Key Concepts and Formulas
- Arithmetico-Geometric Progression (AGP): A series where each term is a product of a term from an Arithmetic Progression (AP) and a term from a Geometric Progression (GP).
- Sum to Infinity of an AGP: For an infinite AGP of the form a,(a+d)r,(a+2d)r2,…, the sum to infinity S∞ is given by S∞=1−ra+(1−r)2dr, provided ∣r∣<1.
- Sum to Infinity of a GP: For a GP a,ar,ar2,…, the sum to infinity S∞ is given by S∞=1−ra, provided ∣r∣<1.
Step-by-Step Solution
Step 1: Define the series and identify its structure.
Let the given series be S.
S=1+32+326+3310+3414+…
We can rewrite the terms to see the AP and GP components more clearly.
S=301+312+326+3310+3414+…
Let's examine the numerators: 1,2,6,10,14,…. The differences between consecutive terms are 2−1=1, 6−2=4, 10−6=4, 14−10=4. This indicates that from the second term onwards, the numerators form an AP with the first term 2 and common difference 4. However, the first term 1 doesn't fit this pattern.
Let's re-examine the series structure by looking at the general term.
The denominators are powers of 3: 30,31,32,33,34,…. This is a GP with first term 1 and common ratio rg=3.
Let's look at the numerators again: 1,2,6,10,14,….
If we consider the terms as an, then:
a1=1
a2=2
a3=6
a4=10
a5=14
Let's rewrite the series as:
S=301+312+326+3310+3414+…
We can split the numerators to reveal an AP.
The numerators are 1,2,6,10,14,….
Consider the sequence 1,2,3,4,5,… (an AP with a=1,d=1).
Consider the sequence 0,4,8,12,16,… (an AP with a=0,d=4).
If we add these, we get 1,6,11,16,21,…. This is not matching.
Let's try to represent the numerators as an AP.
The sequence of numerators is 1,2,6,10,14,….
The differences are 1,4,4,4,….
This suggests that the numerators are not a single AP.
Let's consider the terms starting from the second term: 2,6,10,14,…. This is an AP with first term 2 and common difference 4.
Let the terms of the series be Tn.
T1=1
T2=32
T3=326
T4=3310
T5=3414
We can rewrite the series as:
S=1+(32+326+3310+3414+…)
Let S′=32+326+3310+3414+….
The numerators of S′ are 2,6,10,14,…, which form an AP with first term a′=2 and common difference d′=4.
The denominators form a GP with first term 1 and common ratio r=31.
So, S′ is an Arithmetico-Geometric Progression (AGP) with a′=2, d′=4, and r=31.
Step 2: Calculate the sum to infinity of the AGP (S′).
The formula for the sum to infinity of an AGP is S∞=1−ra+(1−r)2dr, where a is the first term of the AP part, d is the common difference of the AP part, and r is the common ratio of the GP part.
For S′, we have a′=2, d′=4, and r=31.
Since ∣r∣=∣31∣<1, the sum to infinity exists.
S′=1−312+(1−31)24×31
S′=322+(32)234
S′=2×23+9434
S′=3+34×49
S′=3+3
S′=6
Step 3: Calculate the total sum (S).
The original series S is 1+S′.
S=1+S′
S=1+6
S=7
Let's re-examine the problem and the given solution. The correct answer is A, which is 3. My calculation leads to 7. This indicates a potential misinterpretation of the series or a mistake in applying the formula.
Let's try the standard method of summing an AGP directly without splitting the series.
S=1+32+326+3310+3414+…(∗)
The common ratio of the geometric part is r=31.
Multiply the series by r:
31S=31+322+336+3410+3514+…(∗∗)
Subtract (**) from (*):
S−31S=(1+32+326+3310+3414+…)−(31+322+336+3410+3514+…)
32S=1+(32−31)+(326−322)+(3310−336)+(3414−3410)+…
32S=1+31+324+334+344+…
32S=1+31+4(321+331+341+…)
The terms in the parenthesis form an infinite geometric series: 91,271,811,….
This GP has first term agp=91 and common ratio rgp=31.
The sum to infinity of this GP is 1−rgpagp=1−3191=3291=91×23=61.
Substitute this sum back into the expression for 32S:
32S=1+31+4(61)
32S=1+31+64
32S=1+31+32
32S=1+(31+32)
32S=1+1
32S=2
Now, solve for S:
S=2×23
S=3
This result matches option (A). The error in the previous attempt was likely in how the series was decomposed or the direct application of the AGP formula without careful verification of the first term's integration into the AP.
Let's re-verify the AGP formula application.
The series is 1+32+326+3310+3414+…
We can write the general term of the series as Tn=3n−1an for n≥1.
The numerators are 1,2,6,10,14,….
Let's consider the numerators as Nn.
N1=1
N2=2
N3=6
N4=10
N5=14
The differences are 1,4,4,4,….
This means the numerators do not form a single AP from the start.
However, if we consider the series as an AGP, we need to identify the first term of the AP (a), the common difference of the AP (d), and the common ratio of the GP (r).
The geometric part has terms 1,31,321,331,…. So, r=31.
The arithmetic part needs to be identified from the numerators.
Let the terms be a,(a+d)r,(a+2d)r2,(a+3d)r3,… in the standard AGP form.
Our series is 1,32,326,3310,3414,….
Comparing the terms:
First term: a=1.
Second term: (a+d)r=32. Substituting a=1 and r=31: (1+d)31=32⟹1+d=2⟹d=1.
Let's check the third term with a=1,d=1,r=31: (a+2d)r2=(1+2(1))(31)2=(3)91=93=31.
But the third term in our series is 326=96=32.
This indicates that the standard AGP formula S∞=1−ra+(1−r)2dr is not directly applicable by simply identifying the first term and common difference in this manner for the given series.
The method of subtracting the series multiplied by r is more robust for such cases where the initial terms might not perfectly fit a simple AP.
The calculation using subtraction of series:
32S=1+31+324+334+344+…
32S=1+31+4(321+331+341+…)
The GP is 91,271,… with a=91 and r=31.
Sum of GP = 1−1/31/9=2/31/9=91×23=61.
32S=1+31+4(61)=1+31+32=1+1=2.
32S=2⟹S=3.
The structure of the series can be seen as:
Term 1: 1=301
Term 2: 32=312
Term 3: 326=322+4
Term 4: 3310=332+2×4
Term 5: 3414=342+3×4
This implies that for n≥2, the numerator is 2+(n−2)×4.
Let's check:
For n=2: 2+(2−2)×4=2. Correct.
For n=3: 2+(3−2)×4=2+4=6. Correct.
For n=4: 2+(4−2)×4=2+8=10. Correct.
So the general term for n≥2 is 3n−12+4(n−2).
The first term is 1.
The series is 1+∑n=2∞3n−12+4(n−2).
Let k=n−1, so n=k+1. When n=2,k=1. When n→∞,k→∞.
∑n=2∞3n−12+4(n−2)=∑k=1∞3k2+4(k+1−2)=∑k=1∞3k2+4(k−1)
=∑k=1∞3k2+∑k=1∞3k4(k−1)
The first part is a GP: 2(31+321+…)=2×1−1/31/3=2×2/31/3=2×21=1.
The second part is an AGP: 4(310+321+332+343+…).
Let S′′=30+321+332+343+….
This is an AGP with a=0, d=1, r=31.
Sum to infinity S′′=1−ra+(1−r)2dr=1−1/30+(1−1/3)21×(1/3)=0+(2/3)21/3=4/91/3=31×49=43.
So, 4S′′=4×43=3.
The sum of the series from the second term onwards is 1+3=4.
The total sum S=1+(sum from second term)=1+4=5.
There seems to be a persistent discrepancy. Let's re-check the subtraction method carefully, as it yielded the correct answer.
32S=1+31+324+334+344+…
This step is correct.
32S=1+31+4(91+271+811+…)
The GP is 91,271,…. First term agp=91, common ratio rgp=31.
Sum of GP = 1−rgpagp=1−1/31/9=2/31/9=91×23=61.
So, 32S=1+31+4×61=1+31+64=1+31+32=1+33=1+1=2.
32S=2.
S=2×23=3.
The subtraction method is confirmed to be correct and leads to the answer 3. The issue in the decomposition method was likely in the assumption of the AP for the numerators for all terms.
Common Mistakes & Tips
- Incorrectly identifying the AP and GP components: Ensure that the first term of the series fits the pattern of the identified AP and GP. If not, use the subtraction method.
- Algebraic errors in series manipulation: Be meticulous when subtracting the series and calculating the sum of the resulting geometric progression.
- Forgetting the condition ∣r∣<1: The sum to infinity of a GP or AGP is only valid if the absolute value of the common ratio is less than 1.
Summary
The given series is an Arithmetico-Geometric Progression (AGP). The most reliable method to find the sum to infinity of such a series, especially when the initial terms do not perfectly align with a simple AP, is to multiply the series by its common ratio (r=31 in this case), shift the terms, and subtract the new series from the original. This process transforms the series into a constant term plus a geometric progression, which can then be summed easily. Applying this method, we found the sum to be 3.
The final answer is \boxed{3}.