Skip to main content
Back to Sets, Relations & Functions
JEE Main 2024
Sets, Relations & Functions
Sets and Relations
Medium

Question

Let a relation R\mathrm{R} on N×N\mathrm{N} \times \mathbb{N} be defined as: (x1,y1)R(x2,y2)\left(x_1, y_1\right) \mathrm{R}\left(x_2, y_2\right) if and only if x1x2x_1 \leq x_2 or y1y2y_1 \leq y_2. Consider the two statements: (I) R\mathrm{R} is reflexive but not symmetric. (II) R\mathrm{R} is transitive Then which one of the following is true?

Options

Solution

Key Concepts and Formulas

  • Reflexive Relation: A relation RR on a set AA is reflexive if for every aAa \in A, (a,a)R(a, a) \in R.
  • Symmetric Relation: A relation RR on a set AA is symmetric if for all a,bAa, b \in A, if (a,b)R(a, b) \in R, then (b,a)R(b, a) \in R.
  • Transitive Relation: A relation RR on a set AA is transitive if for all a,b,cAa, b, c \in A, if (a,b)R(a, b) \in R and (b,c)R(b, c) \in R, then (a,c)R(a, c) \in R.
  • Natural Numbers (N\mathbb{N}): The set of positive integers {1,2,3,}\{1, 2, 3, \ldots\}.

Step-by-Step Solution

The relation RR is defined on the set N×N\mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}. An element of this set is an ordered pair of natural numbers, e.g., (x,y)(x, y) where x,yNx, y \in \mathbb{N}. The relation is given by: (x1,y1)R(x2,y2)if and only ifx1x2 or y1y2(x_1, y_1) \mathrm{R}\left(x_2, y_2\right) \quad \text{if and only if} \quad x_1 \leq x_2 \text{ or } y_1 \leq y_2

Step 1: Check for Reflexivity To determine if RR is reflexive, we need to check if for any arbitrary element (x,y)N×N(x, y) \in \mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}, the condition (x,y)R(x,y)(x, y) \mathrm{R} (x, y) holds. According to the definition of RR, (x,y)R(x,y)(x, y) \mathrm{R} (x, y) is true if xxx \leq x or yyy \leq y. For any natural number xx, the inequality xxx \leq x is always true. Similarly, yyy \leq y is always true for any natural number yy. Since at least one of the conditions (xxx \leq x or yyy \leq y) is true (in fact, both are true), the compound statement is true. Thus, for every (x,y)N×N(x, y) \in \mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}, (x,y)R(x,y)(x, y) \mathrm{R} (x, y) is true. Therefore, the relation RR is reflexive.

Step 2: Check for Symmetry To determine if RR is symmetric, we need to check if for any two elements (x1,y1)(x_1, y_1) and (x2,y2)(x_2, y_2) in N×N\mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}, if (x1,y1)R(x2,y2)(x_1, y_1) \mathrm{R} (x_2, y_2) is true, then (x2,y2)R(x1,y1)(x_2, y_2) \mathrm{R} (x_1, y_1) must also be true. We can try to find a counterexample. Let's choose (x1,y1)=(2,1)(x_1, y_1) = (2, 1) and (x2,y2)=(1,2)(x_2, y_2) = (1, 2). First, let's check if (2,1)R(1,2)(2, 1) \mathrm{R} (1, 2) is true. The condition for this is x1x2x_1 \leq x_2 or y1y2y_1 \leq y_2. Substituting the values, we get 212 \leq 1 or 121 \leq 2. The statement 212 \leq 1 is false. The statement 121 \leq 2 is true. Since 121 \leq 2 is true, the condition "212 \leq 1 or 121 \leq 2" is true. So, (2,1)R(1,2)(2, 1) \mathrm{R} (1, 2) is true.

Now, let's check if (1,2)R(2,1)(1, 2) \mathrm{R} (2, 1) is true. The condition for this is x2x1x_2 \leq x_1 or y2y1y_2 \leq y_1. Substituting the values, we get 121 \leq 2 or 212 \leq 1. The statement 121 \leq 2 is true. The statement 212 \leq 1 is false. Since 121 \leq 2 is true, the condition "121 \leq 2 or 212 \leq 1" is true. So, (1,2)R(2,1)(1, 2) \mathrm{R} (2, 1) is true.

Let's try another counterexample to disprove symmetry. Let (x1,y1)=(1,2)(x_1, y_1) = (1, 2) and (x2,y2)=(3,1)(x_2, y_2) = (3, 1). Check (1,2)R(3,1)(1, 2) \mathrm{R} (3, 1): 131 \leq 3 or 212 \leq 1. Since 131 \leq 3 is true, (1,2)R(3,1)(1, 2) \mathrm{R} (3, 1) is true. Check (3,1)R(1,2)(3, 1) \mathrm{R} (1, 2): 313 \leq 1 or 121 \leq 2. Since 121 \leq 2 is true, (3,1)R(1,2)(3, 1) \mathrm{R} (1, 2) is true.

Let's try a counterexample where one condition holds for the first pair, and we want to see if the reverse holds. Consider (x1,y1)=(1,2)(x_1, y_1) = (1, 2) and (x2,y2)=(3,4)(x_2, y_2) = (3, 4). Check (1,2)R(3,4)(1, 2) \mathrm{R} (3, 4): 131 \leq 3 or 242 \leq 4. Both are true, so the statement is true. Now, check (3,4)R(1,2)(3, 4) \mathrm{R} (1, 2): 313 \leq 1 or 424 \leq 2. 313 \leq 1 is false. 424 \leq 2 is false. Since both parts of the 'or' are false, the statement "313 \leq 1 or 424 \leq 2" is false. Thus, we have found a case where (1,2)R(3,4)(1, 2) \mathrm{R} (3, 4) is true, but (3,4)R(1,2)(3, 4) \mathrm{R} (1, 2) is false. Therefore, the relation RR is not symmetric.

Step 3: Check for Transitivity To determine if RR is transitive, we need to check if for any three elements (x1,y1)(x_1, y_1), (x2,y2)(x_2, y_2), and (x3,y3)(x_3, y_3) in N×N\mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}, if (x1,y1)R(x2,y2)(x_1, y_1) \mathrm{R} (x_2, y_2) and (x2,y2)R(x3,y3)(x_2, y_2) \mathrm{R} (x_3, y_3) are both true, then (x1,y1)R(x3,y3)(x_1, y_1) \mathrm{R} (x_3, y_3) must also be true. We can try to find a counterexample. Let (x1,y1)=(3,9)(x_1, y_1) = (3, 9), (x2,y2)=(4,6)(x_2, y_2) = (4, 6), and (x3,y3)=(2,7)(x_3, y_3) = (2, 7).

First, check if (x1,y1)R(x2,y2)(x_1, y_1) \mathrm{R} (x_2, y_2), i.e., (3,9)R(4,6)(3, 9) \mathrm{R} (4, 6). The condition is 343 \leq 4 or 969 \leq 6. 343 \leq 4 is true. 969 \leq 6 is false. Since 343 \leq 4 is true, the statement "343 \leq 4 or 969 \leq 6" is true. So, (3,9)R(4,6)(3, 9) \mathrm{R} (4, 6) is true.

Next, check if (x2,y2)R(x3,y3)(x_2, y_2) \mathrm{R} (x_3, y_3), i.e., (4,6)R(2,7)(4, 6) \mathrm{R} (2, 7). The condition is 424 \leq 2 or 676 \leq 7. 424 \leq 2 is false. 676 \leq 7 is true. Since 676 \leq 7 is true, the statement "424 \leq 2 or 676 \leq 7" is true. So, (4,6)R(2,7)(4, 6) \mathrm{R} (2, 7) is true.

Now, we must check if (x1,y1)R(x3,y3)(x_1, y_1) \mathrm{R} (x_3, y_3) is true, i.e., (3,9)R(2,7)(3, 9) \mathrm{R} (2, 7). The condition is 323 \leq 2 or 979 \leq 7. 323 \leq 2 is false. 979 \leq 7 is false. Since both parts of the 'or' are false, the statement "323 \leq 2 or 979 \leq 7" is false. So, (3,9)R(2,7)(3, 9) \mathrm{R} (2, 7) is false.

We have found a case where (3,9)R(4,6)(3, 9) \mathrm{R} (4, 6) and (4,6)R(2,7)(4, 6) \mathrm{R} (2, 7) are both true, but (3,9)R(2,7)(3, 9) \mathrm{R} (2, 7) is false. Therefore, the relation RR is not transitive.

Step 4: Evaluate the Statements Statement (I): RR is reflexive but not symmetric. From Step 1, RR is reflexive. From Step 2, RR is not symmetric. Thus, Statement (I) is true.

Statement (II): RR is transitive. From Step 3, RR is not transitive. Thus, Statement (II) is false.

Common Mistakes & Tips

  • Confusing "and" and "or": The definition of the relation uses "or", which means the condition is satisfied if at least one part is true. This is crucial for checking transitivity.
  • General vs. Specific: To prove reflexivity or transitivity, you must consider general cases. To disprove symmetry or transitivity, a single specific counterexample is sufficient.
  • Natural Numbers: Remember that N\mathbb{N} usually refers to positive integers {1,2,3,}\{1, 2, 3, \ldots\}. The properties of inequalities hold for these numbers.

Summary We analyzed the given relation RR on N×N\mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N} by checking its reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. We found that RR is reflexive because for any pair (x,y)(x, y), xxx \leq x or yyy \leq y is always true. We demonstrated that RR is not symmetric by providing a counterexample where (1,2)R(3,4)(1, 2) \mathrm{R} (3, 4) but (3,4)R(1,2)(3, 4) \mathrm{R} (1, 2) is false. Similarly, we showed RR is not transitive with a counterexample involving three pairs. Based on these findings, statement (I) "R is reflexive but not symmetric" is true, and statement (II) "R is transitive" is false. Therefore, only statement (I) is correct.

The final answer is D\boxed{D}.

Practice More Sets, Relations & Functions Questions

View All Questions