3)=3π and arctan(31)=6π.
I1=231(3π−6π)=231(62π−π)=231(6π)=123π
Step 6: Combine the results.
The total integral I is I1 minus the second integral we calculated in Step 4.
I=123π−(−41loge(23))I=123π+41loge(23)
The given form is a1loge(3a)+b3π.
Comparing our result with the given form:
41loge(23)=41loge3−41loge2. This does not match the form a1loge(3a).
Let's re-examine the given format and our result.
The given form is a1loge(3a)+b3π.
Our result is 41loge(23)+123π.
There seems to be a mismatch in the logarithmic term. Let's check the algebraic manipulation of the logarithmic term.
The given form has loge(3a). If we assume a=4, then we have 41loge(34)=41(loge4−loge3).
Our calculation gave 41loge(23)=41(loge3−loge2).
Let's re-evaluate the second integral: −21∫04π2+sin(2x)cos(2x)dx.
Let u=2+sin(2x). du=2cos(2x)dx.
When x=0,u=2. When x=π/4,u=3.
−21∫23u12du=−41[logeu]23=−41(loge3−loge2)=−41loge(23).
So the integral is I=I1−41loge(23)=123π−41loge(23).
This is equal to 123π+41loge(32).
The given form is a1loge(3a)+b3π.
Comparing the b3π term, we have 123π=b3π, which implies b=12.
Now let's consider the logarithmic term. We have 41loge(32).
The given form has a1loge(3a).
Let's try to match 41loge(32) with a1loge(3a).
If a=2, then 21loge(32). This is not a match.
If a=4, then 41loge(34). This is not a match.
Let's re-examine the problem statement or my derivation.
The given form is a1loge(3a)+b3π.
Our result is I=123π+41loge(32).
Let's assume the given form is correct and try to match.
From the b3π part, we get b=12.
Now we need to match 41loge(32) with a1loge(3a).
This means 41(loge2−loge3)=a1(logea−loge3).
Let's go back to the original integral and try another manipulation for the logarithmic part.
Perhaps the original integral was intended to produce a simpler logarithmic term.
Let's consider the possibility of an error in my calculation or interpretation.
The given answer is 0. This implies a+b=0. Since a,b∈N, this is impossible. There must be a mistake in the problem statement or the provided correct answer.
Let's assume the correct answer is indeed 0, which means a+b=0. This is not possible for a,b∈N.
However, if the question meant a,b are integers, then a+b=0 could be possible. But the problem states a,b∈N.
Let's assume the provided "Correct Answer: 0" is the value of a+b. This implies a+b=0.
Since a,b∈N, this is not possible. There is a high probability of an error in the provided correct answer.
Let's proceed with the calculated values of a and b based on the structure of the result.
We found b=12.
We need to match 41loge(32) with a1loge(3a).
Let's rewrite 41loge(32)=41(loge2−loge3).
Let's rewrite the given form: a1logea−a1loge3.
If we assume a=2, then we get 21loge2−21loge3. This does not match 41loge2−41loge3.
If we assume a=4, then we get 41loge4−41loge3=41(2loge2)−41loge3=21loge2−41loge3. This does not match.
Let's try to force the logarithmic term to match a specific 'a'.
If the logarithmic term was 21loge(32), then a=2.
If the logarithmic term was 41loge(34), then a=4.
Let's re-check the integration of t2+t+11.
I1=41∫01(t+21)2+(23)21dt=41[32arctan(32t+1)]01=231[arctan(3)−arctan(31)]=231(3π−6π)=2316π=123π. This part is correct.
The second integral: −41[logeu]23=−41(loge3−loge2)=−41loge(23).
So I=123π−41loge(23)=123π+41loge(32).
Given form: a1loge(3a)+b3π.
Comparing: b=12.
We need 41loge(32)=a1loge(3a).
This implies 41(loge2−loge3)=a1(logea−loge3).
Let's consider if there's a typo in the question or the provided answer. If the question was designed such that a simple integer answer for a+b is obtained, and the provided answer is 0, it strongly suggests an error.
However, if we are forced to match the form, let's assume there is a specific value of 'a' that makes this work.
Let's rewrite 41loge(32) as a1loge(3a).
This means a(loge2−loge3)=4(logea−loge3).
aloge2−aloge3=4logea−4loge3.
loge(2a/3a)=loge(a4/34).
3a2a=34a4.
2a34=a43a.
If a=2, 2234=4×81=324. 2432=16×9=144. Not equal.
If a=3, 2334=8×81=648. 3433=81×27=2187. Not equal.
If a=4, 2434=16×81=1296. 4434=256×81=20736. Not equal.
It is highly probable that the provided correct answer is incorrect.
Let's assume there's a typo in the question and it should lead to integer values of a and b.
If we assume the logarithmic term was 21loge(32), then a=2.
In this case, a=2 and b=12. a+b=2+12=14.
If we assume the logarithmic term was 41loge(34), then a=4.
In this case, a=4 and b=12. a+b=4+12=16.
Given the structure of the problem and the provided correct answer being 0, which is impossible for a,b∈N, I cannot rigorously derive a+b=0.
Assuming there might be a typo in the question or the provided answer.
Let's assume for a moment that the question intended for a=3.
Then the logarithmic term is 31loge(33)=31loge(1)=0.
This would mean our integral's logarithmic part is 0.
41loge(32)=0, which is false.
Let's consider the possibility that the given form is a1loge(a3)+b3π.
Then 41loge(32)=a1loge(a3).
a(loge2−loge3)=4(loge3−logea).
aloge2−aloge3=4loge3−4logea.
loge(2a/3a)=loge(34/a4).
2a/3a=34/a4.
2aa4=3a34=3a+4.
If a=1, 2114=2. 31+4=35=243.
If a=2, 2224=4×16=64. 32+4=36=729.
If a=3, 2334=8×81=648. 33+4=37=2187.
Given the constraint that I must derive the provided answer, and the provided answer is 0, which implies a+b=0. This is impossible for a,b∈N. There is a fundamental inconsistency.
Let's assume there is a typo in the question and it should be a+b=14 or a+b=16.
Let's assume the problem meant to write the integral as:
I=41loge(23)+123π
And the given form is:
a1loge(3a)+b3π
We have b=12.
We need 41loge(23)=a1loge(3a).
41(loge3−loge2)=a1(logea−loge3).
a(loge3−loge2)=4(logea−loge3).
aloge3−aloge2=4logea−4loge3.
aloge3+4loge3=4logea+aloge2.
(a+4)loge3=loge(a42a).
loge(3a+4)=loge(a42a).
3a+4=a42a.
If a=1, 35=243. 1421=2.
If a=2, 36=729. 2422=16×4=64.
If a=3, 37=2187. 3423=81×8=648.
If a=4, 38=6561. 4424=256×16=4096.
Since the provided "Correct Answer: 0" is impossible for a,b∈N, I cannot proceed to derive a+b=0. There is a strong indication of an error in the problem statement or the provided answer.
However, if we assume the question is correct and the answer is 0, it implies a+b=0. This is only possible if a,b are not natural numbers.
Common Mistakes & Tips
Trigonometric Simplification: Ensure all trigonometric identities are applied correctly, especially when converting between sin,cos,tan,sec.
Substitution Limits: When using substitution in definite integrals, always remember to change the limits of integration according to the new variable.
Algebraic Manipulation: The form of the answer suggests a specific manipulation of the logarithmic terms might be required. Careful comparison is needed.
Error in Provided Answer: If the derived values of a and b do not lead to the given correct answer, re-examine the problem statement and the solution for potential typos or fundamental errors. In this case, the provided correct answer seems inconsistent with the problem statement for a,b∈N.
Summary
The integral was evaluated using trigonometric identities and substitution. The integral was split into two parts, one of which yielded a logarithmic term and the other an arctan term. After performing the integrations and applying the limits, the result was obtained in the form 123π+41loge(32). Comparing this with the given form a1loge(3a)+b3π, we found b=12. However, matching the logarithmic term with the given form led to an equation 3a+4=a42a, which does not have a simple integer solution for a∈N. The provided correct answer of 0 for a+b is impossible for a,b∈N.