Skip to main content
Back to Limits, Continuity & Differentiability
JEE Main 2023
Limits, Continuity & Differentiability
Limits, Continuity and Differentiability
Hard

Question

limx23x+33x123x/231x\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 2} {{{3^x} + {3^{3 - x}} - 12} \over {{3^{ - x/2}} - {3^{1 - x}}}} is equal to_______.

Answer: 2

Solution

Key Concepts and Formulas

  • Limits: Understanding how a function behaves as its input approaches a particular value.
  • Indeterminate Forms: Recognizing forms like 00\frac{0}{0} or \frac{\infty}{\infty} which require further manipulation (e.g., L'Hôpital's Rule or algebraic simplification).
  • Algebraic Manipulation: Techniques like factorization, substitution, and simplifying fractions are crucial for resolving indeterminate forms.
  • Properties of Exponents: Familiarity with rules like am+n=amana^{m+n} = a^m \cdot a^n and an=1ana^{-n} = \frac{1}{a^n}.

Step-by-Step Solution

Step 1: Evaluate the limit by direct substitution. We are asked to find the limit: L=limx23x+33x123x/231xL = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 2} {{{3^x} + {3^{3 - x}} - 12} \over {{3^{ - x/2}} - {3^{1 - x}}}} Let's substitute x=2x=2 into the expression: Numerator: 32+33212=32+3112=9+312=03^2 + 3^{3-2} - 12 = 3^2 + 3^1 - 12 = 9 + 3 - 12 = 0 Denominator: 32/2312=3131=1313=03^{-2/2} - 3^{1-2} = 3^{-1} - 3^{-1} = \frac{1}{3} - \frac{1}{3} = 0 Since direct substitution results in the indeterminate form 00\frac{0}{0}, we need to use other methods to evaluate the limit.

Step 2: Introduce a substitution to simplify the expression. The powers of 3 in the expression are related. Let's make a substitution to simplify the terms. Notice that 3x3^x, 33x3^{3-x}, 3x/23^{-x/2}, and 31x3^{1-x} can be expressed in terms of a common base. A suitable substitution would be to let t=3x/2t = 3^{x/2}. If t=3x/2t = 3^{x/2}, then:

  • t2=(3x/2)2=3xt^2 = (3^{x/2})^2 = 3^x
  • 33x=333x=27(3x)1=27(t2)1=27t23^{3-x} = 3^3 \cdot 3^{-x} = 27 \cdot (3^x)^{-1} = 27 \cdot (t^2)^{-1} = \frac{27}{t^2}
  • 3x/2=(3x/2)1=t1=1t3^{-x/2} = (3^{x/2})^{-1} = t^{-1} = \frac{1}{t}
  • 31x=313x=3(3x)1=3(t2)1=3t23^{1-x} = 3^1 \cdot 3^{-x} = 3 \cdot (3^x)^{-1} = 3 \cdot (t^2)^{-1} = \frac{3}{t^2}

Now, let's determine the new limit as x2x \to 2. As x2x \to 2, x/21x/2 \to 1. So, t=3x/231=3t = 3^{x/2} \to 3^1 = 3. The limit becomes: L=limt3t2+27t2121t3t2L = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{t \to 3} {{{t^2} + \frac{27}{t^2} - 12} \over {\frac{1}{t} - \frac{3}{t^2}}}

Step 3: Simplify the numerator and the denominator. Let's simplify the numerator first: t2+27t212=t4+2712t2t2=t412t2+27t2{t^2} + \frac{27}{t^2} - 12 = \frac{t^4 + 27 - 12t^2}{t^2} = \frac{t^4 - 12t^2 + 27}{t^2} Now, let's factor the quadratic in t2t^2: u212u+27u^2 - 12u + 27, where u=t2u=t^2. We need two numbers that multiply to 27 and add to -12. These are -3 and -9. So, t412t2+27=(t23)(t29)t^4 - 12t^2 + 27 = (t^2 - 3)(t^2 - 9). The numerator is (t23)(t29)t2\frac{(t^2 - 3)(t^2 - 9)}{t^2}.

Now, let's simplify the denominator: 1t3t2=t3t2\frac{1}{t} - \frac{3}{t^2} = \frac{t - 3}{t^2}

Step 4: Rewrite the entire expression with simplified numerator and denominator. Substituting the simplified forms back into the limit expression: L=limt3(t23)(t29)t2t3t2L = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{t \to 3} {\frac{\frac{(t^2 - 3)(t^2 - 9)}{t^2}}{\frac{t - 3}{t^2}}} We can cancel out the t2t^2 term from the numerator and denominator (since t3t \to 3, t0t \neq 0): L=limt3(t23)(t29)t3L = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{t \to 3} {\frac{(t^2 - 3)(t^2 - 9)}{t - 3}}

Step 5: Further factorization and simplification. We can factor the term (t29)(t^2 - 9) using the difference of squares formula, a2b2=(ab)(a+b)a^2 - b^2 = (a-b)(a+b): t29=(t3)(t+3)t^2 - 9 = (t - 3)(t + 3) Substituting this back into the expression: L=limt3(t23)(t3)(t+3)t3L = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{t \to 3} {\frac{(t^2 - 3)(t - 3)(t + 3)}{t - 3}} Since t3t \to 3, t3t \neq 3, so we can cancel out the (t3)(t-3) term from the numerator and denominator: L=limt3(t23)(t+3)L = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{t \to 3} {(t^2 - 3)(t + 3)}

Step 6: Evaluate the limit by direct substitution after simplification. Now, we can substitute t=3t=3 into the simplified expression: L=(323)(3+3)L = (3^2 - 3)(3 + 3) L=(93)(6)L = (9 - 3)(6) L=(6)(6)L = (6)(6) L=36L = 36

Step 7: Re-checking the problem and the provided solution. The current solution provided in the prompt leads to 36. However, the "Correct Answer" provided for the problem is 2. This indicates a discrepancy. Let's carefully re-examine the problem statement and the calculations.

The original expression is: limx23x+33x123x/231x\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 2} {{{3^x} + {3^{3 - x}} - 12} \over {{3^{ - x/2}} - {3^{1 - x}}}}

Let's reconsider the substitution. A common mistake is in the algebraic manipulation or in the choice of substitution.

Let's try a different approach using L'Hôpital's Rule, as the form is 00\frac{0}{0}. Let f(x)=3x+33x12f(x) = 3^x + 3^{3-x} - 12 and g(x)=3x/231xg(x) = 3^{-x/2} - 3^{1-x}. Then f(x)=ddx(3x+33x12)=3xln3+33xln3(1)=ln3(3x33x)f'(x) = \frac{d}{dx}(3^x + 3^{3-x} - 12) = 3^x \ln 3 + 3^{3-x} \ln 3 \cdot (-1) = \ln 3 (3^x - 3^{3-x}). And g(x)=ddx(3x/231x)=3x/2ln3(12)31xln3(1)=ln3(123x/2+31x)g'(x) = \frac{d}{dx}(3^{-x/2} - 3^{1-x}) = 3^{-x/2} \ln 3 \cdot (-\frac{1}{2}) - 3^{1-x} \ln 3 \cdot (-1) = \ln 3 (-\frac{1}{2} 3^{-x/2} + 3^{1-x}).

Applying L'Hôpital's Rule: L=limx2f(x)g(x)=limx2ln3(3x33x)ln3(123x/2+31x)L = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 2} \frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)} = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 2} \frac{\ln 3 (3^x - 3^{3-x})}{\ln 3 (-\frac{1}{2} 3^{-x/2} + 3^{1-x})} L=limx23x33x123x/2+31xL = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 2} \frac{3^x - 3^{3-x}}{-\frac{1}{2} 3^{-x/2} + 3^{1-x}} Now, substitute x=2x=2: Numerator: 32332=931=93=63^2 - 3^{3-2} = 9 - 3^1 = 9 - 3 = 6. Denominator: 1232/2+312=1231+31=1213+13=16+13=1+26=16-\frac{1}{2} 3^{-2/2} + 3^{1-2} = -\frac{1}{2} 3^{-1} + 3^{-1} = -\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{3} = -\frac{1}{6} + \frac{1}{3} = \frac{-1+2}{6} = \frac{1}{6}.

So, the limit is 61/6=6×6=36\frac{6}{1/6} = 6 \times 6 = 36.

It appears there might be an error in the provided "Correct Answer". Based on standard limit evaluation techniques, the answer is 36.

Let's re-examine the original solution provided in the prompt. limx23x+33x123x/231x\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 2} {{{3^x} + {3^{3 - x}} - 12} \over {{3^{ - x/2}} - {3^{1 - x}}}} let 3 x/2 = t = limt3t2+27t2121t3t2\mathop {\lim }\limits_{t \to 3} {{{t^2} + {{27} \over {{t^2}}} - 12} \over {{1 \over t} - {3 \over {{t^2}}}}} This part is correct. = limt3(t29)(t23)t3\mathop {\lim }\limits_{t \to 3} {{\left( {{t^2} - 9} \right)\left( {{t^2} - 3} \right)} \over {t - 3}} This step is incorrect. The numerator simplification was: Numerator: t2+27t212=t412t2+27t2=(t23)(t29)t2t^2 + \frac{27}{t^2} - 12 = \frac{t^4 - 12t^2 + 27}{t^2} = \frac{(t^2 - 3)(t^2 - 9)}{t^2}. Denominator: 1t3t2=t3t2\frac{1}{t} - \frac{3}{t^2} = \frac{t-3}{t^2}. So the fraction is (t23)(t29)t2×t2t3=(t23)(t29)t3\frac{(t^2 - 3)(t^2 - 9)}{t^2} \times \frac{t^2}{t-3} = \frac{(t^2 - 3)(t^2 - 9)}{t-3}. This part is correct.

= limt3(t+3)(t23)\mathop {\lim }\limits_{t \to 3} \left( {t + 3} \right)\left( {{t^2} - 3} \right) This step seems to have a miscalculation. From (t23)(t29)t3\frac{(t^2 - 3)(t^2 - 9)}{t - 3}, we factor t29=(t3)(t+3)t^2 - 9 = (t-3)(t+3). So, (t23)(t3)(t+3)t3\frac{(t^2 - 3)(t-3)(t+3)}{t-3}. Cancelling (t3)(t-3), we get (t23)(t+3)(t^2 - 3)(t+3). This is what was obtained in Step 5 of my solution.

= 6 ×\times 6 = 36 This step evaluates (323)(3+3)=(93)(6)=6×6=36(3^2 - 3)(3+3) = (9-3)(6) = 6 \times 6 = 36.

The provided solution correctly arrives at 36, but the problem states the correct answer is 2. This implies there might be a typo in the question or the provided correct answer. Assuming the question is as stated and the provided correct answer is indeed 2, there must be a subtle interpretation or manipulation missed.

Let's assume there is a typo in the question and try to reverse-engineer how the answer could be 2.

If the question was different, for instance, if the denominator was something that would lead to a different result.

Let's strictly follow the instruction to derive the given correct answer. This means we must find a way to get 2. Given that both L'Hopital's rule and algebraic substitution consistently yield 36, it's highly probable the provided "Correct Answer" is erroneous. However, as per instructions, I must work towards the given answer. This is a challenging constraint when the mathematical derivation strongly contradicts it.

Let me assume there is a mistake in my understanding of the question or a very non-standard interpretation.

Let's re-examine the substitution: t=3x/2t = 3^{x/2}. Numerator: 3x+33x12=t2+27/t2123^x + 3^{3-x} - 12 = t^2 + 27/t^2 - 12. Denominator: 3x/231x=1/t3/t23^{-x/2} - 3^{1-x} = 1/t - 3/t^2.

Let's retry the algebraic simplification very carefully. Numerator: t412t2+27t2=(t23)(t29)t2\frac{t^4 - 12t^2 + 27}{t^2} = \frac{(t^2-3)(t^2-9)}{t^2}. Denominator: t3t2\frac{t-3}{t^2}. Ratio: (t23)(t29)t3\frac{(t^2-3)(t^2-9)}{t-3}. Factor t29=(t3)(t+3)t^2-9 = (t-3)(t+3). Ratio: (t23)(t3)(t+3)t3=(t23)(t+3)\frac{(t^2-3)(t-3)(t+3)}{t-3} = (t^2-3)(t+3). As t3t \to 3, this is (323)(3+3)=(93)(6)=6×6=36(3^2-3)(3+3) = (9-3)(6) = 6 \times 6 = 36.

There is no apparent path to the answer 2 from the given problem statement using standard calculus and algebraic techniques. It is possible that the question intended a different base or a different form of the terms.

Given the strict instruction to reach the "Correct Answer" of 2, and the consistent derivation of 36, I cannot fulfill the request without making arbitrary, mathematically unfounded changes to the problem or the solution process. This scenario highlights a conflict between the provided "Correct Answer" and the actual mathematical outcome.

However, if I were forced to produce an answer of 2, it would require a fundamental alteration of the problem or a severe misapplication of rules. Since I must provide a step-by-step derivation, and the derivation leads to 36, I cannot honestly present a derivation that leads to 2.

Let's assume there's a typo in the question and the denominator was meant to yield a factor that cancels out differently.

If the question intended to have the answer 2, there might be a misprint. For instance, if the numerator was (3x3)(33x3)(3^x - 3)(3^{3-x} - 3) or something similar.

Since I am bound by the provided "Correct Answer" and must show a derivation, and my derivation leads to 36, I cannot proceed to show a derivation for 2 without fabricating steps. This is a critical constraint.

Let's assume, hypothetically, that the denominator, after some manipulation, resulted in a form where the limit evaluated to 2.

Given the impossibility of reaching the provided answer of 2 through correct mathematical steps for the given problem, I must conclude that there is an error in the problem statement or the provided correct answer.

However, if I MUST provide a derivation that leads to 2, it would be a fabricated one, which goes against the principles of a clear and educational solution.

Let's assume there's a typo in the question, and the denominator should lead to a result that makes the limit 2. This is not a derivation but an assumption to fit the answer.

The only way to get 2 from a limit problem of this form is if the simplified expression after cancellation evaluated to 2.

Let's re-examine the provided incorrect solution's step: = limt3(t29)(t23)t3\mathop {\lim }\limits_{t \to 3} {{\left( {{t^2} - 9} \right)\left( {{t^2} - 3} \right)} \over {t - 3}} This part is correct. = limt3(t+3)(t23)\mathop {\lim }\limits_{t \to 3} \left( {t + 3} \right)\left( {{t^2} - 3} \right) This is where the cancellation of (t3)(t-3) happens. The result is (3+3)(323)=6×6=36(3+3)(3^2-3) = 6 \times 6 = 36.

If the answer is 2, then perhaps the expression was supposed to simplify to something like t1t-1 or similar.

Let's consider the possibility of a typo in the question itself. If the question was: limx23x+33x123x/232x\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 2} {{{3^x} + {3^{3 - x}} - 12} \over {{3^{ - x/2}} - {3^{2 - x}}}} Denominator: 3x/232x3^{-x/2} - 3^{2-x}. As x2x \to 2, 3130=1/31=2/33^{-1} - 3^0 = 1/3 - 1 = -2/3. This does not result in 0/0.

If the problem is exactly as stated, the answer is 36. Since I am instructed to reach the answer 2, I cannot provide a valid mathematical derivation.

Assuming there is a typo in the question and the intended answer is indeed 2, I cannot provide a derivation without knowing the correct question.

However, if I am forced to present a derivation that ends in 2, it would be a fabricated one.

Let's assume the question was intended to be: limx23x63x/23\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 2} {{{3^x} - 6} \over {{3^{x/2}} - 3}} This is of the form 326313=9633=30\frac{3^2 - 6}{3^1 - 3} = \frac{9-6}{3-3} = \frac{3}{0}, which is not a 0/0 form.

Let's try to make the numerator and denominator evaluate to 0 at x=2. Numerator: 3x+33x123^x + 3^{3-x} - 12. At x=2x=2, 9+312=09+3-12=0. Denominator: 3x/231x3^{-x/2} - 3^{1-x}. At x=2x=2, 3131=03^{-1}-3^{-1}=0.

Let's assume there is a typo in the denominator such that the limit becomes 2. If the denominator was 3x/233^{x/2} - 3, then as x2x \to 2, the denominator is 313=03^1 - 3 = 0. The numerator is 3x+33x123^x + 3^{3-x} - 12. As x2x \to 2, 32+3112=9+312=03^2 + 3^1 - 12 = 9+3-12 = 0. So, let's consider the limit: limx23x+33x123x/23\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 2} \frac{3^x + 3^{3-x} - 12}{3^{x/2} - 3} Let t=3x/2t = 3^{x/2}. As x2x \to 2, t3t \to 3. 3x=t23^x = t^2. 33x=27/t23^{3-x} = 27/t^2. limt3t2+27/t212t3=limt3(t412t2+27)/t2t3=limt3(t23)(t29)t2(t3)\mathop {\lim }\limits_{t \to 3} \frac{t^2 + 27/t^2 - 12}{t - 3} = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{t \to 3} \frac{(t^4 - 12t^2 + 27)/t^2}{t - 3} = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{t \to 3} \frac{(t^2-3)(t^2-9)}{t^2(t-3)} =limt3(t23)(t3)(t+3)t2(t3)=limt3(t23)(t+3)t2= \mathop {\lim }\limits_{t \to 3} \frac{(t^2-3)(t-3)(t+3)}{t^2(t-3)} = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{t \to 3} \frac{(t^2-3)(t+3)}{t^2} =(323)(3+3)32=(93)(6)9=6×69=369=4= \frac{(3^2-3)(3+3)}{3^2} = \frac{(9-3)(6)}{9} = \frac{6 \times 6}{9} = \frac{36}{9} = 4 This still does not give 2.

Given the strong contradiction between the derived answer (36) and the provided correct answer (2), it is not possible to provide a valid, step-by-step derivation that reaches 2. The problem statement or the provided answer is likely incorrect. I will proceed with the derived answer of 36, acknowledging the discrepancy.

Summary

The problem asks for the limit of a function as xx approaches 2. Direct substitution of x=2x=2 into the expression results in the indeterminate form 00\frac{0}{0}. We employ a substitution t=3x/2t = 3^{x/2} to simplify the expression. After performing the substitution and simplifying the numerator and denominator algebraically, we obtain the expression (t23)(t29)t3\frac{(t^2 - 3)(t^2 - 9)}{t - 3}. Further factorization of the term t29t^2 - 9 as (t3)(t+3)(t-3)(t+3) allows for cancellation of the (t3)(t-3) term, leading to the simplified expression (t23)(t+3)(t^2 - 3)(t + 3). Evaluating this simplified expression as tt approaches 3 yields (323)(3+3)=(93)(6)=6×6=36(3^2 - 3)(3 + 3) = (9 - 3)(6) = 6 \times 6 = 36. This result is also confirmed using L'Hôpital's Rule. There appears to be a discrepancy with the provided correct answer of 2.

Final Answer

Based on standard mathematical derivations, the limit evaluates to 36. There is a discrepancy with the provided correct answer of 2. Assuming the question is stated correctly, the answer is 36.

The final answer is 36\boxed{36}.

Practice More Limits, Continuity & Differentiability Questions

View All Questions