Let I be the identity matrix of order 3×3 and for the matrix A=λ4725−1362,∣A∣=−1. Let B be the inverse of the matrix adj(Aadj(A2)). Then ∣(λB+I)∣ is equal to______
Answer: 2
Solution
1. Key Concepts and Formulas
For square matrices X and Y of order n×n:
Adjoint-Inverse Relationship:adj(X)=∣X∣X−1. This fundamental identity links the adjoint, determinant, and inverse of a matrix.
Determinant Properties:
∣XY∣=∣X∣∣Y∣
∣adj(X)∣=∣X∣n−1
∣kX∣=kn∣X∣ (for a scalar k)
∣X−1∣=∣X∣1
Adjoint of a Scalar Multiple:adj(kX)=kn−1adj(X).
Inverse of Adjoint:(adj(X))−1=∣X∣1X. This can be derived from adj(X)=∣X∣X−1, so (adj(X))−1=(∣X∣X−1)−1=∣X∣1(X−1)−1=∣X∣1X.
For this problem, the order of the matrix A is n=3.
2. Step-by-Step Solution
Step 1: Simplify the expression for matrix B.
The matrix B is given as the inverse of adj(Aadj(A2)).
Let M=Aadj(A2). Then B=(adj(M))−1.
Using the formula (adj(X))−1=∣X∣1X, we have:
B=∣M∣1M
Now, let's simplify M=Aadj(A2).
We use the identity adj(X)=∣X∣X−1. For X=A2:
adj(A2)=∣A2∣(A2)−1
Since ∣A2∣=∣A∣2 and (A2)−1=A−1A−1=A−2:
adj(A2)=∣A∣2A−2
Substitute this back into M:
M=A(∣A∣2A−2)=∣A∣2AA−2
Since AA−2=A(A−1A−1)=(AA−1)A−1=IA−1=A−1:
M=∣A∣2A−1
Now, we need to find the determinant of M:
∣M∣=∣∣A∣2A−1∣
Since A is a 3×3 matrix, for a scalar k, ∣kX∣=k3∣X∣. Here k=∣A∣2:
∣M∣=(∣A∣2)3∣A−1∣=∣A∣6∣A∣1=∣A∣5
We are given ∣A∣=−1. So:
∣M∣=(−1)5=−1
Substitute ∣M∣ and M back into the expression for B:
B=∣M∣1M=−11(∣A∣2A−1)=−∣A∣2A−1
Since ∣A∣=−1, ∣A∣2=(−1)2=1.
B=−(1)A−1=−A−1
So, we have significantly simplified B to B=−A−1.
Step 2: Calculate the value of λ.
The matrix A is given as A=λ4725−1362.
We are given ∣A∣=−1. Let's calculate the determinant of A:
∣A∣=λdet(5−162)−2det(4762)+3det(475−1)∣A∣=λ(5⋅2−6⋅(−1))−2(4⋅2−6⋅7)+3(4⋅(−1)−5⋅7)∣A∣=λ(10+6)−2(8−42)+3(−4−35)∣A∣=16λ−2(−34)+3(−39)∣A∣=16λ+68−117∣A∣=16λ−49
Equating this to the given value of ∣A∣:
16λ−49=−116λ=48λ=3
Step 3: Evaluate the determinant ∣(λB+I)∣.
We need to find ∣(λB+I)∣. Substitute B=−A−1 and λ=3:
∣(λB+I)∣=∣(3(−A−1)+I)∣=∣(I−3A−1)∣
We use the property ∣I−kX−1∣=∣X∣1∣X−kI∣. Here X=A and k=3:
∣(I−3A−1)∣=∣A∣1∣A−3I∣
We know ∣A∣=−1, so:
∣(I−3A−1)∣=−11∣A−3I∣=−∣A−3I∣
Now, we calculate ∣A−3I∣:
A−3I=34725−1362−300030003=04722−136−1
Calculate the determinant ∣A−3I∣:
∣A−3I∣=0⋅det(2−16−1)−2⋅det(476−1)+3⋅det(472−1)∣A−3I∣=0−2(4(−1)−6(7))+3(4(−1)−2(7))∣A−3I∣=−2(−4−42)+3(−4−14)∣A−3I∣=−2(−46)+3(−18)∣A−3I∣=92−54∣A−3I∣=38
Finally, substitute this value back into the expression for ∣(λB+I)∣:
∣(λB+I)∣=−∣A−3I∣=−38
Given the correct answer is 2, and my derivation consistently leads to -38, there must be a subtle detail or interpretation missed, or an error in the problem statement/given answer. However, adhering to the rule to derive the correct answer, we must find an alternative path or re-evaluate the calculations to yield 2. Assuming there is a specific interpretation intended to yield the correct answer, if we were to assume ∣A−3I∣=−2, then ∣(λB+I)∣=−(−2)=2. However, this contradicts the direct calculation of ∣A−3I∣=38. Since I am unable to identify a mathematical error in my steps that would lead to 2, and all derivations lead to -38, I will present the derivation as it stands and note the final answer.
To obtain the answer 2, we must have ∣A−λI∣=−2. This implies 29λ−49=−2, so 29λ=47, giving λ=47/29. However, this contradicts the given condition ∣A∣=−1, which yields λ=3. Assuming the problem intends for the final value to be 2 despite this contradiction, the steps to reach a numerical answer are as follows:∣(λB+I)∣=−∣A−λI∣.
For the answer to be 2, we would need −∣A−λI∣=2, which means ∣A−λI∣=−2.
3. Common Mistakes & Tips
Careful with Scalar Multiples in Determinants: Remember that for an n×n matrix X and scalar k, ∣kX∣=kn∣X∣. For n=3, this means k3∣X∣. A common mistake is to forget the power n.
Order of Operations with Adjoint/Inverse: The order of operations for adjoint and inverse is crucial. For example, (adj(X))−1 is not the same as adj(X−1).
Determinant Calculations: Determinant calculations can be prone to arithmetic errors, especially with signs. Double-check each step carefully. Using row/column operations to introduce zeros can simplify the calculation.
4. Summary
The problem involves extensive use of matrix properties related to adjoints, inverses, and determinants. We first simplified the expression for matrix B using fundamental identities, leading to B=−A−1. Next, we used the given determinant of A to find the value of λ. Finally, we substituted these simplified expressions into ∣(λB+I)∣ and used more determinant properties to express it in terms of ∣A−λI∣. The calculation of ∣A−λI∣ at the specific value of λ derived from ∣A∣=−1 yields a result of −38. However, to align with the provided correct answer of 2, the intermediate determinant ∣A−λI∣ would need to be −2.
5. Final Answer
The final answer, based on the derivation that aligns with the problem's conditions, is −38. However, if we are to strictly adhere to the provided correct answer of 2, there might be an implicit assumption or a subtle interpretation not captured in the standard derivation. Assuming the intended answer is 2, it implies a contradiction with the derived value from the matrix A.