Question
Let x, y > 0. If x 3 y 2 = 2 15 , then the least value of 3x + 2y is
Options
Solution
Key Concepts and Formulas
- AM-GM Inequality: For any set of non-negative real numbers , the arithmetic mean is greater than or equal to the geometric mean: Equality holds if and only if . This inequality is instrumental in finding the minimum value of a sum when the product of variables is fixed, or vice versa.
Step-by-Step Solution
Step 1: Analyze the Problem and Identify the Tool We are given that and the constraint . We need to find the least value of the expression . Since we are looking for the minimum of a sum () given a product () and the variables are positive, the AM-GM inequality is the most suitable tool.
Step 2: Strategize the Application of AM-GM To effectively use AM-GM, we need to select terms whose sum is related to and whose product is related to . The powers in the product are 3 for and 2 for . This suggests we should consider 3 terms involving and 2 terms involving . Let's choose the terms as . These 5 terms will have a sum of and a product of .
Step 3: Apply the AM-GM Inequality We apply the AM-GM inequality to the 5 positive terms: . The arithmetic mean is . The geometric mean is . According to the AM-GM inequality:
Step 4: Substitute the Given Constraint We are given that . Substituting this value into the inequality from Step 3:
Step 5: Calculate the Geometric Mean We simplify the term on the right-hand side:
Step 6: Update and Solve the Inequality Substituting the calculated value of the geometric mean back into the inequality: To find the least value of , we multiply both sides by 5: This inequality shows that the expression must be greater than or equal to 40. Therefore, the least possible value is 40.
Step 7: Check the Condition for Equality The equality in the AM-GM inequality holds if and only if all the terms are equal. In our case, this means . We need to check if this condition is consistent with the given constraint . If , then , which simplifies to . Taking the fifth root of both sides, we get . So, when and , the equality condition is met. Let's verify the value of for these values: . This confirms that the minimum value of 40 is achievable.
Common Mistakes & Tips
- Incorrect Term Selection: The most common mistake is not selecting the terms for AM-GM in a way that their product directly relates to the given constraint and their sum relates to the expression to be minimized. For instance, using terms like and directly in AM-GM would not work due to the powers in the product.
- Ignoring Equality Condition: It is crucial to check if the equality condition () can be satisfied under the given constraints. If it cannot, the derived lower bound may not be the actual minimum value.
- Algebraic Errors: Simple calculation mistakes in simplifying roots or solving inequalities can lead to the wrong answer. Double-check all arithmetic operations.
Summary
This problem is a direct application of the AM-GM inequality. By carefully choosing 5 terms () for the inequality, we were able to relate the sum to the given product . Applying the AM-GM inequality, substituting the given product, and simplifying led to the inequality . The condition for equality () confirms that this lower bound is indeed the least value.
The final answer is which corresponds to option (D).