Question
Let and be two relations defined on by and Then,
Options
Solution
Key Concepts and Formulas
- Equivalence Relation: A relation on a set is an equivalence relation if it is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
- Reflexive: For all , .
- Symmetric: For all , if , then .
- Transitive: For all , if and , then .
Step-by-Step Solution
Step 1: Analyze Relation ()
We need to check if is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive on .
-
Reflexivity: For any , we check if . This means , which is . Since the square of any real number is always non-negative, is reflexive.
-
Symmetry: For any , if , we check if . If , then . Since multiplication of real numbers is commutative (), we have . Thus, is true. is symmetric.
-
Transitivity: For any , if and , we check if . This means and . Consider the case when . If , then (which is , true for any ) and (which is , true for any ). However, if we choose and , then and are satisfied with , but means , which is , and this is false. Therefore, is not transitive.
Since is not transitive, it is not an equivalence relation.
Step 2: Analyze Relation ()
We need to check if is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive on .
-
Reflexivity: For any , we check if . This means . This is true for all real numbers. is reflexive.
-
Symmetry: For any , if , we check if . If , then . This does not imply . For example, if and , then is true, but is false. Therefore, is not symmetric.
-
Transitivity: For any , if and , we check if . If and , then by the transitive property of inequalities, . Therefore, is transitive.
Since is not symmetric, it is not an equivalence relation.
Step 3: Conclusion
From Step 1, is not an equivalence relation because it is not transitive. From Step 2, is not an equivalence relation because it is not symmetric.
Therefore, neither nor is an equivalence relation.
Common Mistakes & Tips
- Thorough Checking: Always verify all three properties (reflexivity, symmetry, transitivity) for a relation to be an equivalence relation. Failing even one property is sufficient to disqualify it.
- Counterexamples: To prove a property is false, a single, clear counterexample is sufficient. For 's transitivity, the case with is a critical counterexample.
- Understanding the Domain: The set on which the relation is defined ( in this case) is crucial. Properties might hold on one set but not another.
Summary
We analyzed both relations and against the three conditions for an equivalence relation: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. Relation was found to be reflexive and symmetric but not transitive. Relation was found to be reflexive and transitive but not symmetric. Since neither relation satisfies all three conditions, neither is an equivalence relation.
The final answer is \boxed{D}.