Key Concepts and Formulas
- De Morgan's Laws:
- ∼(p∨q)≡(∼p)∧(∼q)
- ∼(p∧q)≡(∼p)∨(∼q)
- Distributive Laws:
- p∧(q∨r)≡(p∧q)∨(p∧r)
- p∨(q∧r)≡(p∨q)∧(p∨r)
- Negation of Negation: ∼(∼p)≡p
- Commutative Laws:
- p∨q≡q∨p
- p∧q≡q∧p
- Associative Laws:
- (p∨q)∨r≡p∨(q∨r)
- (p∧q)∧r≡p∧(q∧r)
- Identity Laws:
- p∨F≡p
- p∧T≡p
- Inverse Laws:
- p∨(∼p)≡T
- p∧(∼p)≡F
- Absorption Laws:
- p∨(p∧q)≡p
- p∧(p∨q)≡p
- Conditional and Biconditional Statements: These are not strictly necessary for this question, but are good to know.
Step-by-Step Solution
Step 1: Apply De Morgan's Law to the outermost negation.
We have the statement ∼[p∨(∼(p∧q))]. Applying De Morgan's Law, we distribute the negation and change the ∨ to ∧:
∼[p∨(∼(p∧q))]≡(∼p)∧∼(∼(p∧q))
Step 2: Simplify the double negation.
We have ∼(∼(p∧q)), which simplifies to (p∧q).
(∼p)∧∼(∼(p∧q))≡(∼p)∧(p∧q)
Step 3: Apply the associative law of conjunction.
We can regroup the terms using the associative law:
(∼p)∧(p∧q)≡(∼p∧p)∧q
Step 4: Apply the inverse law.
We know that p∧(∼p)≡F.
(∼p∧p)∧q≡F∧q
Step 5: Apply the identity law.
We know that F∧q≡F.
F∧q≡F
Step 6: Analyze the options to find an equivalent expression.
We need to find an option that is always false.
Option (A): (∼(p∧q))∧q
(∼(p∧q))∧q≡((∼p)∨(∼q))∧q≡((∼p)∧q)∨((∼q)∧q)≡((∼p)∧q)∨F≡(∼p)∧q
This is not always false.
Option (B): ∼(p∨q)≡(∼p)∧(∼q). This is not always false.
Option (C): (p∧q)∧(∼p)≡(p∧(∼p))∧q≡F∧q≡F. This is always false.
Option (D): ∼(p∧q)≡(∼p)∨(∼q). This is not always false.
Since our simplified expression is F, option (C) is equivalent.
However, the correct answer is stated to be option (A). Let's re-examine the initial problem and the target.
We simplified the original expression to (∼p)∧(p∧q). We want to show this is equivalent to (∼(p∧q))∧q.
(∼(p∧q))∧q≡((∼p)∨(∼q))∧q≡((∼p)∧q)∨((∼q)∧q)≡((∼p)∧q)∨F≡(∼p)∧q.
Now, let's see if (∼p)∧(p∧q)≡(∼p)∧q.
(∼p)∧(p∧q)≡((∼p)∧p)∧q≡F∧q≡F.
(∼p)∧q is not always F.
Let's analyze option (A) again: (∼(p∧q))∧q.
(∼(p∧q))∧q≡((∼p)∨(∼q))∧q≡((∼p)∧q)∨((∼q)∧q)≡((∼p)∧q)∨F≡(∼p)∧q.
The original expression simplifies to F. We need to show (∼(p∧q))∧q is also F.
(∼(p∧q))∧q≡(∼p∨∼q)∧q≡(∼p∧q)∨(∼q∧q)≡(∼p∧q)∨F≡∼p∧q.
This is equal to T when p is F and q is T. So, option A is NOT correct.
There seems to be an error in the given answer. The original expression reduces to F, which is equivalent to option (C).
Common Mistakes & Tips
- Be careful when applying De Morgan's Laws. Remember to negate each term and change the connective.
- Always double-check your simplifications to avoid errors.
- When using truth tables, ensure you consider all possible combinations of truth values for the variables.
Summary
We started with the given expression ∼[p∨(∼(p∧q))] and simplified it using De Morgan's Laws, the associative law, and inverse law to obtain F. Comparing this result with the options, we found that option (C), (p∧q)∧(∼p), also simplifies to F. Therefore, the given answer of option (A) is incorrect, and the correct answer should be option (C).
Final Answer
The final answer is \boxed{(p \wedge q) \wedge(\sim p)}, which corresponds to option (C).