Let [t] be the greatest integer less than or equal to t. Then the least value of p ∈ N for which x→0+lim(x([x1]+[x2]+…+[xp])−x2([x21]+[x222]+…+[x292])≥1 is equal to _______.
Answer: 0
Solution
Key Concepts and Formulas
Greatest Integer Function: The greatest integer function [t] gives the largest integer less than or equal to t. For large positive values of t, [t]≈t.
Limit of a Function: The limit of a function f(x) as x approaches a certain value a, denoted by limx→af(x), describes the behavior of the function near a. For x→0+, we consider values of x that are positive and very close to 0.
Summation Formulas:
Sum of the first p natural numbers: ∑k=1pk=2p(p+1).
Sum of the squares of the first n natural numbers: ∑k=1nk2=6n(n+1)(2n+1).
Step-by-Step Solution
Step 1: Analyze the Limit Expression
We are asked to find the least natural number p for which the following inequality holds:
limx→0+(x([x1]+[x2]+…+[xp])−x2([x212]+[x222]+…+[x292]))≥1
Let's consider the behavior of the terms inside the limit as x→0+.
Step 2: Approximate the Greatest Integer Function
As x→0+, the values of xn and x2n2 for n∈N become very large and positive. For large positive numbers y, the greatest integer function [y] is very close to y. Specifically, we know that y−1<[y]≤y.
So, we can approximate:
[xn]≈xn for x→0+.
[x2n2]≈x2n2 for x→0+.
Step 3: Simplify the Limit Expression using Approximations
Substitute these approximations into the expression inside the limit:
x([x1]+[x2]+…+[xp])≈x(x1+x2+…+xp)=x⋅x1(1+2+…+p)=1+2+…+p
And for the second part:
x2([x212]+[x222]+…+[x292])≈x2(x212+x222+…+x292)=x2⋅x21(12+22+…+92)=12+22+…+92
Therefore, the limit of the entire expression can be approximated as:
limx→0+(expression)≈(1+2+…+p)−(12+22+…+92)
Step 4: Apply the Inequality to the Approximated Limit
The given inequality is:
limx→0+(expression)≥1
Using our approximation, this becomes:
(1+2+…+p)−(12+22+…+92)≥1
Step 5: Calculate the Sums
Now, we use the summation formulas:
The sum of the first p natural numbers is ∑k=1pk=2p(p+1).
The sum of the squares of the first 9 natural numbers is ∑k=19k2=69(9+1)(2⋅9+1)=69⋅10⋅19.
Calculate the sum of squares:
69⋅10⋅19=2⋅33⋅3⋅2⋅5⋅19=3⋅5⋅19=15⋅1915⋅19=15⋅(20−1)=300−15=285
So, 12+22+…+92=285.
Step 6: Formulate and Solve the Inequality for p
Substitute the calculated sums back into the inequality:
2p(p+1)−285≥12p(p+1)≥286p(p+1)≥286⋅2p(p+1)≥572
Step 7: Find the Least Natural Number p
We need to find the smallest natural number p such that the product of p and (p+1) is greater than or equal to 572. We can test values or estimate.
We know that p2<p(p+1). So, p2 should be roughly less than 572.
572≈576=24.
Let's test p=23: 23⋅24=552, which is less than 572.
Let's test p=24: 24⋅25=600, which is greater than or equal to 572.
Therefore, the least natural number p satisfying the inequality is 24.
Step 8: Rigorous Justification of the Limit Approximation
While the approximation [y]≈y is generally good for large y, we need to be sure the limit is precisely (1+…+p)−(12+…+92).
We know that y−1<[y]≤y.
Let S1=∑k=1p[xk] and S2=∑k=19[x2k2].
The expression inside the limit is xS1−x2S2.
For the first part:
∑k=1p(xk−1)<xS1≤∑k=1pxkx1∑k=1pk−p<xS1≤x1∑k=1pk2xp(p+1)−p<xS1≤2xp(p+1)
Multiplying by x:
2p(p+1)−px<xS1≤2p(p+1)
As x→0+, px→0, so limx→0+xS1=2p(p+1).
For the second part:
∑k=19(x2k2−1)<x2S2≤∑k=19x2k2x21∑k=19k2−9<x2S2≤x21∑k=19k2
Let C=∑k=19k2=285.
x2C−9<x2S2≤x2C
Multiplying by x2:
C−9x2<x2S2≤C
As x→0+, 9x2→0, so limx→0+x2S2=C=285.
Therefore, the limit is exactly:
limx→0+(xS1−x2S2)=limx→0+xS1−limx→0+x2S2=2p(p+1)−285.
The inequality is 2p(p+1)−285≥1, which leads to p(p+1)≥572.
The least natural number p is 24.
Common Mistakes & Tips
Approximation Error: While [y]≈y is a good heuristic, for limits, it's crucial to confirm that the lower-order terms (like −px and −9x2) vanish as x→0. In this case, they do.
Calculation of Sums: Double-check the summation formulas and the arithmetic involved in calculating the sum of squares. A small error here can lead to the wrong final answer for p.
Finding the Least Natural Number: When solving an inequality like p(p+1)≥K, ensure you are looking for the least natural number. Testing values around K is an efficient method.
Summary
The problem requires evaluating a limit involving the greatest integer function. By approximating [y]≈y for large positive y, we simplify the limit to a difference of sums. We then use the standard formulas for the sum of the first p natural numbers and the sum of the squares of the first 9 natural numbers. This yields an inequality in terms of p. Solving this inequality, p(p+1)≥572, for the least natural number p gives us the answer.