Key Concepts and Formulas
- Implication: p→q≡∼p∨q
- De Morgan's Laws: ∼(p∧q)≡∼p∨∼q and ∼(p∨q)≡∼p∧∼q
- Tautology: A statement that is always true, regardless of the truth values of its components. We denote a tautology by t.
- Contradiction: A statement that is always false, regardless of the truth values of its components.
- Law of Excluded Middle: p∨∼p≡t
- Identity Laws: p∨t≡t and p∧t≡p
Step-by-Step Solution
Step 1: Analyze option (A): (p∧q)→(∼p)∨q
We want to determine if (p∧q)→(∼p)∨q is a tautology. We will use the implication rule to rewrite the expression.
(p∧q)→(∼p)∨q≡∼(p∧q)∨(∼p∨q)
Using De Morgan's Law, we can rewrite ∼(p∧q) as ∼p∨∼q.
∼(p∧q)∨(∼p∨q)≡(∼p∨∼q)∨(∼p∨q)
Using the associative property of ∨, we can rearrange the terms.
(∼p∨∼q)∨(∼p∨q)≡∼p∨(∼q∨q)
By the Law of Excluded Middle, ∼q∨q≡t.
∼p∨(∼q∨q)≡∼p∨t
Since ∼p∨t is always true, the expression is a tautology.
∼p∨t≡t
Step 2: Analyze option (B): (p∧q)→p
We want to determine if (p∧q)→p is a tautology. We use the implication rule.
(p∧q)→p≡∼(p∧q)∨p
Using De Morgan's Law, we rewrite ∼(p∧q) as ∼p∨∼q.
∼(p∧q)∨p≡(∼p∨∼q)∨p
Using the associative property of ∨, we can rearrange the terms.
(∼p∨∼q)∨p≡(∼p∨p)∨∼q
By the Law of Excluded Middle, ∼p∨p≡t.
(∼p∨p)∨∼q≡t∨∼q
Since t∨∼q is always true, the expression is a tautology.
t∨∼q≡t
Step 3: Analyze option (C): (p∨q)→(p∨(∼q))
We want to determine if (p∨q)→(p∨(∼q)) is a tautology. We use the implication rule.
(p∨q)→(p∨(∼q))≡∼(p∨q)∨(p∨(∼q))
Using De Morgan's Law, we rewrite ∼(p∨q) as ∼p∧∼q.
∼(p∨q)∨(p∨(∼q))≡(∼p∧∼q)∨(p∨∼q)
Using the associative property of ∨, we can rewrite the expression as
(∼p∧∼q)∨(p∨∼q)≡(∼p∧∼q)∨(p∨∼q)≡(∼q∧∼p)∨(∼q∨p)
Using the distributive property: a∨(b∧c)=(a∨b)∧(a∨c) and a∧(b∨c)=(a∧b)∨(a∧c)
We have ∼q∧∼p and ∼q∨p.
(∼q∧∼p)∨(∼q∨p)≡∼q∧∼p∨p∨∼q≡∼q∨p∧∼p∨∼q
Rearranging terms using the commutative property of ∨ and ∧:
(∼p∧∼q)∨(p∨∼q)≡∼q∧∼p∨p∨∼q
(∼q∧∼p)∨(p∨∼q)≡∼q∨(∼p∧p)∨p≡∼q∨(∼p∧p)∨p
Rearranging terms:
(∼p∧∼q)∨(p∨∼q)≡(∼p∧∼q)∨(p∨∼q)≡∼q∨(∼p∧p)
This simplifies to ∼q since (∼p∧p) is a contradiction.
∼q∨(∼p∧p)≡∼q∨f≡∼q
Since ∼q is not always true, the expression is not a tautology.
Step 4: Analyze option (D): p→(p∨q)
We want to determine if p→(p∨q) is a tautology. We use the implication rule.
p→(p∨q)≡∼p∨(p∨q)
Using the associative property of ∨, we can rearrange the terms.
∼p∨(p∨q)≡(∼p∨p)∨q
By the Law of Excluded Middle, ∼p∨p≡t.
(∼p∨p)∨q≡t∨q
Since t∨q is always true, the expression is a tautology.
t∨q≡t
Common Mistakes & Tips
- Remember to apply De Morgan's Laws correctly. A common mistake is forgetting to negate both terms and change the operator.
- When simplifying expressions, use the associative and commutative properties to group terms that can be simplified using the Law of Excluded Middle.
- Don't assume an expression is a tautology without fully simplifying it.
Summary
We analyzed each option to determine if it is a tautology. Options (A), (B), and (D) simplified to t, indicating they are tautologies. Option (C) simplified to ∼q, which is not always true, meaning it is not a tautology. Therefore, the statement that is not a tautology is option (C).
Final Answer
The final answer is \boxed{( p \vee q) \to ( p \vee (~q))}, which corresponds to option (C).