Algebraic Manipulation for Limits: Techniques like rationalization are crucial for simplifying indeterminate forms of limits, especially those involving square roots.
Standard Trigonometric Limits: The fundamental limit u→0limusinu=1 and its variations are essential for evaluating limits involving trigonometric functions.
Double Angle and Half Angle Formulas: Knowledge of formulas like sin2x=21−cos2x (or 1−cosx=2sin2(x/2)) and cosx=2cos2(x/2)−1 helps simplify trigonometric expressions.
Step-by-Step Solution
Step 1: Identify the Indeterminate Form
We are asked to evaluate the limit:
L=x→0lim2−1+cosxsin2x
As x→0, sin2x→02=0.
Also, as x→0, cosx→cos0=1. So, 1+cosx→1+1=2.
Therefore, the denominator 2−1+cosx→2−2=0.
This results in the indeterminate form 00, indicating that further manipulation is required.
Step 2: Rationalize the Denominator
To handle the square roots in the denominator, we multiply the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator, which is 2+1+cosx.
L=x→0lim(2−1+cosxsin2x)×(2+1+cosx2+1+cosx)L=x→0lim(2)2−(1+cosx)2sin2x(2+1+cosx)L=x→0lim2−(1+cosx)sin2x(2+1+cosx)L=x→0lim1−cosxsin2x(2+1+cosx)
Step 3: Apply Trigonometric Identities
We can now use the identity 1−cosx=2sin2(x/2).
L=x→0lim2sin2(2x)sin2x(2+1+cosx)
We also know that sinx=2sin(x/2)cos(x/2). Therefore, sin2x=(2sin(x/2)cos(x/2))2=4sin2(x/2)cos2(x/2).
Substitute this into the expression:
L=x→0lim2sin2(2x)4sin2(2x)cos2(2x)(2+1+cosx)
Step 4: Simplify and Use Standard Limits
Cancel out the common term 2sin2(x/2) from the numerator and denominator.
L=x→0lim2cos2(2x)(2+1+cosx)
Now, we can directly substitute x=0 since the expression is no longer indeterminate.
As x→0:
cos(x/2)→cos(0)=1. So, cos2(x/2)→12=1.
cosx→cos0=1. So, 1+cosx→1+1=2.
Substituting these values:
L=2×(1)×(2+2)L=2×(22)L=42
Wait! Reviewing the provided correct answer, it is 2. Let's re-examine the steps to find the error. The original solution provided leads to 42, which contradicts the correct answer. Let's restart from Step 3 with a different simplification approach.
Revised Step 3: Apply Trigonometric Identities (Alternative Approach)
We have:
L=x→0lim1−cosxsin2x(2+1+cosx)
We know the standard limit x→0limxsinx=1, which implies x→0limx2sin2x=1.
We also know that 1−cosx=2sin2(x/2).
Let's rewrite the expression to utilize these standard forms.
L=x→0lim(x2sin2x)×(1−cosxx2)×(2+1+cosx)
Step 4: Evaluate Each Part of the Limit
We evaluate each part separately:
x→0limx2sin2x=(x→0limxsinx)2=12=1.
x→0lim1−cosxx2. We know 1−cosx=2sin2(x/2).
So, x→0lim2sin2(x/2)x2.
We can rewrite this as x→0lim21(sin(x/2)x)2.
To use the standard limit usinu→1, let u=x/2. Then x=2u.
x→0lim21(sinu2u)2=u→0lim21(2sinuu)2=21×(2×1)2=21×4=2
x→0lim(2+1+cosx).
As x→0, cosx→1. So, 1+cosx→1+1=2.
Thus, the limit is 2+2=22.
Step 5: Combine the Results
Now, multiply the limits of the three parts:
L=(x→0limx2sin2x)×(x→0lim1−cosxx2)×(x→0lim(2+1+cosx))L=1×2×22L=42
There appears to be a persistent discrepancy with the provided "Correct Answer". Let's re-examine the problem and the provided solution's steps more carefully, assuming the provided correct answer (A) 2 is indeed correct and the initial solution was flawed.
Let's go back to:
L=x→0lim1−cosxsin2x(2+1+cosx)
We use sin2x=1−cos2x=(1−cosx)(1+cosx).
L=x→0lim1−cosx(1−cosx)(1+cosx)(2+1+cosx)
For x=0 and x close to 0, 1−cosx=0, so we can cancel the term (1−cosx).
L=x→0lim(1+cosx)(2+1+cosx)
Now, substitute x=0:
L=(1+cos0)(2+1+cos0)L=(1+1)(2+1+1)L=(2)(2+2)L=2(22)L=42
It seems the provided "Correct Answer" (A) 2 is incorrect based on standard limit evaluation techniques for the given problem. The derivation consistently leads to 42. Assuming there might be a typo in the question or the provided answer, I will proceed with the derivation that leads to 42, as it is mathematically sound.
Let's re-evaluate the provided solution's steps carefully.
Current Solution's Step 4:
x→0lim21(xsinx)2x2(sin2x2x)24x21(2+1+cosx)
This step seems to have an error in the rearrangement of terms.
Let's trace the correct path to 42 from the point after rationalization:
L=x→0lim1−cosxsin2x(2+1+cosx)
Use sin2x=1−cos2x=(1−cosx)(1+cosx).
L=x→0lim1−cosx(1−cosx)(1+cosx)(2+1+cosx)L=x→0lim(1+cosx)(2+1+cosx)
Substitute x=0:
L=(1+cos0)(2+1+cos0)L=(1+1)(2+1+1)L=(2)(2+2)L=2(22)L=42
Given the discrepancy, and the instruction to arrive at the "Correct Answer" provided, there might be a misinterpretation of the question or a typo in the question/options/answer. However, if forced to choose from the options and assuming option (A) 2 is correct, a significant error in my derivation or the problem statement must exist.
Let's try to reverse-engineer how 2 might be obtained. This would imply a cancellation or simplification that is not apparent from standard methods.
Let's assume, for the sake of reaching the given answer, that there was a mistake in the rationalization or identity application.
If the denominator was 2−2−cosx, then it would be different.
Let's reconsider the initial solution's final calculation: 21×4×22 = 42 . This confirms the initial solution's result is 42, contradicting the stated correct answer. This further reinforces the belief that the provided "Correct Answer" is incorrect for the given problem.
Assuming the question and options are correct, and the provided "Correct Answer" (A) 2 is indeed the target, there must be a subtle error in my understanding or application of limits. However, all standard methods lead to 42.
Let's proceed with the most robust derivation that yields 42, acknowledging the conflict with the stated correct answer.
Revised Step-by-Step Solution
Step 1: Identify the Indeterminate Form
We are asked to evaluate the limit:
L=x→0lim2−1+cosxsin2x
As x→0, sin2x→0 and 1+cosx→1+1=2.
This results in the indeterminate form 00.
Step 2: Rationalize the Denominator
Multiply the numerator and the denominator by the conjugate of the denominator, 2+1+cosx:
L=x→0lim2−1+cosxsin2x×2+1+cosx2+1+cosxL=x→0lim2−(1+cosx)sin2x(2+1+cosx)L=x→0lim1−cosxsin2x(2+1+cosx)
Step 3: Apply Trigonometric Identities
Use the identity sin2x=1−cos2x=(1−cosx)(1+cosx):
L=x→0lim1−cosx(1−cosx)(1+cosx)(2+1+cosx)
For x→0 and x=0, 1−cosx=0, so we can cancel the term (1−cosx):
L=x→0lim(1+cosx)(2+1+cosx)
Step 4: Evaluate the Limit by Substitution
Now, substitute x=0 into the simplified expression:
L=(1+cos0)(2+1+cos0)L=(1+1)(2+1+1)L=(2)(2+2)L=2(22)L=42
Common Mistakes & Tips
Algebraic Errors: Mistakes in rationalization or applying trigonometric identities are common. Double-check each algebraic step.
Misapplication of Standard Limits: Ensure that the form usinu is correctly manipulated. For example, x→0limx/2sin(x/2)=1, not x→0limxsin(x/2)=1/2.
Ignoring Indeterminate Forms: Do not substitute x=0 directly if the form is indeterminate. Always simplify first.
Summary
The problem involves evaluating a limit that results in the indeterminate form 00. The strategy employed is to first rationalize the denominator to remove the square roots. Subsequently, trigonometric identities are used to simplify the expression, particularly by relating sin2x to 1−cosx. After cancellation of common terms, the limit can be evaluated by direct substitution, yielding the result 42. There is a discrepancy between this derived answer and the provided correct answer, suggesting a potential error in the problem statement or the given correct option. Based on rigorous mathematical derivation, the limit evaluates to 42.
Final Answer
The derived limit is 42. However, this does not match any of the options if option (A) 2 is indeed the correct answer. If we strictly follow the provided correct answer (A), then there is an error in the problem statement or the intended solution path. Assuming the problem is stated correctly, the answer is 42. If we are forced to match option (A) 2, it implies a fundamental misunderstanding of the problem or a severe typo. Given the instruction to match the correct answer, and the persistent derivation of 42, I cannot definitively reach 2 through valid mathematical steps.
However, if we assume there was a typo in the denominator and it was meant to be 2+cosx instead of 2−1+cosx, or some other modification that leads to 2, that would require a different problem.
Given the constraints, and the fact that the provided solution in the prompt leads to 42, I must conclude that the "Correct Answer: A" is incorrect for this problem.
The final answer is 42.
If option (A) 2 must be the answer, the problem statement or the provided solution is flawed.