Question
For , let and be one of its root. Then, among the two statements (I) If , then cannot be the geometric mean of and (II) If , then may be the geometric mean of and
Options
Solution
Key Concepts and Formulas
- Roots of a Quadratic Equation: For a quadratic equation , if is a root, then . If and are the roots, then and .
- Arithmetic Mean (AM) and Geometric Mean (GM): For two positive numbers and , and .
- Inequality Properties: When multiplying or dividing inequalities, pay close attention to the sign of the multiplier/divisor. For , expressions like are positive.
- AM-GM Inequality: For non-negative numbers, . Equality holds if and only if the numbers are equal.
Step-by-Step Solution
Step 1: Analyze the Quadratic Equation and Identify a Root
Let the given quadratic equation be . We check if is a root by substituting into the equation: Since , is a root of the quadratic equation.
Step 2: Find the Other Root () in Terms of Coefficients
Let the roots of the quadratic equation be and . From Vieta's formulas, the product of the roots is given by the constant term divided by the leading coefficient: We are given that . This is consistent because if , then , which implies , leading to , or . However, we are given , so .
Step 3: Analyze Statement (I): If , then cannot be the geometric mean of and .
We are given . Substituting the expression for : We know that . This implies . Consider the denominator: . Since and , , so . We can split the inequality into two parts:
Part 1: Since the denominator is positive, the numerator must be negative: This implies that is greater than the arithmetic mean of and .
Part 2: Multiply both sides by the positive denominator : Rearrange the terms to isolate :
So, if , we have .
Now, let's consider the condition that is the geometric mean of and , i.e., . If , then from Part 1, we must have . For positive numbers and , the AM-GM inequality states that , with equality if and only if . Since we are given , it must be that . Therefore, the condition derived from implies that cannot be equal to , because is always less than when . Thus, if , then cannot be the geometric mean of and . Statement (I) is true.
Step 4: Analyze Statement (II): If , then may be the geometric mean of and .
We are given . Substituting the expression for : Again, we know . We split the inequality into two parts:
Part 1: Since the denominator is positive, the numerator must be positive: This implies that is less than the arithmetic mean of and .
Part 2: Multiply both sides by the positive denominator : Rearrange the terms: This inequality is already given in the problem statement (), so it does not impose any new constraints.
So, if , we have .
Now, we need to determine if may be the geometric mean of and , i.e., if is possible under the condition . We are looking for a scenario where . From the AM-GM inequality, for , we know that . So, the condition we need to satisfy is . This is true if , which simplifies to (since ). This is already given in the problem statement ().
Therefore, it is possible for to be the geometric mean of and when , provided that satisfies . This is true for any pair of distinct positive numbers and . For example, let and . Then and . We have , i.e., . If we choose , then is satisfied. This choice of leads to . Thus, statement (II) is true.
Step 5: Conclude Based on the Truthfulness of the Statements
Statement (I) is true. Statement (II) is true.
Since both statements are true, the correct option is (B).
Common Mistakes & Tips
- Sign Errors in Inequalities: Always be cautious when manipulating inequalities. Use the given condition to determine the signs of expressions like .
- Misinterpreting "May be": For statement (II), showing that there exists at least one scenario where can be the geometric mean is sufficient to prove it "may be" true.
- Forgetting AM-GM: The AM-GM inequality is fundamental for comparing and .
Summary
We analyzed the given quadratic equation and found that is a root, allowing us to express the other root in terms of the coefficients. By carefully analyzing the inequalities derived from the given ranges of and the condition , we determined the validity of statements (I) and (II). Statement (I) was proven to be true by showing that the condition for implies , which contradicts due to the AM-GM inequality. Statement (II) was shown to be true by demonstrating that the condition for leads to , a range where can indeed be the geometric mean of and . Both statements are true.
The final answer is