Skip to main content
Back to Matrices & Determinants
JEE Main 2021
Matrices & Determinants
Matrices and Determinants
Easy

Question

Let I be an identity matrix of order 2 ×\times 2 and P = \left[ {\matrix{ 2 & { - 1} \cr 5 & { - 3} \cr } } \right]. Then the value of n\inN for which P n = 5I - 8P is equal to ____________.

Answer: 2

Solution

Key Concept: The Cayley-Hamilton Theorem

The Cayley-Hamilton Theorem states that every square matrix satisfies its own characteristic equation. For a square matrix AA of order n×nn \times n, its characteristic equation is given by det(AλI)=0\det(A - \lambda I) = 0, where II is the identity matrix of the same order and λ\lambda is a scalar variable. If the characteristic equation is λn+cn1λn1++c1λ+c0=0\lambda^n + c_{n-1}\lambda^{n-1} + \dots + c_1\lambda + c_0 = 0, then according to the theorem, the matrix AA satisfies An+cn1An1++c1A+c0I=OA^n + c_{n-1}A^{n-1} + \dots + c_1A + c_0I = O, where OO is the null matrix of order n×nn \times n. This theorem is incredibly useful for expressing higher powers of a matrix in terms of lower powers and the identity matrix, significantly simplifying calculations.


Step-by-Step Solution

Step 1: Determine the Characteristic Equation of Matrix P

First, we need to find the characteristic equation of the given matrix PP. The matrix is P=[2153]P = \left[ {\begin{matrix} 2 & { - 1} \\ 5 & { - 3} \\ \end{matrix} } \right]. The characteristic equation is given by det(PλI)=0\det(P - \lambda I) = 0, where II is the 2×22 \times 2 identity matrix [1001]\left[ {\begin{matrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{matrix} } \right].

PλI=[2153]λ[1001]=[2λ153λ]P - \lambda I = \left[ {\begin{matrix} 2 & { - 1} \\ 5 & { - 3} \\ \end{matrix} } \right] - \lambda \left[ {\begin{matrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{matrix} } \right] = \left[ {\begin{matrix} 2 - \lambda & { - 1} \\ 5 & { - 3 - \lambda} \\ \end{matrix} } \right]

Now, we calculate the determinant: det(PλI)=(2λ)(3λ)(1)(5)=0\det(P - \lambda I) = (2 - \lambda)(-3 - \lambda) - (-1)(5) = 0 Expand the terms: (2)(3)+(2)(λ)+(λ)(3)+(λ)(λ)+5=0(2)(-3) + (2)(-\lambda) + (-\lambda)(-3) + (-\lambda)(-\lambda) + 5 = 0 62λ+3λ+λ2+5=0-6 - 2\lambda + 3\lambda + \lambda^2 + 5 = 0 Combine like terms: λ2+λ1=0\lambda^2 + \lambda - 1 = 0 This is the characteristic equation of matrix PP.

Step 2: Apply the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem to Express P2P^2

According to the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem, the matrix PP must satisfy its own characteristic equation. This means we can substitute PP for λ\lambda and II for the constant term (multiplied by the identity matrix, as c0c_0 in the general form c0Ic_0 I) in the characteristic equation.

So, from λ2+λ1=0\lambda^2 + \lambda - 1 = 0, we get: P2+PI=OP^2 + P - I = O Here, OO represents the 2×22 \times 2 null matrix. This equation is fundamental as it allows us to express P2P^2 in terms of PP and II. Rearranging the equation to isolate P2P^2: P2=IPP^2 = I - P This relation is crucial for simplifying higher powers of PP.

Step 3: Calculate Higher Powers of P in terms of P and I

Our goal is to find nn such that Pn=5I8PP^n = 5I - 8P. We will systematically calculate powers of PP using the relation P2=IPP^2 = I - P.

  • Calculate P3P^3 (optional, but good for understanding the pattern): P3=PP2=P(IP)P^3 = P \cdot P^2 = P(I - P) P3=PIP2P^3 = PI - P^2 Since PI=PPI = P and substituting P2=IPP^2 = I - P: P3=P(IP)P^3 = P - (I - P) P3=PI+PP^3 = P - I + P P3=2PIP^3 = 2P - I

  • Calculate P4P^4: We can calculate P4P^4 by squaring P2P^2: P4=(P2)2=(IP)2P^4 = (P^2)^2 = (I - P)^2 Expand the square (remembering that for matrices, (AB)2=A2ABBA+B2(A-B)^2 = A^2 - AB - BA + B^2. Since II commutes with any matrix PP, IP=PI=PIP = PI = P, so we can use the familiar (AB)2=A22AB+B2(A-B)^2 = A^2 - 2AB + B^2 pattern): P4=I22IP+P2P^4 = I^2 - 2IP + P^2 Since I2=II^2 = I and IP=PIP = P: P4=I2P+P2P^4 = I - 2P + P^2 Now, substitute P2=IPP^2 = I - P into this expression: P4=I2P+(IP)P^4 = I - 2P + (I - P) P4=I2P+IPP^4 = I - 2P + I - P P4=2I3PP^4 = 2I - 3P

  • Calculate P6P^6: We can calculate P6P^6 by multiplying P4P^4 by P2P^2: P6=P4P2P^6 = P^4 \cdot P^2 Substitute the expressions we found for P4P^4 and P2P^2: P6=(2I3P)(IP)P^6 = (2I - 3P)(I - P) Now, carefully expand this matrix product using the distributive property. Remember that II=II \cdot I = I, IP=PI \cdot P = P, and PI=PP \cdot I = P: P6=2II2IP3PI+3PPP^6 = 2I \cdot I - 2I \cdot P - 3P \cdot I + 3P \cdot P P6=2I2P3P+3P2P^6 = 2I - 2P - 3P + 3P^2 Combine the PP terms: P6=2I5P+3P2P^6 = 2I - 5P + 3P^2 Finally, substitute P2=IPP^2 = I - P one last time into this expression: P6=2I5P+3(IP)P^6 = 2I - 5P + 3(I - P) P6=2I5P+3I3PP^6 = 2I - 5P + 3I - 3P Combine the II terms and PP terms: P6=(2+3)I+(53)PP^6 = (2+3)I + (-5-3)P P6=5I8PP^6 = 5I - 8P

Step 4: Determine the Value of n

We are given the condition Pn=5I8PP^n = 5I - 8P. From our calculations, we found that P6=5I8PP^6 = 5I - 8P. By comparing these two equations, we can conclude that: n=6n = 6


Tips and Common Mistakes

  • Tip 1: Efficiency of Cayley-Hamilton: This theorem is extremely powerful for problems involving higher powers of matrices. Directly calculating P2,P3,P4,P^2, P^3, P^4, \dots by matrix multiplication would be much more tedious and error-prone.
  • Tip 2: Identity Matrix Properties: Always remember that IA=AI=AI \cdot A = A \cdot I = A for any matrix AA of compatible dimensions. Also, Ik=II^k = I for any positive integer kk.
  • Common Mistake 1: Forgetting the Identity Matrix: When applying Cayley-Hamilton, the constant term in the characteristic equation must be multiplied by the identity matrix (c0c_0 becomes c0Ic_0 I). Forgetting this is a common error.
  • Common Mistake 2: Algebraic Errors: Be careful with signs and combining terms during expansion and substitution. A small arithmetic error can lead to a completely different result.
  • Alternative (but less efficient) Method: One could calculate P2P^2, then P3P^3, P4P^4, etc., directly by matrix multiplication until the desired form is reached. However, this is computationally intensive and not recommended for JEE.

Summary and Key Takeaway

This problem beautifully demonstrates the utility of the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem. By first finding the characteristic equation of the matrix PP and then applying the theorem, we obtained a fundamental relation (P2=IPP^2 = I - P) that allowed us to express all higher powers of PP as a linear combination of PP and II. This systematic approach made it straightforward to determine the value of nn for the given equation Pn=5I8PP^n = 5I - 8P. The key takeaway is to always consider using the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem when dealing with higher powers of matrices, as it often provides a much more elegant and efficient solution than direct computation.

Practice More Matrices & Determinants Questions

View All Questions