Question
The number of relations on the set , containing at most 6 elements including , which are reflexive and transitive but not symmetric, is __________.
Answer: 1
Solution
Key Concepts and Formulas
- Reflexive Relation: A relation on a set is reflexive if for every element , the pair is in .
- Transitive Relation: A relation on a set is transitive if for all , whenever and , it must follow that .
- Symmetric Relation: A relation on a set is symmetric if for all , whenever , it must follow that .
- Not Symmetric Relation: A relation on a set is not symmetric if there exists at least one pair such that .
Step-by-Step Solution
Step 1: Identify the base elements required for the relation. The set is . For a relation to be reflexive, it must contain all pairs of the form for every . So, must contain . The problem also states that the relation must contain the element . Therefore, the minimal set of elements that must contain is . The number of elements in is 4.
Step 2: Analyze the constraints on the size of the relation and the "not symmetric" condition. The relation must contain at most 6 elements, so . Since already has 4 elements, we can add at most more elements to . The relation must be "not symmetric". The definition of a not symmetric relation is that there exists at least one pair such that . Since , for to be not symmetric, it is sufficient that . If , then would be symmetric with respect to the pair .
Step 3: Consider the implications of for the "not symmetric" condition. If , then the condition "not symmetric" is satisfied by the presence of and the absence of . This implies that the relation is symmetric for all other distinct pairs of elements. That is, if where and , then must also be in .
Step 4: Enumerate possible relations by adding elements to while satisfying all conditions. We start with , and . We can add 0, 1, or 2 more elements.
-
Case 1: Add 0 elements. Let .
- Reflexive: Yes, it contains .
- Contains : Yes.
- Not Symmetric: Yes, because and .
- Transitive: To check transitivity, we look for pairs and . The only non-reflexive pair is . There are no other pairs that start with . Thus, there are no implications for transitivity that require adding new elements. So, is transitive.
- Size: . Yes. This is a valid relation.
-
Case 2: Add 1 element. If we add only one element, say , then . According to Step 3, if and , then must also be in for the relation to be symmetric for pairs other than . So, adding a single non-reflexive element is not allowed under the interpretation derived in Step 3. Thus, we cannot add exactly one element.
-
Case 3: Add 2 elements. The two elements must be a symmetric pair of non-reflexive elements, as per Step 3. The possible pairs of distinct elements from are . Since is already included and must be excluded, we can only consider adding or .
-
Subcase 3a: Add . Let .
- Reflexive: Yes.
- Contains : Yes.
- Not Symmetric: Yes, and .
- Size: . Yes.
- Transitive: We check for implications. We have and . For transitivity, must be in . However, . Therefore, is not transitive. This relation is invalid.
-
Subcase 3b: Add . Let .
- Reflexive: Yes.
- Contains : Yes.
- Not Symmetric: Yes, and .
- Size: . Yes.
- Transitive: We check for implications. We have and . For transitivity, must be in . However, . Therefore, is not transitive. This relation is invalid.
-
Step 5: Conclude the number of valid relations. From the analysis in Step 4, only one relation satisfies all the given conditions: .
Common Mistakes & Tips
- Misinterpreting "Not Symmetric": The standard definition of "not symmetric" is existential. However, in questions designed to have a unique small answer, it often implies a specific asymmetry (like only one pair breaking symmetry). Always check if the problem context implies a stricter interpretation.
- Forgetting Transitivity: After ensuring reflexivity, the presence of , and the "not symmetric" condition, it's crucial to rigorously check transitivity. Transitivity can impose requirements for additional elements.
- Counting Elements: Keep track of the number of elements at each step to ensure the size constraint is met.
Summary We are looking for relations on that are reflexive, contain , are transitive, not symmetric, and have at most 6 elements. Reflexivity requires . The condition of containing means must include at least . For the relation to be "not symmetric" given , it must be that . This implies that for any other non-reflexive pair in , must also be in . Considering relations with 4, 5, or 6 elements, we find that only the relation satisfies all conditions. Adding any other elements, while maintaining the implied symmetry for pairs other than and , violates transitivity or exceeds the size limit.
The final answer is .