If \int_\limits{-0.15}^{0.15}\left|100 x^{2}-1\right| d x=\frac{k}{3000}, then k is equal to ___________.
Answer: 0
Solution
Key Concepts and Formulas
Even Function Property: A function f(x) is even if f(−x)=f(x). For an even function, ∫−aaf(x)dx=2∫0af(x)dx.
Absolute Value Definition:∣u∣=u if u≥0, and ∣u∣=−u if u<0.
Definite Integral Properties: To evaluate ∫ab∣f(x)∣dx, we need to find the roots of f(x) within [a,b] and split the integral into subintervals where f(x) has a constant sign.
Step-by-Step Solution
Step 1: Analyze the integrand and check for symmetry.
The integrand is ∣100x2−1∣. Let f(x)=100x2−1.
We check if f(x) is an even function: f(−x)=100(−x)2−1=100x2−1=f(x).
Since f(−x)=f(x), the function f(x)=100x2−1 is an even function.
The integral is from −0.15 to 0.15, which is of the form ∫−aag(x)dx.
Therefore, we can use the property of even functions: ∫−0.150.15∣100x2−1∣dx=2∫00.15∣100x2−1∣dx.
This simplifies the integration limits.
Step 2: Determine the sign of the expression inside the absolute value.
We need to find where 100x2−1≥0 and where 100x2−1<0.
The roots of 100x2−1=0 are 100x2=1, which gives x2=1001, so x=±101=±0.1.
Since we are integrating from 0 to 0.15, the relevant intervals are [0,0.1] and [0.1,0.15].
For x∈[0,0.1), let's pick x=0.05. Then 100(0.05)2−1=100(0.0025)−1=0.25−1=−0.75<0.
So, for x∈[0,0.1), ∣100x2−1∣=−(100x2−1)=1−100x2.
For x∈[0.1,0.15], let's pick x=0.12. Then 100(0.12)2−1=100(0.0144)−1=1.44−1=0.44>0.
So, for x∈[0.1,0.15], ∣100x2−1∣=100x2−1.
Step 3: Split the integral based on the sign of the expression.
Using the results from Step 2 and the even function property from Step 1:
∫−0.150.15∣100x2−1∣dx=2∫00.15∣100x2−1∣dx=2(∫00.1∣100x2−1∣dx+∫0.10.15∣100x2−1∣dx)=2(∫00.1(1−100x2)dx+∫0.10.15(100x2−1)dx)
Step 4: Evaluate the integrals.
First integral:
∫00.1(1−100x2)dx=[x−3100x3]00.1=(0.1−3100(0.1)3)−(0−0)=0.1−3100(0.001)=0.1−30.1=33(0.1)−0.1=30.3−0.1=30.2
Second integral:
∫0.10.15(100x2−1)dx=[3100x3−x]0.10.15=(3100(0.15)3−0.15)−(3100(0.1)3−0.1)
Calculate (0.15)3=(15×10−2)3=153×10−6=3375×10−6=0.003375.
Calculate (0.1)3=0.001.
=(3100×0.003375−0.15)−(3100×0.001−0.1)=(30.3375−0.15)−(30.1−0.1)=(0.1125−0.15)−(30.1−0.3)=−0.0375−(3−0.2)=−0.0375+30.2
Step 5: Combine the results and find the value of k.
Now, substitute the values of the integrals back into the expression from Step 3:
∫−0.150.15∣100x2−1∣dx=2(30.2+(−0.0375+30.2))=2(30.2−0.0375+30.2)=2(30.4−0.0375)
Convert 0.0375 to a fraction: 0.0375=10000375=80×1253×125=803.
=2(30.4−803)=2(304−803)=2(152−803)
Find a common denominator for 15 and 80. 15=3×5, 80=16×5=24×5.
The least common multiple is 3×16×5=240.
=2(15×162×16−80×33×3)=2(24032−2409)=2(24032−9)=2(24023)=12023
We are given that ∫−0.150.15∣100x2−1∣dx=3000k.
So, we have 12023=3000k.
To find k, we can cross-multiply or multiply both sides by 3000:
k=12023×3000k=23×1203000k=23×12300k=23×25k=575
Let's recheck the calculation for the second integral.
∫0.10.15(100x2−1)dx=[3100x3−x]0.10.15=(3100(0.15)3−0.15)−(3100(0.1)3−0.1)=3100[(0.15)3−(0.1)3]−(0.15−0.1)=3100[0.003375−0.001]−0.05=3100[0.002375]−0.05=30.2375−0.05=30.2375−0.15=30.0875
Now, let's combine the integrals again:
2(∫00.1(1−100x2)dx+∫0.10.15(100x2−1)dx)=2(30.2+30.0875)=2(30.2+0.0875)=2(30.2875)=30.575
We are given that this equals 3000k.
30.575=3000kk=30.575×3000k=0.575×1000k=575
Let's re-evaluate 0.0375+30.2 from Step 5.
−0.0375+30.2=−803+151=240−9+16=2407
This calculation was for the second integral from Step 4.
The second integral was 30.2−0.0375=30.2−803=24016−9=2407. This is incorrect.
Let's redo the second integral calculation:
∫0.10.15(100x2−1)dx=[3100x3−x]0.10.15=(3100(0.15)3−0.15)−(3100(0.1)3−0.1)=3100((0.15)3−(0.1)3)−(0.15−0.1)=3100(0.003375−0.001)−0.05=3100(0.002375)−0.05=30.2375−30.15=30.2375−0.15=30.0875
This calculation is correct.
Now, let's re-evaluate the sum from Step 5:
2(∫00.1(1−100x2)dx+∫0.10.15(100x2−1)dx)=2(30.2+30.0875)=2(30.2+0.0875)=2(30.2875)=30.575
This is also correct.
We are given ∫−0.150.15∣100x2−1∣dx=3000k.
So, 30.575=3000k.
k=30.575×3000=0.575×1000=575.
Let's re-examine the problem and the given correct answer. The correct answer is 0. This suggests a significant error in the calculation or interpretation.
Let's check the absolute value expression again.
∣100x2−1∣. Roots are x=±0.1.
For x∈[−0.15,−0.1), 100x2−1>0. For example, x=−0.12, 100(−0.12)2−1=100(0.0144)−1=1.44−1=0.44>0.
For x∈(−0.1,0.1), 100x2−1<0. For example, x=0, 100(0)2−1=−1<0.
For x∈(0.1,0.15], 100x2−1>0. For example, x=0.12, 100(0.12)2−1=0.44>0.
The integral is ∫−0.150.15∣100x2−1∣dx.
Since the integrand is even, this is 2∫00.15∣100x2−1∣dx.
We split the integral at x=0.1:
2(∫00.1∣100x2−1∣dx+∫0.10.15∣100x2−1∣dx)
For x∈[0,0.1), 100x2−1<0, so ∣100x2−1∣=−(100x2−1)=1−100x2.
For x∈[0.1,0.15], 100x2−1>0, so ∣100x2−1∣=100x2−1.
So the integral becomes:
2(∫00.1(1−100x2)dx+∫0.10.15(100x2−1)dx)
Let's re-evaluate the first integral:
∫00.1(1−100x2)dx=[x−3100x3]00.1=(0.1−3100(0.1)3)−0=0.1−3100(0.001)=0.1−30.1=30.3−0.1=30.2. This is correct.
Let's re-evaluate the second integral:
∫0.10.15(100x2−1)dx=[3100x3−x]0.10.15=(3100(0.15)3−0.15)−(3100(0.1)3−0.1)=3100(0.153−0.13)−(0.15−0.1)=3100(0.003375−0.001)−0.05=3100(0.002375)−0.05=30.2375−0.05=30.2375−0.15=30.0875. This is correct.
Summing them up:
2(30.2+30.0875)=2(30.2875)=30.575.
Setting this equal to 3000k:
30.575=3000kk=30.575×3000=0.575×1000=575.
There might be a misunderstanding of the question or the correct answer. Let's assume the correct answer is indeed 0 and try to find a reason.
If the integral was 0, it would imply cancellations. This is unlikely for an absolute value of a non-negative function over a symmetric interval.
Let's consider a potential mistake in interpreting the limits or the function.
The limits are −0.15 and 0.15. The function is ∣100x2−1∣.
Roots are at x=±0.1.
Let's re-read the question carefully. "If ∫−0.150.15100x2−1dx=3000k, then k is equal to __________."
Let's check the integration of the full range without splitting:
∫∣100x2−1∣dx.
If we integrate 100x2−1 from −0.15 to 0.15:
[3100x3−x]−0.150.15=(3100(0.15)3−0.15)−(3100(−0.15)3−(−0.15))=3100(0.153−(−0.15)3)−(0.15−0.15)=3100(0.003375−(−0.003375))−0=3100(0.00675)=30.675=0.225.
This is the integral of 100x2−1, not ∣100x2−1∣.
Let's consider the possibility that the question or the correct answer provided is incorrect. However, I must derive the provided correct answer.
If k=0, then the integral must be 0.
∫−0.150.15100x2−1dx=0.
This is impossible because the integrand ∣100x2−1∣ is always non-negative and is strictly positive over most of the interval [−0.15,0.15]. The integral of a non-negative function over a non-zero interval cannot be zero unless the function is identically zero, which is not the case here.
Let's assume there's a typo in the question, and it was meant to be something else that results in k=0.
For example, if the integral was ∫−0.10.1(100x2−1)dx, then:
[3100x3−x]−0.10.1=(3100(0.1)3−0.1)−(3100(−0.1)3−(−0.1))=(30.1−0.1)−(−30.1+0.1)=30.1−0.1+30.1−0.1=30.2−0.2=30.2−0.6=−30.4. This is not 0.
If the integral was ∫−0.10.1∣100x2−1∣dx:
2∫00.1∣100x2−1∣dx=2∫00.1(1−100x2)dx=2[x−3100x3]00.1=2(0.1−30.1)=2(30.2)=30.4.
There is a strong possibility of an error in the provided correct answer. My calculations consistently lead to k=575.
Let's re-verify the problem statement from a reliable source if possible. Assuming the problem statement is correct and the answer k=0 is correct, there must be a very subtle point missed.
Could there be a property of definite integrals that I am overlooking, specifically for this form?
The function 100x2−1 is a parabola opening upwards, with roots at ±0.1.
The function ∣100x2−1∣ is non-negative. The integral of a non-negative function over a non-zero interval is always positive.
Therefore, ∫−0.150.15100x2−1dx must be positive.
If the integral is positive, then 3000k must be positive, which means k must be positive.
This contradicts the given correct answer k=0.
Given the constraint to work backwards from the correct answer, and the contradiction encountered, it's impossible to provide a step-by-step derivation that logically leads to k=0 from the given problem statement and standard calculus principles.
However, if we are forced to provide a reasoning that leads to k=0, it would imply that the integral itself evaluates to 0. This can only happen if the integrand is identically zero over the interval of integration, or if there's a fundamental misunderstanding of the question. Since the integrand ∣100x2−1∣ is not identically zero, and is in fact positive over most of the interval, the integral cannot be zero.
Let's assume, hypothetically, that the question intended to ask for a different integral that evaluates to zero. For example, if the question was about a definite integral that results in cancellation of positive and negative areas, and the absolute value was a red herring or a typo. But this is pure speculation.
Since I am required to reach the given answer, and my calculations are sound and lead to k=575, there is a discrepancy. I cannot logically derive k=0.
Let's assume there is a typo in the question and the integral was meant to be ∫−0.10.1(100x2−1)dx.
Then 2∫00.1(100x2−1)dx=2[3100x3−x]00.1=2(3100(0.1)3−0.1)=2(30.1−0.1)=2(30.1−0.3)=2(−30.2)=−30.4.
This does not lead to k=0.
Given the absolute impossibility of the integral of a positive function being zero, and the requirement to reach the answer k=0, I cannot fulfill the request without making unfounded assumptions or fabricating a flawed solution.
However, if the question was designed such that the net signed area is zero, for example, if it was ∫−aaf(x)dx where f(x) is an odd function, then the integral would be zero. But ∣100x2−1∣ is an even function.
Common Mistakes & Tips
Incorrectly determining the sign of the expression inside the absolute value: Always find the roots of the expression and test values in each interval.
Forgetting the even function property: Using ∫−aaf(x)dx=2∫0af(x)dx can simplify calculations.
Arithmetic errors during evaluation: Be meticulous with calculations involving fractions and decimals.
Summary
The problem requires evaluating a definite integral involving an absolute value function. The integrand ∣100x2−1∣ is an even function, allowing simplification of the integral limits. The expression inside the absolute value changes sign at x=±0.1. By splitting the integral into intervals where the expression is positive and negative, and performing the integration, we obtain a value for the integral. Equating this value to 3000k allows us to solve for k.
Based on standard calculus principles and meticulous calculation, the integral evaluates to 30.575. Equating this to 3000k yields k=575. However, if the intended correct answer is k=0, there is a significant discrepancy. As an AI assistant, I am unable to reconcile this discrepancy without further clarification or correction of the problem statement or the provided answer.
Given the constraint to reach the "Correct Answer: 0", and the impossibility of doing so with the provided problem, I cannot proceed further.