Step 1: Evaluate the form of the limit.
We are asked to evaluate the limit:
L=x→0lim(2−cosxcos2x)(x2x+2)
As x→0:
The base is (2−cos0cos0)=(2−1×1)=1.
The exponent is 020+2=02, which tends to ∞.
Thus, the limit is of the indeterminate form 1∞.
Step 2: Apply the formula for the 1∞ form.
For a limit of the form 1∞, we use the formula ex→climg(x)[f(x)−1].
In our case, f(x)=2−cosxcos2x and g(x)=x2x+2.
So, the limit becomes:
L=ex→0lim(x2x+2)[(2−cosxcos2x)−1]L=ex→0lim(x2x+2)(1−cosxcos2x)
Step 3: Simplify the expression inside the exponent.
We need to evaluate the limit of the exponent:
E=x→0limx2(x+2)(1−cosxcos2x)
As x→0, the numerator tends to (0+2)(1−cos0cos0)=2(1−1)=0, and the denominator tends to 02=0. This is of the form 00, so we can apply L'Hôpital's Rule.
Step 4: Apply L'Hôpital's Rule to the exponent's limit.
Let h(x)=(x+2)(1−cosxcos2x) and k(x)=x2.
We need to find the derivatives h′(x) and k′(x).
k′(x)=2x.
For h′(x), we use the product rule: h′(x)=dxd(x+2)⋅(1−cosxcos2x)+(x+2)⋅dxd(1−cosxcos2x).
dxd(x+2)=1.
Now, let's find dxd(cosxcos2x):
Using the product rule:
dxd(cosxcos2x)=(dxdcosx)cos2x+cosx(dxdcos2x)=(−sinx)cos2x+cosx(2cos2x1⋅dxd(cos2x))=−sinxcos2x+cosx(2cos2x1⋅(−2sin2x))=−sinxcos2x−cos2xcosxsin2x
So, h′(x)=1⋅(1−cosxcos2x)+(x+2)(−sinxcos2x−cos2xcosxsin2x).
Now, we apply L'Hôpital's Rule for the limit of the exponent:
E=x→0limk′(x)h′(x)=x→0lim2x(1−cosxcos2x)+(x+2)(−sinxcos2x−cos2xcosxsin2x)
As x→0, the term (1−cosxcos2x) in the numerator goes to 1−1×1=0.
The term (x+2) goes to 2.
The term (−sinxcos2x) goes to 0×1=0.
The term (−cos2xcosxsin2x) goes to −11×0=0.
So, the numerator becomes 0+2(0−0)=0, and the denominator is 2×0=0.
We still have the 00 form. We need to apply L'Hôpital's Rule again.
Let's re-examine the exponent limit:
E=x→0limx2(x+2)(1−cosxcos2x)
We can rewrite the term (1−cosxcos2x) to make it easier to manage.
Consider x→0limx21−cosxcos2x.
This is still of the form 00. Applying L'Hôpital's Rule directly to this part:
Numerator derivative: −(−sinxcos2x)−(cosx⋅2cos2x−2sin2x)=sinxcos2x+cos2xcosxsin2x.
Denominator derivative: 2x.
So, x→0lim2xsinxcos2x+cos2xcosxsin2x.
This is still 00. Let's apply L'Hôpital's Rule again to this sub-limit.
This is becoming very complicated. Let's try a different approach for the exponent limit by using Taylor series expansions or by manipulating the expression.
Let's go back to E=x→0limx2(x+2)(1−cosxcos2x).
We know that as x→0, x+2→2. So, we can write:
E=2x→0limx21−cosxcos2x.
Let's evaluate x→0limx21−cosxcos2x.
This is of the form 00. Apply L'Hôpital's Rule:
Numerator derivative: −(−sinxcos2x+cosx2cos2x−2sin2x)=sinxcos2x+cos2xcosxsin2x.
Denominator derivative: 2x.
So, we have x→0lim2xsinxcos2x+cos2xcosxsin2x.
This is still 00. Apply L'Hôpital's Rule again.
Numerator derivative:
dxd(sinxcos2x)=cosxcos2x+sinx2cos2x−2sin2x=cosxcos2x−cos2xsinxsin2x.
dxd(cos2xcosxsin2x):
Let u=cosxsin2x and v=cos2x.
u′=−sinxsin2x+cosx(2cos2x)=−sinxsin2x+2cosxcos2x.
v′=2cos2x1(−2sin2x)=cos2x−sin2x.
dxd(vu)=v2u′v−uv′=cos2x(−sinxsin2x+2cosxcos2x)cos2x−(cosxsin2x)(cos2x−sin2x)=cos2xcos2x(−sinxsin2x+2cosxcos2x)cos2x+cosxsin22x
Let's evaluate the terms in the numerator of x→0lim2xsinxcos2x+cos2xcosxsin2x as x→0:
Term 1: sinxcos2x→0×1=0.
Term 2: cos2xcosxsin2x→11×0=0.
So, the numerator is 0+0=0. The denominator is 2x→0.
Let's use Taylor series expansions for a more straightforward calculation of the exponent:
As x→0:
cosx=1−2x2+O(x4)cos2x=1−2(2x)2+O(x4)=1−2x2+O(x4)cos2x=(1−2x2+O(x4))1/2=1+21(−2x2)+O(x4)=1−x2+O(x4)
Now, let's find the limit of the exponent:
E=x→0limx2(x+2)(1−cosxcos2x)E=x→0limx2(x+2)(23x2+O(x4))E=x→0lim(x+2)(23+O(x2))
As x→0, x+2→2, and 23+O(x2)→23.
So, E=2×23=3.
The value of the original limit is eE=e3.
The problem states that the value of the limit is ea.
Therefore, ea=e3, which implies a=3.
Let's recheck the provided correct answer which is 0. There might be a misunderstanding or error in my derivation or the question's provided answer. Let me carefully re-read the question and the provided solution.
The provided solution has:
x→0lim(2−cosxcos2x)x2x+2 form : 1 ∞=ex→0lim(x21−cosxcos2x)×(x+2)
This part is correct.
Then it says:
Now, x→0limx21−cosxcos2x=x→0lim2xsinxcos2x−cosx×2cos2x1×(−2sin2x) (by L' Hospital Rule)
This is applying L'Hopital's rule to the expression x21−cosxcos2x.
The derivative of the numerator is indeed:
−dxd(cosxcos2x)=−[(−sinx)cos2x+cosx2cos2x1(−2sin2x)]=sinxcos2x+cos2xcosxsin2x.
The derivative of the denominator is 2x.
So, the application of L'Hopital's rule in the provided solution is:
x→0lim2xsinxcos2x+2cos2xcosx(−2sin2x)=x→0lim2xsinxcos2x−cos2xcosxsin2x
The provided solution has a minus sign error in the derivative of cosxcos2x.
The term should be =cosx×2cos2x1×(−2sin2x)−cos2xcosxsin2x.
So the derivative of 1−cosxcos2x is −(−sinxcos2x−cos2xcosxsin2x)=sinxcos2x+cos2xcosxsin2x.
The provided solution has sinxcos2x−cosx×2cos2x1×(−2sin2x) in the numerator, which is sinxcos2x+cos2xcosxsin2x. This part is correct.
Let's follow the provided solution from this point:
x→0lim2xsinxcos2x+cos2xcosxsin2x
The provided solution then simplifies this to:
x→0lim2xsinxcos2x+sin2x.cosx
This simplification is incorrect. It seems they have multiplied the numerator and denominator by cos2x, but this is not how it was presented.
Let's re-evaluate x→0lim2xsinxcos2x+cos2xcosxsin2x.
We can split this into two limits:
x→0lim2xsinxcos2x+x→0lim2xcos2xcosxsin2x
First limit: x→0limxsinx⋅2cos2x=1⋅21=21.
Second limit: x→0limcos2xcosx⋅2xsin2x.
We know x→0lim2xsin2x=1.
So, the second limit is 1⋅1=1.
Adding these two limits: 21+1=23.
So, x→0limx21−cosxcos2x=23.
Then the exponent is:
E=x→0lim(x21−cosxcos2x)×(x+2)E=23×x→0lim(x+2)=23×2=3.
This leads to e3.
Let me consider the possibility that the question intended a different expression, or that the provided "Correct Answer: 0" is indeed correct and my derivation is flawed.
If a=0, then the limit should be e0=1.
For the limit to be 1, the exponent limit E must be 0.
E=x→0limx2(x+2)(1−cosxcos2x)=0.
Let's re-examine the Taylor expansion:
1−cosxcos2x=23x2+O(x4).
So, x21−cosxcos2x=23+O(x2).
Then x→0limx21−cosxcos2x=23.
Could there be a mistake in the question itself, or the provided correct answer? Given the consistent result of e3 from multiple calculation methods (Taylor expansion and careful L'Hopital's rule application), it's highly probable that a=3. However, I must adhere to the provided "Correct Answer: 0". This implies the limit should be e0=1.
Let's assume the provided answer a=0 is correct and work backwards to see if the limit can be 1.
For the limit to be 1, the exponent must tend to 0.
E=x→0limx2(x+2)(1−cosxcos2x)=0.
Since x+2→2, this implies x→0limx21−cosxcos2x=0.
This contradicts our previous findings.
Let's review the provided solution's calculation:
x→0limx21−cosxcos2x=x→0lim2xsinxcos2x−cosx×2cos2x1×(−2sin2x)
This step is correct application of L'Hopital's rule.
=x→0lim2cos2xsinxcos2x+cosxsin2x×2x1=x→0lim4xcos2xsinxcos2x+cosxsin2x
Now, apply L'Hopital's rule again to 4xcos2xsinxcos2x+cosxsin2x if it's 00.
Numerator: sinxcos2x+cosxsin2x. At x=0, this is 0×1+1×0=0.
Denominator: 4xcos2x. At x=0, this is 0×1=0.
So it is 00.
Derivative of numerator:
dxd(sinxcos2x)=cosxcos2x+sinx2cos2x−2sin2x=cosxcos2x−cos2xsinxsin2x.
dxd(cosxsin2x)=−sinxsin2x+cosx(2cos2x)=−sinxsin2x+2cosxcos2x.
Numerator derivative = cosxcos2x−cos2xsinxsin2x−sinxsin2x+2cosxcos2x.
At x=0, this is 1×1−0−0+2×1×1=1+2=3.
Derivative of denominator:
dxd(4xcos2x)=4cos2x+4x2cos2x−2sin2x=4cos2x−cos2x4xsin2x.
At x=0, this is 4×1−0=4.
So, x→0lim4xcos2xsinxcos2x+cosxsin2x=43.
This is the limit of x21−cosxcos2x if we rewrite it as x21−cosxcos2x=4xcos2xsinxcos2x+cosxsin2x. This step is incorrect.
Let's go back to the original L'Hopital's application:
x→0limx21−cosxcos2x=x→0lim2xsinxcos2x+cos2xcosxsin2x.
We evaluated this as 23.
Let's look at the provided solution's next step:
x→0lim2xsinxcos2x+sin2x.cosx=21+1=23
This step is highly suspicious. It seems they have incorrectly simplified the expression before evaluating.
The expression sinxcos2x+sin2x.cosx is sin(x+2x)=sin(3x).
So, x→0lim2xsin(3x)=x→0lim3x3sin(3x)×21=1×23=23.
This calculation is correct for the expression 2xsin(3x).
However, the previous step was x→0lim2xsinxcos2x−cosx×2cos2x1×(−2sin2x).
The numerator is sinxcos2x+cos2xcosxsin2x.
The provided solution seems to have replaced cos2x with cos2x and cos2x1 with 1, which is incorrect.
Let's assume there is a typo in the question or the provided answer. If the correct answer is indeed 0, then the exponent limit must be 0. This is not happening with the given expression.
Let's consider if the exponent was different, for example, if the exponent was such that the limit becomes 1∞ and the exponent limit is 0.
Given that the provided "Correct Answer: 0" implies a=0, and my consistent derivation yields a=3, there is a strong discrepancy. I will proceed with the derivation that leads to the provided correct answer, assuming there's a subtle point I'm missing or a standard trick that leads to 0.
If a=0, then ea=e0=1.
This means x→0limx2(x+2)(1−cosxcos2x)=0.
This would require x→0limx21−cosxcos2x=0.
Let's re-examine the provided solution's calculation of the exponent limit:
It arrives at E=23×2=3.
This leads to e3, so a=3.
There seems to be an error in the problem statement or the provided correct answer.
However, if I am forced to produce the answer 0, I would have to find a way to make the exponent limit 0.
Let's consider the possibility of a very subtle cancellation.
Consider the expression 1−cosxcos2x.
We know cosx≈1−x2/2 and cos2x≈1−2x2.
cos2x≈1−x2.
cosxcos2x≈(1−x2/2)(1−x2)≈1−x2−x2/2=1−3x2/2.
1−cosxcos2x≈3x2/2.
So, x21−cosxcos2x≈3/2.
If the question was designed to have the answer 0, it's possible there's a typo in the base or the exponent that would lead to an exponent limit of 0.
Given the constraint to reach the "Correct Answer: 0", and the provided solution's derivation leading to a=3, it's impossible to reconcile without assuming a significant error in the problem statement or the given correct answer.
However, if I must present a derivation that concludes with a=0, I would have to assume a flaw in the problem that, if corrected, would lead to a=0. Since I cannot alter the problem, I must point out the discrepancy.
Assuming there is a mistake in the provided "Correct Answer" and proceeding with the derivation that leads to a logical answer based on standard mathematical procedures:
Step 5: Calculate the final limit.
We found the limit of the exponent to be E=3.
Therefore, the value of the original limit is eE=e3.
The problem states that the value of the limit is ea.
So, ea=e3.
This implies a=3.
Step 6: Reconciling with the provided "Correct Answer: 0".
The derivation consistently leads to a=3. If the correct answer is indeed 0, then the problem statement must be different or there's an error in the provided correct answer. Without further information or clarification, it's impossible to derive a=0 from the given problem.
However, if we strictly follow the provided solution's calculation that results in a=3, and then are forced to output the given correct answer. This implies a forced conclusion.
Let's assume, hypothetically, that after the calculation of the exponent limit, there was an error in the provided solution that led to the incorrect conclusion for 'a'.
The provided solution states:
=ex→0lim(x21−cosxcos2x)×(x+2)
And then it calculates the limit of the exponent as 23×2=3.
So, the limit is e3.
Thus, a=3.
The provided solution then concludes:
⇒ a = 3
This contradicts the stated "Correct Answer: 0".
Since I must provide a solution that reaches the correct answer, and the correct answer is stated as 0, I cannot proceed with the derivation that leads to 3. This indicates a fundamental issue with the problem as presented.
If I am forced to make the answer 0, I would have to assume the exponent limit is 0.
This would mean:
x→0limx2(x+2)(1−cosxcos2x)=0.
This is not achievable with the given functions.
Given the strict instruction to reach the provided correct answer, and the provided correct answer is 0, I cannot provide a valid mathematical derivation that reaches this answer from the given problem. The problem statement and the correct answer are inconsistent.
However, if I must output something to fulfill the requirement, I would have to state that the derivation points to a=3, but if the correct answer is 0, then the problem is ill-posed or contains an error.
Let's consider the possibility that the question intended for a different limit form or a different expression.
If we ignore the provided solution's calculation and assume a=0, then the limit should be e0=1.
This means the exponent limit must be 0.
There's no evident way to make the exponent limit 0.
Given the discrepancy, and the instruction to match the correct answer, I cannot provide a valid step-by-step derivation that leads to 0. The provided solution itself leads to a=3.
Final attempt to find a path to a=0, assuming the problem is solvable with this answer.
If a=0, then x→0lim(2−cosxcos2x)(x2x+2)=1.
This means the exponent limit is 0.
x→0limx2(x+2)(1−cosxcos2x)=0.
Since x→0lim(x+2)=2=0, it must be that x→0limx21−cosxcos2x=0.
However, as shown by Taylor expansion and L'Hopital's rule, this limit is 23.
Therefore, there is an inconsistency. I will present the derivation as it should be, leading to a=3, and then acknowledge the discrepancy with the provided answer. Since I must reach the correct answer, and the correct answer is stated as 0, I am in a paradoxical situation.
Revised Step-by-Step Solution (assuming the correct answer is 0 and trying to find a flaw in the derivation or problem)
Since the provided correct answer is 0, this means a=0. The limit value is e0=1.
For the limit to be 1, the exponent's limit must be 0.
Exponent E=x→0limx2(x+2)(1−cosxcos2x).
For E=0, since x→0lim(x+2)=2, we must have x→0limx21−cosxcos2x=0.
Let's re-examine the provided solution's calculation of the exponent limit:
x→0limx21−cosxcos2x
The provided solution incorrectly simplifies the expression after L'Hopital's rule:
x→0lim2xsinxcos2x+sin2x.cosx
This simplification leads to 23.
If the limit of x21−cosxcos2x was indeed 0, then the overall exponent limit would be 0×2=0, leading to e0=1, and thus a=0.
However, the calculations rigorously show that x→0limx21−cosxcos2x=23.
Given the strict requirement to match the correct answer of 0, and the inconsistency found, I cannot provide a valid step-by-step derivation that reaches 0. The provided problem statement and its correct answer appear to be contradictory.
Final Answer based on the provided "Correct Answer: 0"
The problem statement leads to a limit of e3, implying a=3. However, the provided "Correct Answer" is 0, implying a=0. Due to this inconsistency, a valid mathematical derivation to reach the answer 0 from the given problem cannot be constructed. If the correct answer is indeed 0, there is an error in the problem statement.