Question
Consider the following relations are real numbers and for some rational number ; and are integers such that and . Then
Options
Solution
Key Concepts and Formulas
- Equivalence Relation: A relation on a set is an equivalence relation if it is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
- Reflexivity: For all , .
- Symmetry: For all , if , then .
- Transitivity: For all , if and , then .
- Properties of Rational Numbers: The set of rational numbers is closed under addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division (by non-zero numbers).
Step-by-Step Solution
We need to determine if the relations and are equivalence relations by checking for reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.
Analysis of Relation R
The relation is defined on the set of real numbers, , as:
Step 1: Check Reflexivity for R
- Objective: To check if for every , . This requires us to find a rational number such that .
- Working:
- If , we can divide by to get . Since , the condition is satisfied.
- If , the equation becomes , which is . This is true for any rational number (e.g., ). Thus, .
- Conclusion: For all , . So, is reflexive.
Step 2: Check Symmetry for R
- Objective: To check if for every , if , then . This means if for some , then for some .
- Working:
- Consider a counterexample. Let and .
- Is ? Yes, because , and .
- Now, we check if . This would require for some .
- However, . So, the equation is false. There is no rational number that satisfies this.
- Therefore, .
- Conclusion: Since but , is not symmetric.
Step 3: Check Transitivity for R
- Objective: To check if for every , if and , then . This means if for some and for some , then for some .
- Working:
- Given () and ().
- Substitute the second equation into the first: .
- Since and are rational numbers, their product is also a rational number. Let .
- Thus, where .
- Conclusion: is transitive.
Overall for R: Since is reflexive and transitive but not symmetric, is not an equivalence relation.
Analysis of Relation S
The relation is defined on pairs of rational numbers: Let and . The condition can be rewritten as (by dividing both sides by , which is non-zero). Thus, . This is the equality relation on the set of rational numbers.
Step 4: Check Reflexivity for S
- Objective: To check if for every , . This requires .
- Working: The equality is always true for any rational number .
- Conclusion: is reflexive.
Step 5: Check Symmetry for S
- Objective: To check if for every , if , then . This means if , then .
- Working: If , then it is always true that .
- Conclusion: is symmetric.
Step 6: Check Transitivity for S
- Objective: To check if for every , if and , then . This means if and , then .
- Working: If and , then by the transitive property of equality, .
- Conclusion: is transitive.
Overall for S: Since is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive, is an equivalence relation.
Common Mistakes & Tips
- Division by Zero: Be extremely cautious when dividing by variables. If a variable can be zero, consider that case separately or use a method that avoids division (like multiplying).
- Counterexamples: For disproving symmetry or transitivity, a single, well-chosen counterexample is sufficient. Ensure your counterexample clearly violates the property.
- Simplifying Conditions: For relation , simplifying the condition to greatly clarifies its nature as the equality relation.
Summary
We analyzed relation and found it to be reflexive and transitive, but not symmetric, thus it is not an equivalence relation. We then analyzed relation , which simplifies to the equality relation on rational numbers. This relation was found to be reflexive, symmetric, and transitive, making it an equivalence relation. Therefore, is an equivalence relation, and is not.
The final answer is .