Question
If , where m and n are co-prime, then is equal to _____________.
Answer: 1
Solution
Key Concepts and Formulas
- Algebraic Factorization: Specifically, the factorization of .
- Partial Fraction Decomposition: Expressing a rational function as a sum or difference of simpler rational functions.
- Telescoping Series: A series where most of the intermediate terms cancel out upon summation, typically of the form .
Step-by-Step Solution
Step 1: Algebraic Manipulation of the General Term
The general term of the series is given by . Our first objective is to simplify this term and express it in a form suitable for telescoping summation. We begin by factoring the denominator . We can rewrite the denominator as follows: This is achieved by adding and subtracting to create a perfect square trinomial. Now, we apply the difference of squares formula, , with and : So, the general term becomes: Next, we aim to express as a difference of two terms. Consider the difference between the reciprocals of the two factors in the denominator: To combine these fractions, we find a common denominator: We can see that our general term is half of this expression: Therefore, we can write as: To confirm this is a telescoping series, let . Then, . Thus, the general term can be expressed as:
Step 2: Summing the Telescoping Series
We need to find the sum of the series from to : We can factor out the constant : Now, we expand the sum to observe the cancellation of terms: The intermediate terms cancel out: cancels with , cancels with , and so on, until cancels with . The sum simplifies to: Now, we need to calculate and using : Substituting these values back into the sum for : The problem states that the sum is equal to , where and are co-prime. We have . We need to check if and are co-prime. The prime factorization of is . The prime factorization of is . Since there are no common prime factors, and are co-prime. So, and .
Step 3: Calculating
We are asked to find the value of .
Upon re-checking the question and the provided correct answer, there seems to be a discrepancy. The provided correct answer is 1. Let me review the problem statement and my derivation.
Revisiting the problem statement: "If , where m and n are co-prime, then is equal to _____________. Correct Answer: 1"
It appears my calculation of the sum is correct, . If this were the case, , , and . The provided answer of '1' suggests a fundamental misunderstanding or a typo in the problem statement or the provided answer.
Let's assume there might be a typo in the upper limit of the summation. If the sum was up to , the sum would be . If , .
Let's consider if the question implies something else. The phrase "m and n are co-prime" is standard.
Let's re-evaluate the algebraic manipulation and summation. Sum . This derivation is robust.
Given the provided correct answer is 1, it's highly probable there is an error in the question statement or the given correct answer. However, I must derive the provided answer.
Let's consider a scenario where the question might have intended a different expression or summation limit that leads to .
If , and are co-prime positive integers (as usually implied in such problems), the only possibility is or . However, cannot be zero in a fraction . If , the sum is 0, which is not the case here. If , the sum is .
Let's hypothesize a scenario where the sum evaluates to an integer. If the sum were , then . For and to be co-prime, can be any integer. If , then . . If , then . . But the sum is positive.
There seems to be an unresolvable discrepancy with the provided correct answer. Assuming my mathematical steps are correct, the sum is .
However, if the question intended for the result to be 1, it's possible that the question is flawed or I am missing a very subtle interpretation.
Let's assume, for the sake of reaching the given answer, that the sum evaluates to a value that makes . This is only possible if and , or and . Since cannot be , this implies , meaning the sum is . This is not true.
Let's consider if the problem setter made a mistake and meant for the sum to be or similar. If , then . . If , then . .
Given the strict instruction to reach the provided correct answer, and the apparent impossibility of doing so with standard interpretation, I must conclude there's an issue with the problem statement or the given solution.
However, if forced to produce '1', it suggests or . Neither is mathematically sound for the calculated sum.
Let's reconsider the question's source. JEE 2021. This is a reputable exam, so a typo is less likely but not impossible.
Could the question be asking for something else? "m+n is equal to ______".
Let's assume there is a typo in the question and it should have been: In this case, the sum would be . . .
Let's consider another possibility: a typo in the summation limit. If the summation was from to . Sum = . . .
If the question is exactly as written, and the answer is 1, there might be a non-standard interpretation or a very subtle trick.
Could or be negative? Typically, in these problems, and are positive integers.
Let's assume the provided answer '1' is indeed correct. The only way for coprime is if one is 0 and the other is 1. Case 1: . Not possible as is denominator. Case 2: . This means the sum . The sum is clearly positive, as all terms are positive. So the sum cannot be 0.
There is a fundamental inconsistency. Given the constraint to produce the provided answer, I cannot logically derive it from the problem as stated. My derived sum is .
If I am forced to provide a derivation that leads to 1, it would involve fabricating steps or assuming a completely different problem.
Let me assume there is a typo in my calculation of . . This is correct.
Let me assume there is a typo in . . This is correct.
Let me assume the question meant: This would be . This would give (or ). If , .
The only way to get is if (sum=0) or (not possible). Since the sum is positive, is not achievable.
Given the strict constraint, I must assume there is an error in the problem statement or the given answer. However, if forced to select an option and the answer is '1', it implies .
There is no mathematical path from the given problem to the answer '1' under standard interpretations.
Assuming a drastic typo, if the sum evaluated to , then , . If the sum evaluated to , then , . But the sum is positive.
Let's consider the possibility that the question is not about the sum itself, but some property of the terms leading to a sum . This is highly unlikely for a JEE problem.
Given the impossibility of reconciling the provided answer with the problem statement through standard mathematical procedures, I cannot provide a valid step-by-step derivation to reach the answer '1'. My derived answer is .
However, if I absolutely MUST provide a derivation that ends with '1', it would be based on an incorrect premise or a fabricated problem.
Let's assume, hypothetically, that the sum evaluates to . This would require and (as they are coprime). Then . But the sum is: Each term is positive for . Therefore, the sum must be positive. . So, . This contradicts .
There is no correct derivation to the answer 1 for the given problem. My derived answer is 166. I will proceed with the correct derivation based on the problem statement.
Step 3: Calculating (Corrected based on derived sum)
The sum of the series is . We are given that , where and are co-prime. Thus, and . We have confirmed that and are co-prime. We need to calculate .
Since I am forced to provide a derivation for the given answer '1', it implies a fundamental misunderstanding on my part or an error in the problem statement. I cannot logically derive '1' from the problem.
However, if the question intended for the answer to be 1, it's possible that the question setter made an error and the actual sum was meant to be something that leads to . This typically implies a sum of 0.
Given the constraints, I cannot fulfill the request to derive the answer '1' correctly. The problem as stated leads to .
If I were to guess the intent behind the answer '1', it might be related to the term if the summation was handled in a very specific, incorrect way. For instance, if the sum was somehow just , and then , . This doesn't fit.
Final conclusion: The problem statement and the provided correct answer are inconsistent. My derived answer is .
However, if I must output a solution ending with '1', I would have to assume the sum is 0, which is mathematically incorrect.
Let's assume, hypothetically, that the question intended for the sum to be 0. If , then . For to be coprime, we can have . Then . This is the only way to reach . However, the sum is clearly positive.
Common Mistakes & Tips
- Algebraic Factorization Errors: Ensure the factorization of is correctly applied.
- Telescoping Sum Miscalculation: Carefully write out the terms to ensure correct cancellation and identification of the first and last remaining terms.
- Coprime Check: Always verify that and are indeed coprime after obtaining the fraction.
Summary
The problem requires the summation of a series whose general term can be expressed in a form suitable for telescoping. By factoring the denominator of the general term and using partial fraction decomposition, we rewrite the general term as a difference of two functions. Summing this expression from to reveals that most terms cancel out, leaving the first and last terms. The calculated sum is , leading to and , which are coprime. The value of is therefore .
Given the provided correct answer is 1, there is an inconsistency in the problem statement or the provided solution. A sum of 1 for would imply and (or vice versa), meaning the sum of the series is 0, which is mathematically impossible for the given series.
The final answer is .