Key Concepts and Formulas
- Tautology: A statement that is always true, regardless of the truth values of its component propositions.
- Truth Tables: A table that lists all possible combinations of truth values for the component propositions and the resulting truth value of the compound proposition.
- Logical Equivalences:
- P→Q≡¬P∨Q
- ¬(P∧Q)≡¬P∨¬Q (De Morgan's Law)
- ¬(P∨Q)≡¬P∧¬Q (De Morgan's Law)
- P∨(P∧Q)≡P (Absorption Law)
- P∧(P∨Q)≡P (Absorption Law)
- P∨False≡P
- P∧True≡P
- P∨True≡True
- P∧False≡False
- P∨¬P≡True
- P∧¬P≡False
Step-by-Step Solution
We will analyze each option to determine if it is a tautology.
Option A: P∧(P∨Q)
Step 1: Construct the truth table for P∧(P∨Q).
- We need to consider all possible combinations of truth values for P and Q.
- We calculate P∨Q first, then P∧(P∨Q).
| P | Q | P ∨ Q | P ∧ (P ∨ Q) |
|---|
| T | T | T | T |
| T | F | T | T |
| F | T | T | F |
| F | F | F | F |
Step 2: Analyze the truth table.
- The last column, representing P∧(P∨Q), is not always true. It is only true when P is true.
- Therefore, option A is not a tautology.
- Note that P∧(P∨Q)≡P (Absorption Law).
Option B: P∨(P∧Q)
Step 1: Construct the truth table for P∨(P∧Q).
- We need to consider all possible combinations of truth values for P and Q.
- We calculate P∧Q first, then P∨(P∧Q).
| P | Q | P ∧ Q | P ∨ (P ∧ Q) |
|---|
| T | T | T | T |
| T | F | F | T |
| F | T | F | F |
| F | F | F | F |
Step 2: Analyze the truth table.
- The last column, representing P∨(P∧Q), is not always true. It is only true when P is true.
- Therefore, option B is not a tautology.
- Note that P∨(P∧Q)≡P (Absorption Law).
Option C: Q→(P∧(P→Q))
Step 1: Rewrite the expression using logical equivalences.
- Q→(P∧(P→Q))≡¬Q∨(P∧(¬P∨Q))
Step 2: Simplify the expression.
- ¬Q∨(P∧(¬P∨Q))≡¬Q∨((P∧¬P)∨(P∧Q))
- ¬Q∨((P∧¬P)∨(P∧Q))≡¬Q∨(False∨(P∧Q))
- ¬Q∨(False∨(P∧Q))≡¬Q∨(P∧Q)
- ¬Q∨(P∧Q)≡(¬Q∨P)∧(¬Q∨Q)
- (¬Q∨P)∧(¬Q∨Q)≡(¬Q∨P)∧True
- (¬Q∨P)∧True≡¬Q∨P
- P∨¬Q is not a tautology.
Step 3: Construct the truth table for ¬Q∨P.
| P | Q | ¬Q | P ∨ ¬Q |
|---|
| T | T | F | T |
| T | F | T | T |
| F | T | F | F |
| F | F | T | T |
Step 4: Analyze the truth table.
- The last column, representing ¬Q∨P, is not always true.
- Therefore, option C is not a tautology.
Option D: (P∧(P→Q))→Q
Step 1: Rewrite the expression using logical equivalences.
- (P∧(P→Q))→Q≡(P∧(¬P∨Q))→Q
- (P∧(¬P∨Q))→Q≡¬(P∧(¬P∨Q))∨Q
Step 2: Simplify the expression.
- ¬(P∧(¬P∨Q))∨Q≡¬((P∧¬P)∨(P∧Q))∨Q
- ¬((P∧¬P)∨(P∧Q))∨Q≡¬(False∨(P∧Q))∨Q
- ¬(False∨(P∧Q))∨Q≡¬(P∧Q)∨Q
- ¬(P∧Q)∨Q≡(¬P∨¬Q)∨Q
- (¬P∨¬Q)∨Q≡¬P∨(¬Q∨Q)
- ¬P∨(¬Q∨Q)≡¬P∨True
- ¬P∨True≡True
Step 3: Analyze the simplified expression.
- Since the expression simplifies to True, it is a tautology.
Common Mistakes & Tips
- Be careful with the order of operations when applying logical equivalences.
- Remember De Morgan's Laws and Absorption Laws to simplify expressions.
- When using truth tables, ensure you cover all possible combinations of truth values.
- Recognizing common patterns and equivalences can greatly simplify the process.
Summary
We analyzed each option to determine if it is a tautology. Options A, B, and C were shown not to be tautologies. Option D, after simplification using logical equivalences, resulted in True, indicating that it is a tautology.
Final Answer
The final answer is \boxed{(P \wedge (P \to Q)) \to Q}, which corresponds to option (D).