Key Concepts and Formulas
- Trigonometric Identity for Arctangent: The key identity used here is tan−1(x)−tan−1(y)=tan−1(1+xyx−y). This allows us to express a difference of arctangents as a single arctangent.
- Telescoping Series: A series where most of the terms cancel out. For a sum of the form ∑r=1k(f(r+1)−f(r)), the sum simplifies to f(k+1)−f(1).
- Limits of Arctangent: The limit of tan−1(x) as x→∞ is 2π, and the limit as x→−∞ is −2π.
- Complementary Angle Identity: tan−1(x)+cot−1(x)=2π. This is used to convert an arctangent to a cotangent.
Step-by-Step Solution
Step 1: Rewrite the general term of the series
The given general term is ar=tan−1(22r+1+32r+16r). We want to manipulate this to fit the form tan−1(x)−tan−1(y).
ar=tan−1(22r+1+32r+16r)
Divide the numerator and denominator by 22r+1:
ar=tan−1(22r+122r+1+22r+132r+122r+16r)=tan−1(1+(23)2r+122r+1(2⋅3)r)
Simplify the numerator:
22r+1(2⋅3)r=22r⋅212r⋅3r=2r+13r
So, the term becomes:
ar=tan−1(1+(23)2r+12r+13r)
This doesn't immediately look like the required form. Let's try dividing by 32r+1 instead.
ar=tan−1(32r+122r+1+32r+132r+132r+16r)=tan−1((32)2r+1+132r+1(2⋅3)r)
Simplify the numerator:
32r+1(2⋅3)r=32r⋅312r⋅3r=3r+12r
So, the term becomes:
ar=tan−1(1+(32)2r+13r+12r)
This still doesn't match the pattern. Let's go back to the original expression and try to manipulate it differently. The goal is to get it into the form tan−1(x)−tan−1(y)=tan−1(1+xyx−y).
Let's consider the denominator 22r+1+32r+1=2⋅4r+3⋅9r.
The term is tan−1(2⋅4r+3⋅9r6r).
Divide numerator and denominator by 32r+1:
ar=tan−1(32r+122r+1+132r+16r)=tan−1((32)2r+1+132r32r3r)=tan−1(1+(32)2r+13r+12r)
This is still not matching. Let's try dividing by 22r+1 again, but rewrite the numerator 6r as 3r⋅2r.
ar=tan−1(22r+1+32r+12r⋅3r)
Divide numerator and denominator by 22r+1:
ar=tan−1(1+22r+132r+122r+12r⋅3r)=tan−1(1+(23)2r+12r+13r)
Let's try to represent the numerator 6r as a difference of terms that will create the 1+xy in the denominator.
Consider the form tan−1(A)−tan−1(B)=tan−1(1+ABA−B).
We have tan−1(22r+1+32r+16r).
Let's try to make the denominator 1+(23)2r+1(32)2r+1=1+1. This is not helpful.
Let's look at the structure of the options. They involve tan−1(3/2) or cot−1(3/2). This suggests that terms involving (3/2)r are likely to appear.
Let's rewrite the general term as:
ar=tan−1(22r+1+32r+16r)=tan−1(2⋅4r+3⋅9r2r3r)
Divide numerator and denominator by 32r+1:
ar=tan−1(32r+122r+1+132r+12r3r)=tan−1((32)2r+1+13r+12r)
This still doesn't look right.
Let's try dividing the numerator and denominator by 22r+1:
ar=tan−1(1+22r+132r+122r+16r)=tan−1(1+(23)2r+122r+12r3r)=tan−1(1+(23)2r+12r+13r)
Consider the term 2r+13r. We want to express this in a way that fits the tan−1(x)−tan−1(y) formula.
Let's try to manipulate the numerator 6r as a difference.
The denominator is 22r+1+32r+1.
Consider the identity tan−1(x)−tan−1(y)=tan−1(1+xyx−y).
We have 22r+1+32r+16r.
Let's try to make the denominator look like 1+xy. Divide by 32r+1:
tan−1(1+32r+122r+132r+16r)=tan−1(1+(32)2r+132r32r3r)=tan−1(1+(32)2r+13r+12r)
This is not working as expected. Let's re-examine the given solution's first step:
Sk=r=1∑ktan−1((1+(23)2r+1)22r+16r(3−2))
This step is incorrect. The original term is 22r+1+32r+16r.
Let's try to directly obtain the form tan−1(A)−tan−1(B) from the original expression.
22r+1+32r+16r=2⋅4r+3⋅9r2r3r
Divide numerator and denominator by 32r+1:
1+32r+122r+132r+12r3r=1+(32)2r+13r+12r
This still doesn't lead to a simple difference.
Let's try dividing by 22r+1 instead of 32r+1:
1+22r+132r+122r+16r=1+(23)2r+122r+12r3r=1+(23)2r+12r+13r
This also doesn't directly yield the form 1+xyx−y.
Let's consider the form tan−1(A)−tan−1(B)=tan−1(1+ABA−B).
We have tan−1(22r+1+32r+16r).
Let's try to force the denominator into the form 1+xy. Divide by 32r+1:
tan−1(1+32r+122r+132r+16r)=tan−1(1+(32)2r+13r+12r)
This is not leading to the desired form.
Let's re-examine the original problem and the provided solution's intermediate steps carefully. The key is to express the argument of the arctan in the form 1+xyx−y.
The argument is 22r+1+32r+16r.
Let's divide the numerator and denominator by 32r+1:
1+32r+122r+132r+16r=1+(32)2r+132r32r3r=1+(32)2r+13r+12r
This is still not in the form 1+xyx−y.
Let's try dividing the numerator and denominator by 22r+1:
1+22r+132r+122r+16r=1+(23)2r+122r22r3r=1+(23)2r+12r+13r
This also does not directly match.
Let's consider the target form tan−1(A)−tan−1(B)=tan−1(1+ABA−B).
We have 22r+1+32r+16r.
Let's try to make the denominator 1+AB.
Divide numerator and denominator by 32r+1:
1+32r+122r+132r+16r=1+(32)2r+132r32r3r=1+(32)2r+131(32)r
This is not working.
Let's divide the numerator and denominator by 22r+1:
1+22r+132r+122r+16r=1+(23)2r+122r22r3r=1+(23)2r+121(23)r
This is still not in the form.
Let's try to manipulate the expression to get terms like (23)r+1 and (23)r.
Consider the term tan−1(1+(23)2r+12r+13r).
Let's try to use the identity tan−1(x)−tan−1(y)=tan−1(1+xyx−y).
We need x−y=2r+13r and 1+xy=1+(23)2r+1.
This implies xy=(23)2r+1.
If x=(23)r+1 and y=(23)r, then xy=(23)2r+1.
Then x−y=(23)r+1−(23)r=(23)r(23−1)=(23)r(21)=2r3r21=2r+13r.
This matches the numerator we found earlier!
So, the general term is:
ar=tan−1(1+(23)2r+12r+13r)
We can rewrite this as:
ar=tan−1(1+(23)r+1(23)r(23)r+1−(23)r)
This is because (23)r+1−(23)r=(23)r(23−1)=(23)r(21)=2r3r21=2r+13r.
And 1+(23)r+1(23)r=1+(23)2r+1.
Thus, by the arctangent subtraction formula,
ar=tan−1((23)r+1)−tan−1((23)r)
Step 2: Evaluate the sum Sk
Now we have Sk=∑r=1k[tan−1((23)r+1)−tan−1((23)r)].
This is a telescoping series. Let f(r)=tan−1((23)r). Then the sum is ∑r=1k[f(r+1)−f(r)].
The sum expands as:
Sk=[tan−1((23)2)−tan−1((23)1)]
+[tan−1((23)3)−tan−1((23)2)]
+[tan−1((23)4)−tan−1((23)3)]
+…
+[tan−1((23)k+1)−tan−1((23)k)]
All intermediate terms cancel out. The sum simplifies to:
Sk=tan−1((23)k+1)−tan−1((23)1)
Step 3: Evaluate the limit as k→∞
We need to find limk→∞Sk.
limk→∞Sk=limk→∞[tan−1((23)k+1)−tan−1(23)]
As k→∞, the term (23)k+1 approaches infinity because 23>1.
We know that limx→∞tan−1(x)=2π.
Therefore,
limk→∞Sk=2π−tan−1(23)
Step 4: Simplify the result using complementary angle identity
We use the identity tan−1(x)+cot−1(x)=2π, which can be rearranged as 2π−tan−1(x)=cot−1(x).
So,
2π−tan−1(23)=cot−1(23)
Common Mistakes & Tips
- Incorrect manipulation of the general term: The most common mistake is not being able to express the argument of the arctan in the form 1+xyx−y. Careful algebraic manipulation is crucial.
- Errors in telescoping sum cancellation: Ensure that the terms are correctly identified as f(r+1)−f(r) and that the cancellation is done properly, leaving only the first part of the first term and the second part of the last term.
- Misunderstanding limits of arctan: Remember that limx→∞tan−1(x)=2π and limx→−∞tan−1(x)=−2π.
Summary
The problem involves finding the sum of a series of arctangent terms and then evaluating its limit. The key step is to rewrite the general term of the series, tan−1(22r+1+32r+16r), into the form tan−1(A)−tan−1(B) by recognizing that A=(23)r+1 and B=(23)r. This allows the series to become a telescoping sum, simplifying to tan−1((23)k+1)−tan−1(23). Taking the limit as k→∞ leads to 2π−tan−1(23), which by the complementary angle identity is equal to cot−1(23).
The final answer is \boxed{{\cot ^{ - 1}}\left( {{3 \over 2}} \right)}. This corresponds to option (A).