Question
If and are three sets such that and , then :
Options
Solution
Key Concepts and Formulas
- Set Equality: Two sets and are equal () if and only if and . This means every element in is in , and every element in is in .
- Set Decomposition: Any set can be decomposed with respect to another set using the identity , where is the complement of . This partitions into two disjoint parts: elements common to and , and elements in but not in .
- Properties of Set Operations: We will use the commutative property of intersection () and the definition of union and set difference.
Step-by-Step Solution
We are given two conditions for sets and :
We need to determine the relationship between and .
Step 1: Decompose Sets and using Set
To prove that , we will show that their corresponding components, when decomposed with respect to , are equal. Using the set decomposition identity, we can write: (Equation 1) (Equation 2)
Our goal is to prove that and .
Step 2: Utilize the First Given Condition ()
The first given condition directly provides the equality for the first part of our decomposition: Since set intersection is commutative, we can rewrite this as: (Result 1) This establishes the equality of the first components.
Step 3: Utilize the Second Given Condition () to Prove Equality of the Second Components
Now we need to show that . This is equivalent to showing . We will prove this by showing mutual inclusion: and .
-
Part 3a: Prove Let be an arbitrary element such that . By the definition of set difference, this means and . Since , it must also be an element of (because ). We are given that . Therefore, . The condition implies that or . However, we know from our initial assumption that . Therefore, if and , it must be that . So, we have and . By the definition of set difference, this means . Thus, we have shown that if , then . This implies .
-
Part 3b: Prove Let be an arbitrary element such that . By the definition of set difference, this means and . Since , it must also be an element of . We are given that . Therefore, . The condition implies that or . However, we know from our initial assumption that . Therefore, if and , it must be that . So, we have and . By the definition of set difference, this means . Thus, we have shown that if , then . This implies .
Since and , we can conclude: Using the identity , we get: (Result 2) This establishes the equality of the second components.
Step 4: Combine Results to Conclude Set Equality
We have established the equality of both corresponding components:
- From Result 1:
- From Result 2:
Substitute these equalities back into the decomposition equations (Equation 1 and Equation 2):
Since both and are equal to the same expression , we can conclude that .
Common Mistakes & Tips
- Cancellation Law for Sets: Do not assume that implies on its own. Both intersection and union conditions are necessary.
- Element-wise Proof: For proving set equality or subset relations, starting with an arbitrary element and showing it belongs to the other set is a rigorous and universally applicable method.
- Decomposition Strategy: Breaking down sets based on another set ( in this case) into disjoint parts is a powerful technique when dealing with conditions involving intersections and unions with that set.
Summary
By decomposing sets and into components relative to set (namely, elements within and elements outside ), we used the given conditions to prove that the corresponding components of and are equal. Specifically, directly gave us , and the condition , combined with an element-wise proof, allowed us to show that , which implies . Since both disjoint components of are equal to the corresponding components of , we conclude that .
The final answer is .