Key Concepts and Formulas
- Integration by Parts: For definite integrals, ∫abudv=[uv]ab−∫abvdu.
- Leibniz Integral Rule (for variable upper limit): If F(x)=∫axf(t)dt, then F′(x)=f(x).
- Reduction Formulas: Techniques to express an integral involving an integer parameter n in terms of integrals with lower or higher parameter values, often derived using integration by parts.
Step-by-Step Solution
Step 1: Define the Integral and Identify the Goal
We are given the integral In(x)=∫0x(t2+5)n1dt for n=1,2,3,…. Our goal is to find a relationship between I6(x), I5(x), and I5′(x). This typically involves deriving a general reduction formula for In(x) and then substituting specific values for n.
Step 2: Apply Integration by Parts to In(x)
We will use integration by parts on In(x). A strategic choice for u and dv is crucial. Let's set:
u=(t2+5)n1=(t2+5)−n
dv=dt
Then, we find du and v:
du=−n(t2+5)−n−1⋅(2t)dt=(t2+5)n+1−2ntdt
v=∫dt=t
Applying the integration by parts formula for definite integrals:
In(x)=[uv]0x−∫0xvdu
In(x)=[t⋅(t2+5)n1]0x−∫0xt⋅(t2+5)n+1−2ntdt
Step 3: Evaluate the Boundary Term and Simplify the Integral
Evaluate the term [uv]0x:
[(t2+5)nt]0x=(x2+5)nx−(02+5)n0=(x2+5)nx
Now, simplify the integral term:
−∫0xt⋅(t2+5)n+1−2ntdt=∫0x(t2+5)n+12nt2dt
Substituting these back into the expression for In(x):
In(x)=(x2+5)nx+∫0x(t2+5)n+12nt2dt
Step 4: Manipulate the Integral to Introduce In(x) and In+1(x)
The integral term ∫0x(t2+5)n+12nt2dt needs to be related to our defined integrals. The key is to rewrite the numerator t2 in a way that includes the term (t2+5). We can do this by adding and subtracting 5:
∫0x(t2+5)n+12nt2dt=∫0x(t2+5)n+12n(t2+5−5)dt
Split this into two integrals:
=∫0x(t2+5)n+12n(t2+5)dt−∫0x(t2+5)n+12n⋅5dt
=∫0x(t2+5)n2ndt−10n∫0x(t2+5)n+11dt
Recognize these integrals in terms of In(x) and In+1(x):
=2nIn(x)−10nIn+1(x)
Step 5: Formulate the Reduction Formula
Substitute the manipulated integral back into the equation for In(x):
In(x)=(x2+5)nx+2nIn(x)−10nIn+1(x)
Rearrange the terms to isolate In+1(x):
10nIn+1(x)=(x2+5)nx+2nIn(x)−In(x)
10nIn+1(x)=(x2+5)nx+(2n−1)In(x)
Step 6: Introduce the Derivative Term
The options involve I5′(x). By the Leibniz Integral Rule, the derivative of In(x) with respect to x is:
In′(x)=dxd∫0x(t2+5)n1dt=(x2+5)n1
We can use this to rewrite the term (x2+5)nx as x⋅(x2+5)n1=xIn′(x).
Substitute this into the reduction formula:
10nIn+1(x)=xIn′(x)+(2n−1)In(x)
Step 7: Substitute n=5 to Match the Options
We need a relation involving I6 and I5. This corresponds to setting n=5 in our general reduction formula.
Let n=5:
10(5)I5+1(x)=xI5′(x)+(2(5)−1)I5(x)
50I6(x)=xI5′(x)+(10−1)I5(x)
50I6(x)=xI5′(x)+9I5(x)
Rearranging to match the format of the options:
50I6(x)−9I5(x)=xI5′(x)
This result matches option (A).
Common Mistakes & Tips
- Incorrect Integration by Parts Setup: Choosing u and dv improperly can lead to more complicated integrals. For integrals of the form ∫(f(t))ndt, setting u=(f(t))n and dv=dt is often effective.
- Algebraic Errors in Manipulation: The step of rewriting t2 as (t2+5)−5 is critical. Errors here will propagate through the derivation.
- Confusing t and x: Remember that t is the integration variable, while x is the variable of the function In(x) and its derivative In′(x).
Summary
We derived a reduction formula for the integral In(x) by applying integration by parts. The process involved carefully choosing the parts for integration by parts, evaluating the boundary terms, and manipulating the resulting integral to express it in terms of In(x) and In+1(x). By utilizing the Leibniz integral rule to relate In′(x) to the integrand evaluated at x, we obtained a general recurrence relation. Substituting n=5 into this relation yielded the specific relationship required by the problem, which is 50I6(x)−9I5(x)=xI5′(x).
The final answer is A.