Question
Let Statement - 1 : The set . Statement - 2 : is a bijection.
Options
Solution
Key Concepts and Formulas
- Bijective Function: A function is bijective if it is both injective (one-to-one) and surjective (onto).
- Inverse Function: For a bijective function , the inverse function exists such that for all in the domain of (range of ), and for all in the domain of .
- Solving : If is strictly monotonic (increasing or decreasing), the solutions to are the same as the solutions to .
Step-by-Step Solution
Step 1: Analyze Statement - 2: " is a bijection."
To determine if with is a bijection, we need to check if it's injective and surjective.
Step 1a: Check for Injectivity We take such that . Taking the square root of both sides, we get . Since and , we have and . Therefore, and . So, , which implies . Thus, is injective on its domain .
Step 1b: Determine the Range of The domain of is . For , we have . Squaring this, we get . Subtracting 1, we get . So, the range of is .
Step 1c: Check for Surjectivity For a function to be surjective onto a codomain, its range must be equal to the codomain. If the codomain is not explicitly stated, it is usually assumed to be the set of all real numbers, . The range of is , which is not equal to . Therefore, is not surjective onto . However, if we consider the codomain to be the range of the function, i.e., , then is surjective. For the purpose of finding the inverse function and solving , it is standard to consider the codomain to be the range. Thus, is considered a bijection from to . Statement - 2: " is a bijection." is true (when considering the codomain as its range).
Step 2: Find the Inverse Function
To find the inverse function, we set and solve for in terms of . Taking the square root, we get . Since , , so . Now, we swap and to get the inverse function: The domain of is , which means . This is the range of , as expected.
Step 3: Analyze Statement - 1: "The set ."
Since is strictly increasing on its domain (its derivative for ), we can solve by solving .
Step 3a: Solve This gives two possible solutions: or . Both of these values are in the domain . Let's verify these solutions in : For : . . So, .
For : . . So, .
The set of solutions is indeed . Statement - 1: "The set ." is true.
Step 4: Evaluate the Relationship Between the Statements
Statement - 2 asserts that is a bijection. Statement - 1 provides the solution set for . For a strictly monotonic function, the fact that it is a bijection (onto its range) allows for the existence of its inverse. Furthermore, the property that solutions to lie on is applicable because is strictly monotonic. The bijection property is therefore a prerequisite and a foundational reason why the inverse exists and the method of solving is valid. If were not a bijection, its inverse might not exist or might not be unique, and the equation might not be solvable in this manner or might have different properties. The fact that is a bijection ensures that is well-defined, and its monotonicity allows us to equate with to find the intersection points.
Common Mistakes & Tips
- Domain and Range: Always pay close attention to the domain and range of the function, especially when dealing with inverse functions and square roots.
- Monotonicity: Recognize when a function is strictly monotonic. This is a key property that simplifies solving to . If the function is not monotonic, solutions can also exist where .
- Bijection Requirement: Remember that a function must be bijective for its inverse to exist. If the codomain is not specified, assume it to be the range for the function to be considered a bijection for inverse calculation.
Summary
We first analyzed Statement - 2 and confirmed that the given function with domain is indeed a bijection from to . We then proceeded to find the inverse function . Finally, we analyzed Statement - 1 by solving the equation . Since is strictly increasing on its domain, we solved the equivalent equation , which yielded the solutions and . Both statements were found to be true. The fact that is a bijection is a necessary condition for to exist, and its monotonicity allows us to solve by solving , thus Statement - 2 is a correct explanation for Statement - 1.
The final answer is .