The solution for x of the equation 2∫xtt2−1dt=2π is
Options
Solution
Key Concepts and Formulas
Standard Integral of xx2−a21: The integral of the form ∫xx2−a2dx is a standard result. Specifically, for a=1, we have:
∫xx2−1dx=sec−1∣x∣+C
For x>1, this simplifies to sec−1x+C.
An alternative form for x>1 is:
∫xx2−1dx=−sin−1(x1)+C
Fundamental Theorem of Calculus: For a continuous function f(t) on [a,b], the definite integral ∫abf(t)dt can be evaluated by finding an antiderivative F(t) of f(t) (i.e., F′(t)=f(t)) and then computing F(b)−F(a).
Step-by-Step Solution
Step 1: Identify the integrand and the integration limits.
The given equation is:
∫2xtt2−1dt=2π
The integrand is f(t)=tt2−11, and the limits of integration are from 2 to x. We are given that the value of this definite integral is 2π.
Step 2: Find the antiderivative of the integrand.
We recognize the integrand as a standard form. Using the formula ∫xx2−1dx=sec−1x+C (for x>1), the antiderivative of tt2−11 with respect to t is sec−1t. Since the lower limit of integration is 2, which is greater than 1, and we expect x to be such that the integral is defined and positive, we can assume t>1 in the interval of integration.
Alternatively, using the form ∫xx2−1dx=−sin−1(x1)+C (for x>1), the antiderivative is −sin−1(t1).
Let's use the sec−1t form first.
Step 3: Apply the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
Using the antiderivative F(t)=sec−1t, we evaluate the definite integral:
∫2xtt2−1dt=[sec−1t]2x
This means we substitute the upper limit x and subtract the result of substituting the lower limit 2:
sec−1x−sec−1(2)
Step 4: Evaluate the known part of the integral.
We need to find the value of sec−1(2). Let θ=sec−1(2). This means sec(θ)=2. We know that cos(θ)=sec(θ)1=21. The angle whose cosine is 21 in the range [0,π] (the principal range of sec−1) is 4π.
So, sec−1(2)=4π.
Step 5: Set up the equation using the given value of the integral.
Substitute the evaluated parts back into the equation from Step 3 and equate it to the given value of the integral:
sec−1x−4π=2π
Step 6: Solve for x.
Add 4π to both sides of the equation:
sec−1x=2π+4πsec−1x=42π+4πsec−1x=43π
Now, take the secant of both sides to find x:
x=sec(43π)
We know that cos(43π)=−21. Therefore,
x=cos(43π)1=−211=−2
Revisiting the problem with the alternative antiderivative:
Let's use the antiderivative F(t)=−sin−1(t1).
Applying the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus:
∫2xtt2−1dt=[−sin−1(t1)]2x=−sin−1(x1)−(−sin−1(21))=−sin−1(x1)+sin−1(21)
We know that sin−1(21)=4π.
So, the equation becomes:
−sin−1(x1)+4π=2π
Subtract 4π from both sides:
−sin−1(x1)=2π−4π−sin−1(x1)=4π
Multiply by -1:
sin−1(x1)=−4π
Taking the sine of both sides:
x1=sin(−4π)
Since sin(−θ)=−sin(θ):
x1=−sin(4π)x1=−21x=−2
Analysis of the result and options:
Both methods yield x=−2. However, the options provided are all positive. Let's re-examine the domain of the integrand and the inverse trigonometric functions.
The integral ∫tt2−1dt is defined for ∣t∣>1. The lower limit is 2, which is >1. For the definite integral to be meaningful and for the standard formulas of sec−1t and sin−1(1/t) to apply as typically used, we usually assume t>1. If x were −2, the interval of integration would be from 2 to −2, which is in the reverse order.
Let's consider the possibility that the question implies x>1. If x>1, then sec−1x is in [0,π/2) and −sin−1(1/x) is in (−π/2,0]. The value of the integral is π/2, which is positive.
Let's re-evaluate sec−1x=43π. The range of sec−1x is [0,π] excluding π/2. For x<0, sec−1x is in (π/2,π]. The value 43π is in this range. If x=sec(43π)=−2, then the interval of integration is [2,−2].
Consider the case where x is such that the integral is π/2. If x>2, then sec−1x>sec−1(2)=π/4. So sec−1x−π/4>0.
If x<2 (and x>1), then sec−1x<sec−1(2)=π/4. So sec−1x−π/4<0.
Let's consider the principal value of the integral. The problem statement does not restrict x to be positive. However, given the options, it is highly probable that x>1 is intended.
Let's re-examine the equation sec−1x=43π. This implies x=sec(43π)=−2.
If x=−2, the integral is ∫2−2tt2−1dt=−∫−22tt2−1dt. This integral is problematic.
Let's assume the question implicitly means x>1.
If x>1, then sec−1x is in [0,π/2).
The equation is sec−1x−sec−1(2)=π/2.
sec−1x−π/4=π/2.
sec−1x=3π/4.
This gives x=sec(3π/4)=−2, which contradicts x>1.
There might be an issue with the standard formula's application or interpretation if we assume x>1. Let's review the problem and options carefully. The correct answer is given as (A) 23. This value is less than 1. The integral ∫tt2−1dt is defined for ∣t∣>1. If x=23, then x<1, and the integral ∫23/2tt2−1dt is not defined because the interval of integration includes values between 1 and 2, and also values less than 1 where t2−1 is not real.
Let's consider the possibility that the problem intends a different standard integral form or a transformation.
Let's assume there is a typo in the question or the provided answer. If we assume the question is correct and the answer is correct, we need to find a way to reach it.
Let's consider the integral ∫tt2−1dt.
If we let t=secθ, then dt=secθtanθdθ.
t2−1=sec2θ−1=tan2θ=∣tanθ∣.
If t>1, we can assume θ∈(0,π/2), so tanθ>0.
The integral becomes ∫secθtanθsecθtanθdθ=∫dθ=θ+C.
Since t=secθ, θ=sec−1t. So the antiderivative is sec−1t.
When t=2, secθ=2, so θ=sec−1(2)=π/4.
When t=x, θ=sec−1x.
So the integral is [sec−1t]2x=sec−1x−π/4.
We are given sec−1x−π/4=π/2.
sec−1x=3π/4.
x=sec(3π/4)=−2.
This result is consistently obtained. Let's check if there's any other standard integral that might fit.
The form tt2−11 is very specific.
Could the question be about a different inverse trigonometric function?
The integral ∫1−x2dx=sin−1x+C.
The integral ∫1+x2dx=tan−1x+C.
Let's reconsider the options. If the answer is (A) 23, then x=23.
The integral is from 2 to 23. This interval is from a value >1 to a value <1. This is problematic for the real-valued nature of t2−1.
Let's assume there is a typo in the lower limit or the integrand.
If the lower limit was, say, 1, the integral would be improper.
Let's assume the question and answer are correct and try to work backwards in a different way.
If x=23, then the integral is ∫23/2tt2−1dt=2π.
This is impossible because t2−1 is not real for t∈(23,1).
Let's consider the possibility that the question is from a specific context where a non-standard interpretation is used, or there is a known error in the problem source.
Given the provided correct answer is (A) 23, and the standard integral formula leads to x=−2, there is a significant discrepancy.
Let's consider a scenario where the integral is intended to be evaluated over a domain where t2−1 might be negative, but this is not typical for JEE problems unless complex numbers are involved, which is unlikely here.
Let's assume there is a typo in the question and the lower limit is actually something else, or the integrand is different.
If we force the answer to be 23, it implies that sec−1(23)−sec−1(2)=2π (or some variation).
However, sec−1(23) is not defined for real numbers since 23<1.
Let's consider the alternative form of the integral: ∫xx2−1dx=−sin−1(1/x)+C.
If x=23, then 1/x=32. sin−1(2/3) is not defined.
Let's look at the options again.
(A) 23
(B) 22
(C) 2
If x=2, then sec−1(2)−sec−1(2)=3π−4π=124π−3π=12π=2π.
If x=22, then sec−1(22)−sec−1(2)=sec−1(22)−4π.
sec(π/2)=∞, sec(0)=1.
sec−1(22) is some angle.
Let α=sec−1(22). Then sec(α)=22. cos(α)=221.
α=cos−1(221).
This does not seem to simplify to 2π+4π=43π.
Given the provided solution is (A), and our derivation consistently leads to x=−2, there is a strong indication of an error in the problem statement or the provided answer. However, as per the instructions, I must work towards the given correct answer. This is not possible with the standard interpretation of the integral and its formulas.
Let's assume that the question actually intended for the integral to be evaluated in a way that yields one of the positive options.
If we assume the question is correct, and the answer is correct, there must be a misunderstanding of the integral's definition or the properties of the functions involved.
Let's consider the possibility that the question meant x∫2tt2−1dt=2π.
Then sec−1(2)−sec−1(x)=π/2.
π/4−sec−1(x)=π/2.
−sec−1(x)=π/4.
sec−1(x)=−π/4. This has no real solution for x.
Let's consider the possibility that the integral is 2∫xt1−t2dt. This would involve sin−1t.
If the integral was ∫1−t2dt, the antiderivative is sin−1t.
If the integral was ∫t1−t2dt, let t=sinu, dt=cosudu.
∫sinu1−sin2ucosudu=∫sinucosucosudu=∫sinudu=∫cscudu=ln∣cscu−cotu∣+C.
cscu=1/t, cotu=1−t2/t.
So, ln∣t1−t1−t2∣=ln∣t1−1−t2∣.
This does not seem to lead to the given answer.
Given the constraint to reach the correct answer (A) 23, and the impossibility of doing so with the standard interpretation of the provided integral, I cannot provide a valid step-by-step derivation. The problem as stated, with the given options and correct answer, appears to be flawed.
However, if we hypothetically assume that the equation somehow leads to sec−1(x)=4π+3π or some combination that results in x=23, it would require a non-standard interpretation or a modified problem.
Let's suppose, for the sake of reaching the answer, that the result of the integral somehow leads to an equation where sec−1(x)=4π+θ such that sec(4π+θ)=23. This is impossible as sec(θ)≥1 for real θ.
There is a possibility that the integral was intended to be:
x∫2tt2−1dt=2π
Then sec−1(2)−sec−1(x)=π/2.
π/4−sec−1(x)=π/2.
−sec−1(x)=π/4, so sec−1(x)=−π/4. No real x.
If the equation was:
2∫xtt2−1dt=−2π
Then sec−1(x)−π/4=−π/2.
sec−1(x)=−π/4. No real x.
Let's assume the problem meant:
2∫xtt2−1dt=4π
Then sec−1(x)−π/4=π/4.
sec−1(x)=π/2. This implies x approaches infinity, not an option.
Given the unresolvable discrepancy, I cannot provide a valid step-by-step solution that reaches the correct answer (A). The standard mathematical interpretation of the given integral equation does not yield any of the provided positive options, and specifically not 23, which is less than 1 and thus outside the domain of the integrand's real-valued square root part.
Common Mistakes & Tips
Domain Issues: Always check the domain of the integrand, especially when square roots of expressions involving the variable are present. For t2−1 to be real, we must have t2≥1, meaning ∣t∣≥1. If the integration interval includes values where t2−1<0, the integral is not real-valued.
Principal Values of Inverse Trigonometric Functions: Be mindful of the principal ranges of inverse trigonometric functions (e.g., sec−1x∈[0,π]∖{π/2}). This affects the interpretation of the results.
Standard Integral Formulas: Memorize common integral formulas, particularly those involving inverse trigonometric functions, as they are frequently tested.
Summary
The problem requires evaluating a definite integral with a standard integrand of the form tt2−11. The antiderivative of this function is sec−1t. Applying the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and the given value of the integral, we set up an equation for x. Standard evaluation leads to x=−2. However, this result is not among the positive options provided, and the option (A) 23 is problematic as it falls outside the domain where the integrand is real-valued. Due to this discrepancy, a valid derivation leading to option (A) cannot be provided with the current problem statement and standard mathematical principles.