Absolute Value Function:∣a∣=a if a≥0, and ∣a∣=−a if a<0. This means we need to identify intervals where the expression inside the absolute value is positive or negative.
Definite Integral Properties: For a continuous function f(x) and constants a and b, the definite integral ∫abf(x)dx can be split into a sum of integrals over sub-intervals: ∫abf(x)dx=∫acf(x)dx+∫cbf(x)dx, where a<c<b.
Piecewise Function Integration: When integrating a piecewise function, we integrate each piece over its respective interval and sum the results.
Step-by-Step Solution
We need to evaluate the integral I=0∫2∣∣x−1∣−x∣dx.
Step 1: Analyze the innermost absolute value, ∣x−1∣.
The expression x−1 changes sign at x=1.
If x≥1, then x−1≥0, so ∣x−1∣=x−1.
If x<1, then x−1<0, so ∣x−1∣=−(x−1)=1−x.
Since our integration interval is [0,2], we need to split this interval at x=1.
Step 2: Evaluate the expression inside the outer absolute value, ∣x−1∣−x, in the sub-intervals [0,1) and [1,2].
For the interval 0≤x<1:
Here, ∣x−1∣=1−x.
So, ∣x−1∣−x=(1−x)−x=1−2x.
We need to determine the sign of 1−2x in this interval.
1−2x=0 when x=1/2.
If 0≤x<1/2, then 1−2x>0. So ∣1−2x∣=1−2x.
If 1/2≤x<1, then 1−2x≤0. So ∣1−2x∣=−(1−2x)=2x−1.
For the interval 1≤x≤2:
Here, ∣x−1∣=x−1.
So, ∣x−1∣−x=(x−1)−x=−1.
The expression −1 is always negative.
Therefore, ∣−1∣=−(−1)=1.
Step 3: Rewrite the integral by splitting it into sub-intervals based on the analysis in Step 2.
The critical points within the interval [0,2] are x=1/2 and x=1. So we split the integral into three parts: [0,1/2], [1/2,1], and [1,2].
Now, substitute the simplified expressions for the integrand in each interval:
For 0≤x<1/2:∣x−1∣−x=1−2x, and ∣1−2x∣=1−2x.
The integrand is 1−2x.
For 1/2≤x<1:∣x−1∣−x=1−2x, and ∣1−2x∣=−(1−2x)=2x−1.
The integrand is 2x−1.
For 1≤x≤2:∣x−1∣−x=−1, and ∣−1∣=1.
The integrand is 1.
So, the integral becomes:
I=0∫1/2(1−2x)dx+1/2∫1(2x−1)dx+1∫21dx
Step 4: Evaluate each definite integral.
First integral:0∫1/2(1−2x)dx=[x−x2]01/2=(21−(21)2)−(0−02)=21−41=41
Second integral:1/2∫1(2x−1)dx=[x2−x]1/21=(12−1)−((21)2−21)=(1−1)−(41−21)=0−(−41)=41
Third integral:1∫21dx=[x]12=2−1=1
Step 5: Sum the results of the three integrals to find the total value of the integral.I=41+41+1=21+1=23
Let's recheck the analysis.
Revisiting Step 2 and 3 to ensure accuracy.
The expression inside the outer absolute value is f(x)=∣x−1∣−x.
We need to find where f(x)=0.
∣x−1∣−x=0⟹∣x−1∣=x.
For ∣x−1∣=x to have a solution, we must have x≥0 (since ∣x−1∣ is always non-negative).
Case 1: x−1≥0, which means x≥1.
In this case, ∣x−1∣=x−1. So, x−1=x, which implies −1=0. This is impossible. So there are no solutions for x≥1.
Case 2: x−1<0, which means x<1.
In this case, ∣x−1∣=−(x−1)=1−x. So, 1−x=x, which implies 1=2x, so x=1/2.
This solution x=1/2 is consistent with the condition x<1.
So, the expression ∣x−1∣−x changes sign at x=1/2.
Let's re-evaluate the sign of ∣x−1∣−x on the intervals.
Interval [0,1/2):
Let's pick a test point, say x=0.
∣0−1∣−0=∣−1∣−0=1−0=1>0.
So, for 0≤x<1/2, ∣x−1∣−x>0.
This means ∣∣x−1∣−x∣=∣x−1∣−x.
In this interval, ∣x−1∣=1−x.
So, the integrand is (1−x)−x=1−2x.
Interval [1/2,1):
Let's pick a test point, say x=0.75.
∣0.75−1∣−0.75=∣−0.25∣−0.75=0.25−0.75=−0.5<0.
So, for 1/2≤x<1, ∣x−1∣−x<0.
This means ∣∣x−1∣−x∣=−(∣x−1∣−x)=x−∣x−1∣.
In this interval, ∣x−1∣=1−x.
So, the integrand is x−(1−x)=x−1+x=2x−1.
Interval [1,2]:
Let's pick a test point, say x=1.5.
∣1.5−1∣−1.5=∣0.5∣−1.5=0.5−1.5=−1<0.
So, for 1≤x≤2, ∣x−1∣−x<0.
This means ∣∣x−1∣−x∣=−(∣x−1∣−x)=x−∣x−1∣.
In this interval, ∣x−1∣=x−1.
So, the integrand is x−(x−1)=x−x+1=1.
The integral splits as follows:
I=0∫1/2(1−2x)dx+1/2∫1(2x−1)dx+1∫21dx
This is the same as before. Let's check the calculations carefully.
Step 4 (re-evaluation): Evaluate each definite integral.
First integral:0∫1/2(1−2x)dx=[x−x2]01/2=(21−(21)2)−(0−02)=21−41=41
This is correct.
Second integral:1/2∫1(2x−1)dx=[x2−x]1/21=(12−1)−((21)2−21)=(1−1)−(41−21)=0−(−41)=41
This is correct.
Third integral:1∫21dx=[x]12=2−1=1
This is correct.
Step 5 (re-evaluation): Sum the results of the three integrals.I=41+41+1=21+1=23
There seems to be a discrepancy with the provided correct answer of 0. Let's re-examine the problem statement and my analysis.
The expression is ∣∣x−1∣−x∣.
Let's consider the function g(x)=∣x−1∣−x.
We found that g(x)>0 for 0≤x<1/2.
We found that g(x)<0 for 1/2≤x<1.
We found that g(x)<0 for 1≤x≤2.
So, the integral is ∫02∣g(x)∣dx.
∫02∣g(x)∣dx=∫01/2g(x)dx+∫1/21(−g(x))dx+∫12(−g(x))dx=∫01/2(∣x−1∣−x)dx+∫1/21−(∣x−1∣−x)dx+∫12−(∣x−1∣−x)dx
On [0,1/2): ∣x−1∣=1−x. So g(x)=(1−x)−x=1−2x.
∫01/2(1−2x)dx=[x−x2]01/2=21−41=41
On [1/2,1): ∣x−1∣=1−x. So g(x)=(1−x)−x=1−2x.
Here g(x)≤0. So ∣g(x)∣=−(1−2x)=2x−1.
∫1/21(2x−1)dx=[x2−x]1/21=(1−1)−(41−21)=0−(−41)=41
On [1,2]: ∣x−1∣=x−1. So g(x)=(x−1)−x=−1.
Here g(x)=−1<0. So ∣g(x)∣=∣−1∣=1.
∫121dx=[x]12=2−1=1
Summing these: 41+41+1=23.
Let's consider the possibility that the question or the correct answer is misstated. If the integral were ∫02(∣x−1∣−x)dx, then:
∫02(∣x−1∣−x)dx=∫01(1−2x)dx+∫12(−1)dx=[x−x2]01+[−x]12=(1−1)−(0−0)+(−2)−(−1)=0+(−2+1)=−1.
If the integral were ∫02(x−∣x−1∣)dx:
∫01(x−(1−x))dx+∫12(x−(x−1))dx=∫01(2x−1)dx+∫121dx=[x2−x]01+[x]12=(1−1)−(0−0)+(2−1)=0+1=1.
Let's re-examine the function f(x)=∣∣x−1∣−x∣.
We know that ∣x−1∣−x=1−2x for 0≤x<1.
And ∣x−1∣−x=−1 for 1≤x≤2.
So, the expression inside the outer absolute value is:
g(x)={1−2x−1if 0≤x<1if 1≤x≤2
Now, we take the absolute value of g(x):
∣g(x)∣={∣1−2x∣∣−1∣if 0≤x<1if 1≤x≤2
For the first case, ∣1−2x∣:
If 0≤x<1/2, then 1−2x>0, so ∣1−2x∣=1−2x.
If 1/2≤x<1, then 1−2x≤0, so ∣1−2x∣=−(1−2x)=2x−1.
For the second case, ∣−1∣=1.
So, the integrand is:
∣∣x−1∣−x∣=⎩⎨⎧1−2x2x−11if 0≤x<1/2if 1/2≤x<1if 1≤x≤2
This confirms the piecewise definition of the integrand used in Step 3. The calculations in Step 4 and Step 5 were correct based on this definition.
Let's consider a graphical interpretation.
Plot y=∣x−1∣. This is a V-shape with the vertex at (1,0).
Plot y=x. This is a line through the origin with slope 1.
Plot y=∣x−1∣−x.
For x<1, y=(1−x)−x=1−2x. This is a line with slope -2 passing through (0,1) and (1,−1).
For x≥1, y=(x−1)−x=−1. This is a horizontal line at y=−1.
So, the graph of y=∣x−1∣−x is a line segment from (0,1) to (1/2,0), then from (1/2,0) to (1,−1), and then from (1,−1) to (2,−1).
Now, plot y=∣∣x−1∣−x∣. This is the absolute value of the previous function.
For 0≤x<1/2, y=1−2x. This is the line segment from (0,1) to (1/2,0).
For 1/2≤x<1, y=−(1−2x)=2x−1. This is the line segment from (1/2,0) to (1,1).
For 1≤x≤2, y=∣−1∣=1. This is the horizontal line segment from (1,1) to (2,1).
The integral ∫02∣∣x−1∣−x∣dx is the area under this curve.
Area 1 (from x=0 to x=1/2): This is a triangle with base 1/2 and height 1. Area = (1/2)×(1/2)×1=1/4.
Area 2 (from x=1/2 to x=1): This is a triangle with base 1−1/2=1/2 and height 1. Area = (1/2)×(1/2)×1=1/4.
Area 3 (from x=1 to x=2): This is a rectangle with base 2−1=1 and height 1. Area = 1×1=1.
Total Area = 1/4+1/4+1=1/2+1=3/2.
The result 3/2 seems consistently obtained. Given the provided correct answer is 0, there might be a misunderstanding of the question or a typo in the question/answer.
Let's consider if the question was actually ∫02(∣x−1∣−x)dx and we are to find its absolute value. We calculated this to be -1. Its absolute value is 1.
If the question was ∫02(x−∣x−1∣)dx, we calculated this to be 1.
Could there be a simplification that leads to 0?
Consider the property ∫abf(x)dx=∫abf(a+b−x)dx.
Let I=0∫2∣∣x−1∣−x∣dx.
Let f(x)=∣∣x−1∣−x∣.
Then a=0,b=2, so a+b=2.
f(2−x)=∣∣(2−x)−1∣−(2−x)∣=∣∣1−x∣−2+x∣.
Since ∣1−x∣=∣x−1∣,
f(2−x)=∣∣x−1∣−2+x∣.
This does not seem to simplify to f(x) or −f(x) directly.
Let's re-examine the function g(x)=∣x−1∣−x.
The integral is ∫02∣g(x)∣dx.
We found g(x)=1−2x on [0,1) and g(x)=−1 on [1,2].
Consider the integral ∫02g(x)dx=∫01(1−2x)dx+∫12(−1)dx.
∫01(1−2x)dx=[x−x2]01=(1−1)−(0−0)=0.
∫12(−1)dx=[−x]12=−2−(−1)=−1.
So, ∫02g(x)dx=0+(−1)=−1.
The integral we are asked to evaluate is ∫02∣g(x)∣dx.
We know that ∣g(x)∣≥g(x).
So ∫02∣g(x)∣dx≥∫02g(x)dx.
This means ∫02∣g(x)∣dx≥−1.
Let's consider the possibility of symmetry.
The interval is [0,2]. The center is x=1.
Let's check the function h(x)=∣∣x−1∣−x∣.
h(1+u)=∣∣(1+u)−1∣−(1+u)∣=∣∣u∣−1−u∣.
h(1−u)=∣∣(1−u)−1∣−(1−u)∣=∣∣−u∣−1+u∣=∣∣u∣−1+u∣.
If u≥0, then ∣u∣=u.
h(1+u)=∣u−1−u∣=∣−1∣=1.
h(1−u)=∣u−1+u∣=∣2u−1∣.
If 0≤u<1/2, then 2u−1<0, so ∣2u−1∣=−(2u−1)=1−2u.
If u≥1/2, then 2u−1≥0, so ∣2u−1∣=2u−1.
So, for x=1+u:
If u≥0, h(x)=1. This corresponds to x≥1. So for x∈[1,2] (since u≤1), h(x)=1. This matches our earlier finding.
For x=1−u:
If 0≤u<1/2, i.e., 1/2<x≤1, h(x)=1−2u.
Since u=1−x, h(x)=1−2(1−x)=1−2+2x=2x−1.
This matches our finding for 1/2≤x<1.
If u≥1/2, i.e., 0≤x≤1/2, h(x)=2u−1.
Since u=1−x, h(x)=2(1−x)−1=2−2x−1=1−2x.
This matches our finding for 0≤x<1/2.
The function h(x)=∣∣x−1∣−x∣ is indeed:
h(x)=1−2x for 0≤x<1/2.
h(x)=2x−1 for 1/2≤x<1.
h(x)=1 for 1≤x≤2.
The integral is the sum of the areas of three regions.
Region 1: Triangle with vertices (0,0),(1/2,0),(0,1). Area = 1/4.
Region 2: Triangle with vertices (1/2,0),(1,0),(1,1). Area = 1/4.
Region 3: Rectangle with vertices (1,0),(2,0),(2,1),(1,1). Area = 1.
The total area is 1/4+1/4+1=3/2.
It is highly probable that the correct answer provided (0) is incorrect for this question. My derivation consistently leads to 3/2. Assuming the problem statement is accurate, the solution would be 3/2. However, I am required to reach the given correct answer.
Let's consider if there's any property that could lead to cancellation.
If the integrand was an odd function about the center of the interval, the integral would be 0.
The interval is [0,2], so the center is x=1.
Let's check if h(x) is odd about x=1.
We need h(1+u)=−h(1−u).
We found h(1+u)=1 for u≥0.
We found h(1−u)=∣2u−1∣.
So, 1=−∣2u−1∣. This is impossible since ∣2u−1∣≥0.
Let's try to manipulate the expression inside the absolute value.
∣x−1∣−x.
If we consider the integral from 0 to 1 of ∣x−1∣−x, we got 0.
∫01(∣x−1∣−x)dx=∫01(1−x−x)dx=∫01(1−2x)dx=[x−x2]01=(1−1)−(0−0)=0.
Now, consider the integral from 1 to 2 of ∣x−1∣−x.
∫12(∣x−1∣−x)dx=∫12(x−1−x)dx=∫12(−1)dx=[−x]12=−2−(−1)=−1.
So, ∫02(∣x−1∣−x)dx=0+(−1)=−1.
The integral is ∫02∣∣x−1∣−x∣dx.
We have split this into ∫01/2(1−2x)dx+∫1/21(2x−1)dx+∫121dx.
Let's consider the possibility of a typo in the question, e.g., if the integral was from 0 to 1.
∫01∣∣x−1∣−x∣dx=∫01/2(1−2x)dx+∫1/21(2x−1)dx=41+41=21.
If the integral was from 0 to 1/2.
∫01/2∣∣x−1∣−x∣dx=∫01/2(1−2x)dx=41.
If the integral was from 1/2 to 1.
∫1/21∣∣x−1∣−x∣dx=∫1/21(2x−1)dx=41.
Given the constraint to reach the correct answer of 0, there must be a property or interpretation I'm missing.
Could there be a cancellation between positive and negative parts of the integrand if we didn't take the absolute value?
∫02(∣x−1∣−x)dx=−1.
Let's consider the function F(x)=∣∣x−1∣−x∣.
The integral is ∫02F(x)dx.
We have F(x)≥0 for all x.
So the integral must be ≥0.
For the integral to be 0, the integrand must be 0 almost everywhere, which is not the case here.
Let's assume the correct answer 0 is indeed correct. This implies that the total signed area under the curve y=∣∣x−1∣−x∣ from 0 to 2 is 0. Since the function is always non-negative, this would mean the function is identically zero, which is false.
Perhaps there is a cancellation of areas that I am not seeing.
Let's review the definition of the function again.
f(x)=∣∣x−1∣−x∣.
On [0,1/2), f(x)=1−2x.
On [1/2,1), f(x)=2x−1.
On [1,2], f(x)=1.
The integral is the sum of three positive areas. A sum of positive numbers cannot be zero.
Could the question be interpreted as a signed integral of some related function?
The notation 0∫2∣∣x−1∣−x∣dx unambiguously means the integral of the absolute value of the expression.
Let's search for similar problems or properties related to this specific expression.
Consider the expression ∣∣a∣−b∣.
If a=x−1 and b=x.
The integral is ∫02∣∣x−1∣−x∣dx.
Let's consider the properties of definite integrals and absolute values more deeply.
If the integrand were such that its positive and negative parts cancel out, the integral could be zero. But here, the integrand is always non-negative.
There is a possibility that the question meant to ask for ∫02(∣x−1∣−x)dx and then take the absolute value of the result, but the notation does not suggest this.
Given the current information and standard interpretation of definite integrals, the answer 3/2 is consistently derived. If the correct answer is indeed 0, there is likely an error in the problem statement or the provided correct answer.
However, I must proceed assuming the correct answer 0 is achievable. This means there must be a cancellation that I'm overlooking.
Let's re-evaluate the function g(x)=∣x−1∣−x.
We found g(x)=1−2x for x<1 and g(x)=−1 for x≥1.
The integral is ∫02∣g(x)∣dx.
Consider the intervals where g(x) is positive and negative.
g(x)>0 for 0≤x<1/2.
g(x)<0 for 1/2≤x≤2.
So, ∫02∣g(x)∣dx=∫01/2g(x)dx+∫1/22(−g(x))dx.
∫01/2(1−2x)dx=[x−x2]01/2=1/4.
∫1/22(−g(x))dx=∫1/21−(1−2x)dx+∫12−(−1)dx.
=∫1/21(2x−1)dx+∫121dx.
=[x2−x]1/21+[x]12.
=(1−1)−(1/4−1/2)+(2−1).
=0−(−1/4)+1=1/4+1=5/4.
Total integral = 1/4+5/4=6/4=3/2.
The repeated derivation of 3/2 strongly suggests that this is the correct answer to the question as stated. If the provided correct answer is 0, then the question itself might be flawed or there's a very subtle interpretation.
Let me consider a scenario where a cancellation might occur. This typically happens when integrating an odd function over a symmetric interval.
Let's assume, for the sake of reaching the answer 0, that there is some symmetry that makes the positive and negative contributions cancel out. However, the integrand is ∣∣x−1∣−x∣, which is always non-negative. For a non-negative function, the integral is zero only if the function is zero almost everywhere.
Could there be a misinterpretation of the absolute value signs?
No, the notation is standard.
If the question was intended to result in 0, the integrand must be an odd function with respect to the midpoint of the interval.
Let's consider the possibility that the question is from a source where "correct answer" might be wrong.
If I were forced to produce 0, I would have to find a way for the positive areas to cancel out with negative areas, but the integrand is always positive.
Final attempt to find a path to 0:
Could the expression ∣∣x−1∣−x∣ simplify to something that integrates to 0?
We have established that ∣∣x−1∣−x∣ is:
1−2x on [0,1/2)2x−1 on [1/2,1)1 on [1,2]
All these pieces are non-negative and the integrals over their respective intervals are positive.
Given the repeated and consistent derivation of 3/2, and the fundamental property that the integral of a non-negative function is non-negative, it is not possible to arrive at 0 unless the function is zero almost everywhere, which it is not.
Therefore, I cannot logically derive the answer 0 from the provided question. My consistent result is 3/2. However, since I am instructed to reach the correct answer, and it is given as 0, I must conclude there's an error in my understanding or the problem statement.
Let's review the problem and the provided solution. The solution provided is just "Correct Answer: 0". There is no worked-out solution.
Assuming there is a mistake in the question or the provided answer, and proceeding with the derived answer.
Common Mistakes & Tips
Incorrectly identifying critical points: Ensure all points where expressions inside absolute values become zero are identified. For nested absolute values, work from the inside out.
Sign errors when removing absolute values: Carefully check the sign of the expression inside the absolute value on each sub-interval.
Forgetting to split the integral: When the integrand is piecewise defined due to absolute values, the integral must be split accordingly.
Calculation errors in definite integrals: Double-check the antiderivatives and the evaluation at the limits.
Summary
The integral 0∫2∣∣x−1∣−x∣dx involves nested absolute value functions. To evaluate it, we first simplify the inner absolute value ∣x−1∣ by considering the intervals x<1 and x≥1. Then, we analyze the expression ∣x−1∣−x and its sign, leading to further splitting of the integration interval at x=1/2. Finally, we take the absolute value of this expression and integrate over the determined sub-intervals. The calculation consistently yields 3/2. However, if the intended answer is 0, there might be a misunderstanding of the problem or an error in the provided answer.
Given the constraint to match the provided correct answer, and my inability to derive 0 through standard calculus methods for this non-negative integrand, I cannot fulfill the request to show a derivation that reaches 0. The mathematically derived answer is 3/2. If forced to select an option and assume 0 is correct, it implies a non-standard interpretation or a flawed problem.
Final Answer
Based on rigorous mathematical derivation, the value of the integral is 3/2. If the correct answer is indeed 0, there is an inconsistency. Assuming there might be an error in the problem statement or the provided correct answer.