Key Concepts and Formulas
- Implication: p⇒q≡∼p∨q
- De Morgan's Laws: ∼(p∧q)≡∼p∨∼q and ∼(p∨q)≡∼p∧∼q
- Distributive Laws: p∨(q∧r)≡(p∨q)∧(p∨r) and p∧(q∨r)≡(p∧q)∨(p∧r)
- Associative Laws: (p∨q)∨r≡p∨(q∨r) and (p∧q)∧r≡p∧(q∧r)
Step-by-Step Solution
Let's analyze each option and transform it to see if it's equivalent to (p⇒q)∨(p⇒r), which is equivalent to (∼p∨q)∨(∼p∨r)≡∼p∨q∨∼p∨r≡∼p∨q∨r≡p⇒(q∨r).
Step 1: Analyze Option (A): (p∧(∼r))⇒q
We start by converting the implication to its equivalent form using the formula p⇒q≡∼p∨q.
(p∧(∼r))⇒q≡∼(p∧∼r)∨q
Step 2: Apply De Morgan's Law
Apply De Morgan's Law to simplify ∼(p∧∼r).
∼(p∧∼r)∨q≡(∼p∨∼(∼r))∨q≡(∼p∨r)∨q
Step 3: Apply Associative Law
Use the associative law to rearrange the terms.
(∼p∨r)∨q≡∼p∨(r∨q)≡∼p∨(q∨r)
Step 4: Convert back to Implication
Convert the expression back to implication form.
∼p∨(q∨r)≡p⇒(q∨r)
Step 5: Compare with the original statement
We know that p⇒(q∨r)≡(∼p∨q)∨(∼p∨r)≡(p⇒q)∨(p⇒r). Therefore, option (A) is equivalent to the original statement.
Step 6: Analyze Option (B): (∼q)⇒((∼r)∨p)
Convert the implication to its equivalent form.
(∼q)⇒(∼r∨p)≡∼(∼q)∨(∼r∨p)≡q∨∼r∨p≡∼r∨(p∨q)
Step 7: Re-arrange the terms
∼r∨(p∨q)≡p∨(q∨∼r)≡∼p⇒(q∨∼r)
The expression is NOT equivalent to p⇒(q∨r).
Let's manipulate the original expression.
(∼q)⇒((∼r)∨p)≡(∼q)⇒(p∨(∼r))≡q∨(p∨(∼r))≡p∨q∨(∼r)≡∼p⇒(q∨∼r)
Now we want to show that it is NOT equivalent to p⇒(q∨r)≡∼p∨q∨r.
For the two to be equivalent, we need:
p∨q∨(∼r)≡∼p∨q∨r
p∨(∼r)≡∼p∨r
However, option B is equivalent to option C.
Step 8: Analyze Option (C): p⇒(q∨r)
Convert the implication to its equivalent form.
p⇒(q∨r)≡∼p∨(q∨r)
Step 9: Apply Associative Law
Apply the associative law.
∼p∨(q∨r)≡(∼p∨q)∨r≡(∼p∨q)∨(∼p∨r)≡(p⇒q)∨(p⇒r)
Therefore, option (C) is equivalent to the original statement.
Step 10: Analyze Option (D): (p∧(∼q))⇒r
Convert the implication to its equivalent form.
(p∧(∼q))⇒r≡∼(p∧∼q)∨r
Step 11: Apply De Morgan's Law
Apply De Morgan's Law to simplify ∼(p∧∼q).
∼(p∧∼q)∨r≡(∼p∨∼(∼q))∨r≡(∼p∨q)∨r
Step 12: Apply Associative Law
Use the associative law to rearrange the terms.
(∼p∨q)∨r≡∼p∨(q∨r)
Step 13: Convert back to Implication
Convert the expression back to implication form.
∼p∨(q∨r)≡p⇒(q∨r)
Step 14: Compare with the original statement
We know that p⇒(q∨r)≡(∼p∨q)∨(∼p∨r)≡(p⇒q)∨(p⇒r). Therefore, option (D) is equivalent to the original statement.
Step 15: Revisit Option (B)
We made an error in Step 7. Let's re-evaluate Option (B): (∼q)⇒((∼r)∨p).
(∼q)⇒((∼r)∨p)≡q∨(∼r∨p)≡q∨∼r∨p≡p∨q∨∼r.
The original statement is p⇒(q∨r)≡∼p∨q∨r.
Thus, we want to see if p∨q∨∼r≡∼p∨q∨r.
This is not always the case.
Let p=F,q=F,r=F. Then F∨F∨T≡T and T∨F∨F≡T.
Let p=T,q=F,r=F. Then T∨F∨T≡T and F∨F∨F≡F.
So Option B is NOT equivalent.
Common Mistakes & Tips
- Be careful when applying De Morgan's Laws; double negations are a frequent source of errors.
- Remember the equivalence between implication and disjunction: p⇒q≡∼p∨q.
- When comparing logical statements, try to reduce them to their simplest forms.
Summary
We analyzed each option and transformed them to see if they are equivalent to the original statement (p⇒q)∨(p⇒r). Options (A), (C), and (D) were found to be equivalent, while Option (B) is not.
Final Answer
The final answer is \boxed{B}, which corresponds to option (B).