Question
The inverse of is :
Options
Solution
Key Concepts and Formulas
- Finding the Inverse of a Function: To find the inverse of a function , we swap and to get and then solve for . The inverse function is then .
- Logarithm Properties:
- Definition of logarithm: If , then .
- Change of Base Formula: (where is any valid base, usually 10 or ).
- Property of exponents and logarithms: .
- Property of exponents and logarithms: .
Step-by-Step Solution
Step 1: Interchange and We are given the function . To find the inverse, we swap and . This is because the inverse relation is a reflection of the original function across the line .
Step 2: Solve for Our goal is to isolate . The variable is in the exponent, and it's also inside a logarithm. We need to use logarithm properties to bring down. First, let's take the logarithm of both sides of the equation. It's often convenient to use the base of the exponentiation, which is 5 in this case, or a standard base like 10 or . Let's use base 10 for now, as usually denotes . Now, we can use the logarithm property on the right side of the equation. We want to solve for . Currently, is inside the term. Let's rearrange the equation to isolate . Now, we can use the change of base formula for logarithms in reverse. The expression is equivalent to . This means that is the number such that when raised to the base 5, it gives . In other words, using the definition of logarithm (), we can rewrite this equation. However, the options provided have as the subject and an expression involving . Let's go back to the equation from Step 1 and try a different approach to match the options more directly.
Let's re-examine Step 1: This equation already expresses in terms of . The question asks for the inverse of . The inverse relation is obtained by swapping and . So, if the original function is , its inverse relation is . In our case, . Swapping and directly gives: This is one of the options. Let's verify if this is indeed the inverse.
To be absolutely sure, let's continue from and solve for to see if we get back the original function. Take of both sides: Using the property : Now, to solve for , we can exponentiate both sides with base 5: Using the property : This brings us back to the equation we had after swapping and . This confirms that the equation obtained by swapping and represents the inverse relation.
Let's consider the definition of the inverse function. If , then . We have . To find the inverse, we swap and : . This equation directly gives the inverse relation where is expressed in terms of . The question asks for "The inverse of is :". This implies finding the expression for in terms of or finding the expression for in terms of for the inverse function. Option (A) provides in terms of .
Let's analyze the other options to see why they are incorrect.
Option (B): From , we can write . This means . This is not what option (B) is. Let's try to manipulate to see if we can get option (B). Take of both sides of : . This gives .
Let's try to rearrange differently. Take of both sides: Using change of base, . So, . This is the inverse function, .
The question asks for "The inverse of is :". The structure of the options suggests they are providing the inverse relation where is the subject. We started with . The inverse relation is obtained by swapping and : . This exactly matches option (A).
Let's confirm that option (A) is indeed the inverse. If , then the inverse function is found by swapping and and solving for . Original equation: Swap and : This equation expresses in terms of for the inverse relation. The options are given in the form of . Therefore, option (A) is the direct result of swapping and .
Let's verify the composition of the function and its inverse from option (A). Let . From option (A), the inverse relation is . Let's solve this for to get the inverse function . Take of both sides: Now, exponentiate with base 10: So, .
Let's check the composition : Using : Since : Using : . This confirms that is the inverse function.
Now, the question asks for "The inverse of is :". The options are given in the form . The most straightforward interpretation of finding the inverse relation is to swap and . Given . Swapping and gives . This directly matches option (A).
Common Mistakes & Tips
- Confusing Inverse Relation with Inverse Function: The question asks for "The inverse of is :". The options are in the form . The simplest way to represent the inverse relation is by swapping and in the original equation. The inverse function is obtained by solving this inverse relation for .
- Incorrect Application of Logarithm Properties: Ensure accurate use of properties like the change of base formula and the power rule of logarithms. For example, confusing with .
- Misinterpreting the Base of Logarithm: Unless specified, 'log' usually denotes base 10. However, in the context of , it's important to be mindful of the bases involved.
Summary
To find the inverse of a function, we interchange the roles of and in the original equation. Given the function , swapping and directly yields the equation . This equation represents the inverse relation. The options provided are in the form , making option (A) the direct and correct representation of the inverse.
The final answer is \boxed{A}.