Question
Let S = {E 1 , E 2 , ........., E 8 } be a sample space of a random experiment such that for every n = 1, 2, ........, 8. Then the number of elements in the set is ___________.
Answer: 36
Solution
This problem involves calculating the number of subsets of a given sample space that satisfy a specific probability condition. The core idea is to translate the probability condition into a condition on the sum of indices of the elementary events, and then systematically count the subsets.
1. Key Concepts and Formulas
- Probability of an Event in a Discrete Sample Space: For an event , where is a discrete sample space, .
- Sum of Probabilities: The sum of probabilities of all elementary events in a sample space must equal 1: .
- Complement of an Event: For any event , its complement . The sum of indices of elements in and satisfies , where is the sum of indices of all elements in .
2. Step-by-Step Solution
Step 1: Verify the Validity of the Probability Distribution First, we must ensure that the given probabilities for the elementary events sum to 1. The sample space is , and for . Let's sum these probabilities: The sum of the first natural numbers is given by the formula . For , the sum is . Since the sum is 1, the given probability distribution is valid.
Step 2: Translate the Probability Condition into a Sum of Indices Condition We are looking for subsets such that . Let be the sum of the indices of the elementary events in . That is, . Using the definition of : Now, we can rewrite the given condition in terms of : To find the minimum integer value for , we multiply both sides by 36: Since is a sum of integers (the indices ), it must be an integer. Therefore, the condition implies . Our task is to find the number of subsets such that the sum of the indices of their elements is greater than or equal to 29.
Step 3: Utilize the Complement Event Strategy Directly counting subsets with a large sum of indices () can be complex. It's often easier to count the complementary event. Let be the complement of . The sum of all indices in is . For any subset , . We can rewrite the condition in terms of : So, we need to find the number of subsets such that the sum of the indices of its elements is less than or equal to 7. Each such subset uniquely corresponds to a subset that satisfies the original condition.
Step 4: Systematically Enumerate Subsets with The elements available for forming are , with indices . We list subsets based on the sum of their indices:
- Sum = 0:
- The empty set: (1 subset)
- Sum = 1:
- (1 subset)
- Sum = 2:
- (1 subset)
- Sum = 3:
- () (2 subsets)
- Sum = 4:
- () (2 subsets)
- Sum = 5:
- ()
- () (3 subsets)
- Sum = 6:
- ()
- ()
- () (4 subsets)
- Sum = 7:
- ()
- ()
- ()
- () (5 subsets)
Any subset with 4 or more elements will have a sum of indices greater than 7 (e.g., the smallest sum for 4 elements is ). Thus, we have enumerated all possible subsets with .
Step 5: Calculate the Total Count Adding up the number of subsets for each possible sum: Total number of subsets such that is: .
Each of these 19 subsets corresponds to a unique subset that satisfies the original condition . Therefore, the number of elements in the set is 19.
3. Common Mistakes & Tips
- Forgetting to verify : Always perform this check to ensure the problem is well-posed.
- Rounding errors: When converting a fractional probability condition to an integer sum condition (e.g., ), ensure correct rounding up for 'greater than or equal to' conditions.
- Incomplete enumeration: When listing subsets for a specific sum, use a systematic method (e.g., by number of elements, or by smallest index) to avoid missing combinations.
- Not using the complement: For conditions involving "large" sums/probabilities, counting the complement (which involves "small" sums/probabilities) is often much simpler and less prone to errors.
4. Summary
The problem required us to count subsets whose probability met a certain threshold. We first verified the probability distribution of the sample space. Then, we converted the probability condition into an equivalent condition on the sum of indices of the elementary events in the subset, . To simplify counting, we used the complementary event approach, which meant counting subsets with . A careful, systematic enumeration of these complementary subsets yielded 19.
The final answer is .