Key Concepts and Formulas
- Implication: A→B≡∼A∨B
- Tautology: A statement that is always true, regardless of the truth values of its components.
- De Morgan's Laws: ∼(A∧B)≡∼A∨∼B and ∼(A∨B)≡∼A∧∼B
- Commutative Laws: A∧B≡B∧A and A∨B≡B∨A
- Associative Laws: (A∧B)∧C≡A∧(B∧C) and (A∨B)∨C≡A∨(B∨C)
- Distributive Laws: A∧(B∨C)≡(A∧B)∨(A∧C) and A∨(B∧C)≡(A∨B)∧(A∨C)
- Identity Laws: A∧T≡A and A∨F≡A where T is always True and F is always False.
- Complement Laws: A∧∼A≡F and A∨∼A≡T
- Absorption Laws: A∧(A∨B)≡A and A∨(A∧B)≡A
Step-by-Step Solution
Step 1: Analyze option (A): B→[A∧(A→B)]
We need to check if B→[A∧(A→B)] is a tautology. Let's rewrite the implication:
B→[A∧(∼A∨B)]≡∼B∨[A∧(∼A∨B)]
Applying the distributive law:
∼B∨[(A∧∼A)∨(A∧B)]≡∼B∨[F∨(A∧B)]≡∼B∨(A∧B)
≡(∼B∨A)∧(∼B∨B)≡(∼B∨A)∧T≡∼B∨A
This is not a tautology. The truth value depends on A and B.
Step 2: Analyze option (B): [A∧(A→B)]→B
We need to check if [A∧(A→B)]→B is a tautology. Let's rewrite the implication:
[A∧(A→B)]→B≡[A∧(∼A∨B)]→B
Using the implication rule again:
∼[A∧(∼A∨B)]∨B≡∼A∨∼(∼A∨B)∨B
Applying De Morgan's Law:
∼A∨(A∧∼B)∨B≡(∼A∨A)∧(∼A∨∼B)∨B≡T∧(∼A∨∼B)∨B
≡(∼A∨∼B)∨B≡∼A∨(∼B∨B)≡∼A∨T≡T
Therefore, [A∧(A→B)]→B is a tautology.
Step 3: Analyze option (C): [A∧(A∨B)]
Using the absorption law: A∧(A∨B)≡A. This is just A, which is not a tautology.
Step 4: Analyze option (D): [A∨(A∧B)]
Using the absorption law: A∨(A∧B)≡A. This is just A, which is not a tautology.
Common Mistakes & Tips
- Be careful with the order of operations when applying logical equivalences.
- Remember the truth tables for basic logical connectives like AND, OR, NOT, and implication.
- Use the absorption laws to simplify expressions quickly.
Summary
By analyzing each option and simplifying the logical expressions using equivalences, we found that the statement [A∧(A→B)]→B is a tautology, as it simplifies to T.
Final Answer
The final answer is \boxed{B}, which corresponds to option (B).